中国DOS联盟

Currently, the relatively rapidly developing DOS should be FREEDOS. Although its core form is quite different from that of MS-DOS, etc., most of the external commands can be ported to MSDOS, etc. The advantage of FREEDOS lies in being free and open, and basically all external commands contain source programs. And it is still continuously developing with the support of many DOS enthusiasts abroad. Should FREEDOS be focused on promoting?

Yes, we should play the role of the leader of FreeDOS in China, so that FreeDOS can be promoted and developed in China. It should be vigorously promoted.

DOS should be Free, because it has too many advantages and too many disadvantages.

However, what the result of Free will be depends on the domestic level of cognition and understanding of Free. It is not only a right but also an obligation, but most people do not realize this.

DOS commands are the most direct and also easy to edit.
We should find some DOS experts to exchange experiences.

The development trend of FreeDOS will be like that of LINUX. The government of our country has always been concerned and uneasy about Microsoft's Windows series, so it vigorously develops LINUX. An operating system like FreeDOS that is free and has open source code is believed to have a very promising development prospect. Our "China DOS Union" has a great obligation and necessity to vigorously publicize and promote it.

This is right, this is the correct path, that is, the path of "developing towards a new DOS era".

Nay!
I think Free DOS won't go far. On the contrary, I feel it will eventually be replaced by some fool - proof programs in Windows. In the future, all things will be such that no need for self - programming or something like that. It's very likely that just a light click of the mouse will be enough!
Also, I think Linux won't replace Windows. Because the former operating system is completely free, but Windows costs a lot of money and is commercial. I still think that one day the commercial one will replace the completely free one.

It won't replace, especially not in foreign countries. The fact is that they develop together.

Hehe! What the super moderator upstairs said is also very reasonable. In the near future, it is like this. Let's develop together, I admit.

Business replacing free = the poor replacing the rich's status?? Impossible... This world is simply impossible. If a certain software that was free suddenly starts charging, I think many people will immediately give up using it... and switch to using other similar software that is a bit less performant but free...

However, the so-called free software is by no means the commonly said freeware in terms of its meaning, and they have different connotations.
Free software is usually software based on the famous GNU GPL license, while freeware is another matter.

FreeDOS represents free software, which is the direction of future development, and of course it should be well promoted.

Hehe. For me, DOS is my interest. No matter what, I just like it!

Although I am not from your country, I completely agree with what moderator Wengier said. I also like DOS very much. Although its graphics are not as beautiful as Windows and its operation is not as simple as Windows, in terms of work efficiency, DOS is indeed more efficient than Windows, and it also consumes less computer resources than Windows.

The person upstairs:
I take the liberty to ask, which country are you from and why do you speak Chinese so well?