|
kirov
版主
        Pfc.YangZJ
积分 412
发帖 223
注册 2008-12-31 来自 上海杨浦
状态 离线
|
『第 46 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
其实,说实话,我也是一开始由于某些原因接触到了同济大学图书馆(9x年的事情了,那时候图书馆还没改造)的一台用于借还书的x86电脑(那时候我还小,就5岁而已啊……),被那时还不认识的CMD给吓了一跳,误打误撞把它当成了notepad- -|||
打什么进去都没用,没法子,反正图书馆里有电脑书啊~于是就一本一本,日积月累地看了……总算在第三年对CMD的一些命令有了点了解(说实话,要不是5岁-8岁看了点关于Windows和CMD的书,现在英文不知会差到什么程度了……),第四年,又由于某些原因,我再也碰不到那里的电脑了,但里面的好多书都被带了出来,不乏馆藏书……
所以说,我是一名从Windows NT 4.0 Workstation版本下的CMD下成长的DOS爱好者。如果真的要把DOS和CMD分开,还不如说让我再早出生5-6年……至少那个时候我能碰到的电脑里一定就是DOS了……
我个人的理解就是,DOS是真正的一套具有独立引导,磁盘管理,硬件应用的“独立系统”,不需存在其他的第三方。即便说有第三方存在,不如说是BIOS吧……呵呵
而CMD不过是Windows下调用的一个应用罢了。个人认为可以理解为DOS下的那个DOS Shell吧……咱们再把上面说的结构解释下,就是最底层一个BIOS,上面有个Windows(3.x,9x还要在中间加个DOS,NT 内核就直接堆在BIOS上了),上面再摞个CMD……一抽掉Windows,CMD就无法存活了。
Windows和CMD可以互相调用资源,毕竟CMD不过是基于Windows核心写出来的一个程序罢了。归根结底不过就是变着法地模仿DOS。但究其本质它不是DOS,它只是CMD!
如果说的有什么不对的,还望大伙指出!
Last edited by kirov on 2010-2-24 at 23:58 ]
Actually, to be honest, I first came into contact with an x86 computer used for borrowing and returning books in Tongji University Library for some reason (this was in the 90s, and the library hadn't been renovated yet). At that time, I was just 5 years old... I was startled by the CMD I didn't know yet and mistakenly took it for notepad - -|||
Typing anything in didn't work. Well, there were computer books in the library anyway~ So I read them one by one, accumulating knowledge over time... Finally, in the third year, I had some understanding of some CMD commands (to be honest, if I hadn't read some books about Windows and CMD from 5 to 8 years old, my English would probably be much worse...). In the fourth year, for some reason, I couldn't touch that computer anymore, but many of the books inside were brought out, including library collections...
So I am a DOS enthusiast who grew up under CMD in Windows NT 4.0 Workstation. If we really want to separate DOS and CMD, it's better to say that I was born 5-6 years earlier... At least the computers I could have touched back then must have been DOS...
My personal understanding is that DOS is a real "independent system" with independent booting, disk management, and hardware application, without the need for other third parties. Even if there are third parties, it's probably the BIOS... Hehe
And CMD is just an application called under Windows. Personally, I can understand it as the DOS Shell under DOS... Let's explain the above structure again, that is, at the bottom layer is a BIOS, above it is Windows (3.x, 9x still needs to add a DOS in the middle, and the NT kernel is directly stacked on the BIOS), and then CMD is stacked on top... Once Windows is removed, CMD can't survive.
Windows and CMD can call resources from each other, after all, CMD is just a program written based on the Windows core. In the final analysis, it's just a way to imitate DOS. But essentially it's not DOS, it's just CMD!
If there's anything wrong, I hope everyone can point it out!
Last edited by kirov on 2010-2-24 at 23:58 ]
|

以牙还牙,加倍奉还。
----BH4EAW 杨志杰
Blog:我的blog |
|
2010-2-24 23:57 |
|
|
Vista2008
版主
       
积分 707
发帖 287
注册 2010-1-13 来自 尖竹汶府
状态 离线
|
|
2010-3-21 19:14 |
|
|
linc
新手上路

积分 12
发帖 7
注册 2010-3-29
状态 离线
|
|
2010-3-30 11:15 |
|
|
woxizishen
新手上路

积分 6
发帖 7
注册 2010-2-26
状态 离线
|
『第 49 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
我的神呀
cmd裡面的命令IF FOR SET和DOS里的大同小異
太叫真了吧!
難道非要盡DOS搞這些才算對的 我漢
Oh my god
The commands IF FOR SET in cmd are similar to those in DOS
Is it too nitpicky!
Do I have to stick to DOS to do these things? Oh well
|
|
2010-4-6 18:27 |
|
|
DOSroot
管理员
         
积分 389
发帖 198
注册 2008-9-23
状态 离线
|
『第 50 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
Originally posted by woxizishen at 2010-4-6 18:27:
我的神呀
cmd裡面的命令IF FOR SET和DOS里的大同小異
太叫真了吧!
難道非要盡DOS搞這些才算對的 我漢
从表面上看确实是大同小异,而且 CMD 的功能远比 DOS 的 COMMAND 要强大,但请问用 CMD 方式编写的命令完全可以在 DOS 下运行吗?这里是 DOS 论坛,更而且这里又是 DOS 版块,自然是只讨论 DOS 问题,不考虑其它操作系统问题。
Originally posted by woxizishen at 2010-4-6 18:27:
Oh my god
The commands like IF, FOR, SET in cmd are more or less the same as those in DOS
Is that too nitpicky!
Do we really have to stick to DOS to get these right? I'm confused.
On the surface, they do seem quite similar. And the functionality of CMD is far more powerful than that of DOS's COMMAND. But the question is: Can commands written in CMD format run completely under DOS? This is a DOS forum, and specifically, it's the DOS section, so naturally, we only discuss DOS - related issues and don't consider problems from other operating systems.
|
|
2010-4-6 19:00 |
|
|
windows7
初级用户
 
积分 44
发帖 17
注册 2008-6-20
状态 离线
|
『第 51 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
我表示鸭梨很大,ID首先和DOS无关,汗~
比较好奇DOS和CMD分不清的人怎么会跑来这?
这里很专业,本该如此。支持~~~~~~~~
I'm under a lot of pressure. The ID has nothing to do with DOS first, sweat~
I'm quite curious how people who can't tell the difference between DOS and CMD would come here?
It's very professional here, and it should be like that. Support~~~~~~~~
|
|
2010-6-11 21:51 |
|
|
Edison00001
初级用户
 
积分 20
发帖 9
注册 2009-6-26
状态 离线
|
『第 52 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
CMD是WINDOWS的一个"傀儡",一个模仿DOS的傀儡
批处理则是CMD/DOS的自动化操作,也算是他们的"傀儡"......
CMD is a "puppet" of WINDOWS, a puppet imitating DOS. Batch processing is the automated operation of CMD/DOS, which can also be regarded as their "puppet"......
|
|
2010-8-2 15:34 |
|
|
mini2324
初级用户
 
积分 106
发帖 55
注册 2010-8-4
状态 离线
|
|
2010-8-25 16:14 |
|
|
glodboy
新手上路

积分 10
发帖 11
注册 2010-12-24
状态 离线
|
『第 54 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
搞了这么久,原来我一直被蒙蔽啊。。概念搞混淆了,还好看了这个,要不丢人丢到姥姥家了。。。
实在汗颜。。
After working on it for so long, it turns out I've been deceived all along. I confused the concepts. Fortunately, I read this, otherwise I would have been really embarrassed....Really feel ashamed.
|
|
2011-1-8 15:22 |
|
|
chenyucheng
初级用户
  我是新人
积分 152
发帖 70
注册 2023-7-21 来自 浙江省台州市
状态 离线
|
『第 55 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
我为什么发帖有时“你的请求来路不正确或表单验证串不符”,有时会500错误?
Why do I sometimes get "Your request source is incorrect or the form verification string does not match" when posting, and sometimes get a 500 error?
|

新手上路!
现在的我来研究研究,我小时没用过的操作系统--DOS。古老的DOS资源比较稀缺,现在新开发的DOS软件也很少,还需要大家的努力,让DOS玩出新花样. |
|
2023-8-1 11:56 |
|