|
DOSroot
管理员
         
积分 389
发帖 198
注册 2008-9-23
状态 离线
|
『第 16 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
Originally posted by wl00560 at 2009-3-8 04:00:
这儿应该允许发CMD的内容……
想要“和平演变”,这是不可能的事情,至少在我做管理员期间。
Originally posted by wl00560 at 2009-3-8 04:00:
CMD content should be allowed here...
It's impossible to want "peaceful evolution". At least during my tenure as administrator.
|
|
2009-3-11 13:11 |
|
|
HAT
版主
       
积分 9023
发帖 5017
注册 2007-5-31
状态 离线
|
『第 17 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
Originally posted by DOSroot at 2009-3-11 01:11 PM:
想要“和平演变”,这是不可能的事情,至少在我做管理员期间。
非常支持管理员的工作!
Originally posted by DOSroot at 2009-3-11 01:11 PM:
Wanting "peaceful evolution" is an impossible thing, at least during my term as administrator.
Highly support the administrator's work!
|

 |
|
2009-3-11 22:44 |
|
|
Climbing
铂金会员
       网络独行侠
积分 6962
发帖 2753
注册 2003-4-16 来自 河北保定
状态 离线
|
『第 18 楼』:
@DOSroot
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
形而上学的争论只是打口水仗,没有实际意义。我们应该用事实来说话。现在这个论坛有11个技术版块,我们不以发帖数论英雄,因为发帖包括回复帖子,而回复帖子很多都是灌水。所以我们用主题数大致可以确定一个版块的重要性和受关注程度。我大致统计了一下,主题数前三名的版块如下:
批处理室:12098
解答室:6265
启动盘室:4887
余下主题比较多的就是教学室(4174)和综合讨论区(3307),再其它的就不足为论了。了解DOS联盟论坛历史的都应该知道,批处理室是从解答室分出去的,很多批处理室的帖子都是从解答室转移过去的,它排名第一是真正的后来居上,为什么?因为与DOS相关的最热门的有前途的用途就是批处理和脚本技术,而在批处理室讨论的绝大部分批处理与脚本,基本下都属于CMD范畴,纯DOS的批处理我想现在用的人已经不太多了吧,就算使用范围很广,也只是一些低级应用,用纯DOS的批处理能够开发出一个复杂的程序的人,就我所知的也不过一个Bart而已(用于它的DOS启动盘系列,也就是modboot)。所以,实际上来说,DOS已经式微,就目前来看,主要应用于一些专用领域,而在PC上,估计大部分人用它来运行一下GHOST或者与磁盘维护有关的软件(例如分区、磁盘修复之类的)。
在我看来,一个论坛分工太细并不绝对是好事儿,我们要搞清楚设立论坛的目的。说白了,如果你只是搞软件开发和发布,根本不需要论坛,一个web页面就满足要求了。而论坛主要是用来供人们参加讨论的场所,所以一切之规则,都应该为这个大前提服务,方便人们参与讨论并进一步解决实际问题,这才是建立论坛的根本宗旨。而分类太细就是与这个基本宗旨相违背的,因为分工太细,对于新手来说可能会觉得无所适从,过于专业的分类要么导致新手乱发帖,要么导致不敢发帖,这无论对用户还是对论坛来说都不是好事儿。
一个好的论坛的讨论气氛是慢慢酝酿出来的,而不是靠细分版块及强力规则双重加压挤出来的。好的气氛需要有热心的高手慢慢引导并逐渐扩大才能慢慢搞出来。在这方面,DOS联盟做的最好的版主就是Willsort,当然,Wengier也不错。在我看来,DOS联盟最有意义的一个版块就是解答室(事实也证明了这一点),这里的讨论气氛最活跃,因为它属于论坛的综合版块(实际上教学室在功能上也算是解答室,两者分开没有意义),例如我个人基本上只泡在解答室,而且一泡多年,可以算是对解答室十分了解,为什么这里最活跃,因为这里的规则最少,而应用范围却最广,事实上,将批处理室从解答室独立出去是不太明智的,它应该作为一个子版块出现在解答室下面。而与DOS相关的讨论,最多的就是批处理(无论是DOS还是CMD吧),我之所以说CMD和DOS一脉相承,就是在批处理应用上,其本质还是命令行,从命令行来看,我实在看不出DOS和CMD有什么本质区别。
当然,DOSroot一直强调的就是抱着实用主义的态度来搞DOS是不对的,大家在他的这种论调引导下,想当然的也认为实用主义是错误的。在我看来,他的这种论调本身就是错误的。在我看来,只有实用主义才是引导这个世界进步的最基本的动力,一个不实用的东西是没有必要造出来的,这叫闭门造车。抱着你的这种理想来搞DOS的人,搞出来的DOS肯定也是没有用处的。举个实例,我当初之所以来DOS联盟论坛,并不是为了学习DOS本身才来的,我当时是为了解决工作中的实际问题(使用CMD编写批处理)才来到这里并一直留在了这里。在我的实用主义看来,无论是DOS和CMD,都不过是方便工作的工具而已,我所做的一切最终都是为了我的工作(不能完全是兴趣),当然,我们要学好DOS,肯定要搞清楚DOS和CMD的区别和联系,认清两者各自的优点和缺点,而在解决具体问题上,就是取长补短,该用DOS的时候用DOS,该用CMD的时候就用CMD(实际上,该用Unix Shell的时候就要用Unix Shell,推而广之,该用什么就用什么),一切都视乎你的具体应用情况。分不清DOS和CMD是不对的,这说明你缺乏基础知识,但非要把DOS和CMD强行区分开来更不对,说明你的人生观有问题(机械和教条,这恐怕都不是褒义词)。虽然大丈夫有所不为,有所必为,那是做人的原则问题,在技术上搞这一套很显然就只能说明你逻辑简单了。
Metaphysical arguments are just water-splashing fights with no practical significance. We should speak with facts. Currently, this forum has 11 technical sections. We don't judge heroes by the number of posts because posts include replying to threads, and many replies are just filling. So we can roughly determine the importance and attention degree of a section by the number of topics. I roughly counted the top three sections in terms of the number of topics as follows:
Batch Processing Room: 12098
Answer Room: 6265
Boot Disk Room: 4887
The remaining sections with relatively more topics are the Teaching Room (4174) and the Comprehensive Discussion Area (3307), and the others are negligible. Those who know the history of the DOS Union forum should all know that the Batch Processing Room was split off from the Answer Room. Many posts in the Batch Processing Room were transferred from the Answer Room. Its first place is truly coming from behind. Why? Because the most popular and promising use related to DOS is batch processing and scripting technologies. And most of the batch processing and scripts discussed in the Batch Processing Room basically belong to the CMD category. I think there are not too many people using pure DOS batch processing now. Even if it has a wide range of uses, it's just some low-level applications. The only person I know who can develop a complex program with pure DOS batch processing is Bart (for his DOS boot disk series, that is, modboot). So, actually, DOS is on the decline. At present, it is mainly applied in some specialized fields. And on PCs, I guess most people use it to run GHOST or disk maintenance-related software (such as partitioning, disk repair, etc.).
In my opinion, having too detailed a division in a forum is not absolutely a good thing. We need to figure out the purpose of setting up the forum. To put it simply, if you just do software development and release, you don't need a forum; a web page is enough. The forum is mainly a place for people to participate in discussions. So all rules should serve this main premise, facilitating people to participate in discussions and further solve practical problems. This is the fundamental purpose of setting up the forum. And too detailed classification goes against this basic purpose because too detailed a division may make novices feel at a loss. Overly professional classifications may either lead novices to post randomly or make them不敢 post. This is not good for both users and the forum.
A good discussion atmosphere in a forum is gradually nurtured, not squeezed out by both detailed section division and strong rules. A good atmosphere needs to be gradually cultivated by enthusiastic experts guiding and expanding it. In this regard, the best moderator of the DOS Union is Willsort. Of course, Wengier is also good. In my opinion, the most meaningful section of the DOS Union is the Answer Room (and this has been proven by facts). The discussion atmosphere here is the most active because it belongs to the comprehensive section of the forum (actually, the Teaching Room is also a comprehensive section in terms of function, and there is no point in separating them). For example, I basically only hang out in the Answer Room and have been doing so for many years, so I can be said to be very familiar with the Answer Room. Why is it the most active? Because it has the fewest rules and the widest range of applications. In fact, it was not wise to split the Batch Processing Room from the Answer Room; it should be a sub-section under the Answer Room. And the most discussions related to DOS are about batch processing (whether DOS or CMD). The reason I say CMD and DOS are in the same line is that in terms of batch processing application, essentially it's still command line. From the perspective of command line, I really can't see the essential difference between DOS and CMD.
Of course, DOSroot has been emphasizing that it's wrong to take a utilitarian attitude towards DOS. Under his guidance, everyone also thinks utilitarianism is wrong. In my opinion, his argument itself is wrong. In my opinion, only utilitarianism is the most basic driving force for the progress of the world. A thing that is not practical has no need to be created. This is called闭门造车. Those who engage in DOS with your ideal will definitely create useless DOS. For example, the reason I came to the DOS Union forum was not to learn DOS itself. I came here to solve practical problems at work (writing batch processing with CMD) and have stayed here ever since. In my utilitarian view, both DOS and CMD are just tools to facilitate work. Everything I do is ultimately for my work (not entirely out of interest). Of course, to learn DOS well, we must figure out the differences and connections between DOS and CMD, recognize their respective advantages and disadvantages, and in solving specific problems, we should make up for each other's deficiencies. Use DOS when it's appropriate, use CMD when it's appropriate (actually, use Unix Shell when it's appropriate, and by extension, use whatever is appropriate). Everything depends on your specific application. It's wrong not to distinguish between DOS and CMD, which shows a lack of basic knowledge. But it's even more wrong to forcibly distinguish between DOS and CMD, which shows a problem with your world view (mechanical and dogmatic, which are probably not compliments). Although a man should have what he won't do and what he must do, that's a matter of principles in life. Doing this in technology obviously just shows simple logic.
|

偶只喜欢回答那些标题和描述都很清晰的帖子!
如想解决问题,请认真学习“这个帖子”和“这个帖子”并努力遵守,如果可能,请告诉更多的人!
|
|
2009-3-12 02:20 |
|
|
Climbing
铂金会员
       网络独行侠
积分 6962
发帖 2753
注册 2003-4-16 来自 河北保定
状态 离线
|
『第 19 楼』:
版主的作用对论坛的正常运行来说是很重要的
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
一个好的论坛,首先,要有一个好的讨论话题(这叫实用主义),对于DOS联盟来说,这个话题就是批处理(或者说是与DOS和CMD有关的命令行)。第二位的问题就是找一个好的版主来主持论坛,现在批处理室之所以那么兴旺,这与前任的Willsort和现任的几位版主的技术水平与热心程度是分不开的。
而解答室之所以象现在这么冷清,并不是因为解答室的话题不好(实际上,我认为,凡是有关DOS、CMD和命令行的东西都可以在这里讨论),主要责任就在于版主在其位不谋其政,我已经很久没有看到现任的两位版主来这里主持论坛了,尤其是那个gmy,名声与来头儿都不小(或者水平也很高,但谁知道呢?),我就很少见他来这里发个帖子,更不用说什么解答别人的问题或者主持论坛了,他现在基本上也就算是一个商人,不能算是一个搞技术的。说白了,有版主就等于没有版主,我的意见是,宁可空着也别让尸位素餐的人占着位置。我说这话,并不是因为自己想当版主,我没有资格、时间和精力当版主,我只是因为经常在解答室泡着对它比较有感情,现在这么冷清让我不爽而已。十分怀念WillSort在的日子!
A good forum, first of all, should have a good discussion topic (this is called pragmatism). For the China DOS Union, this topic is batch processing (or command lines related to DOS and CMD). The second issue is to find a good forum moderator to host the forum. The reason why the Batch Processing Room is so prosperous now is inseparable from the technical level and enthusiasm of the previous Willsort and the current several moderators.
However, the Reasoning Room is so deserted now, not because the topic of the Reasoning Room is not good (in fact, I think everything related to DOS, CMD and command lines can be discussed here). The main responsibility lies in the fact that the moderator is not doing his job in his position. I haven't seen the current two moderators come here to host the forum for a long time. Especially that gmy, who has a big reputation and background (or may be very skilled, but who knows?), I rarely see him post here, let alone answer others' questions or host the forum. He is basically just a businessman now, not a technical person. To put it bluntly, having a moderator is equivalent to having no moderator. My opinion is that it is better to leave it empty than to let someone who holds the position but does nothing occupy it. I say this not because I want to be a moderator. I don't have the qualifications, time and energy to be a moderator. I just have a deep affection for the Reasoning Room because I often hang out there. It makes me unhappy that it is so deserted now. I really miss the days when Willsort was here!
此帖被 +10 点积分 点击查看详情 评分人:【 HAT 】 | 分数: +8 | 时间:2009-3-12 11:18 | 评分人:【 stance 】 | 分数: +2 | 时间:2009-4-26 09:20 |
|
|

偶只喜欢回答那些标题和描述都很清晰的帖子!
如想解决问题,请认真学习“这个帖子”和“这个帖子”并努力遵守,如果可能,请告诉更多的人!
|
|
2009-3-12 02:32 |
|
|
kyqm
初级用户
 
积分 152
发帖 42
注册 2004-3-10
状态 离线
|
『第 20 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
有用的就有生命力;被广泛关注、接受的有更强的生命力
技术应该为实际需要服务,不要为搞技术而搞技术
What is useful has vitality; what is widely concerned and accepted has stronger vitality. Technology should serve practical needs, not be done for the sake of technology itself.
|
|
2009-3-12 07:40 |
|
|
HAT
版主
       
积分 9023
发帖 5017
注册 2007-5-31
状态 离线
|
『第 21 楼』:
Re 19楼
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
批处理室相比以前,感觉也冷清了不少。大批技术水平非常不错的朋友相继离开或淡出,有的自己办批处理论坛,有的到别的批处理论坛去发展。究竟是什么原因,我也搞不清楚(有时我也会妄自猜测一下,其中有些人可能是因为对批处理的发展目标跟管理员的想法不一致甚至是大相径庭吧)。我也只是07年刚刚接触批处理,没能赶上当初的浓厚技术讨论氛围,实在是遗憾。
管理员想大力发展DOS,这没错,而且相当好。毕竟这里是DOS联盟,而不是批处理联盟。但我觉得不应通过限制批处理室等版块的发展来实现这个目标。我的想法很简单,如果每天有1000个人来访问批处理室,这些人中总有一部分会喜欢上DOS的,就像俺们的河北老乡Climbing兄那样;如果关闭批处理室,CN-DOS的访问量必将收到影响,这对发展DOS有什么好处呢?
也许是我的思维方式太简单,无法像管理员那样高瞻远瞩。一家之言,贻笑大方了。
The Batch Processing Room seems much quieter than before. A large number of friends with very good technical levels have successively left or faded out. Some have their own batch processing forums, and some have developed in other batch processing forums. I really don't know the exact reason (sometimes I also make some groundless guesses. Among them, some people may be because their development goals for batch processing are inconsistent with or even vastly different from those of the administrators). I just started to get in touch with batch processing in 2007 and didn't catch up with the strong technical discussion atmosphere at the beginning. It's really a pity.
The administrator wants to vigorously develop DOS, which is correct and quite good. After all, this is the China DOS Union, not the Batch Processing Union. But I think this goal should not be achieved by restricting the development of sections like the Batch Processing Room. My idea is very simple. If 1000 people visit the Batch Processing Room every day, some of these people will always like DOS, just like our Hebei fellow countryman Brother Climbing; if the Batch Processing Room is closed, the page view of CN-DOS will definitely be affected. What good is this for the development of DOS?
Maybe my way of thinking is too simple to be as far-sighted as the administrator. It's just my personal opinion, which may be laughed at by the experts.
|

 |
|
2009-3-12 11:41 |
|
|
pyjhhh
初级用户
 
积分 54
发帖 26
注册 2007-2-10
状态 离线
|
『第 22 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
Originally posted by Climbing at 2009-3-3 02:16 AM:
Windows NT确实不是DOS,但它的CMD窗口确实与DOS一脉相承。
正如这个论坛叫DOS联盟论坛,但还是开了很多与DOS无关的版块,知识是成体系有条理的,不 ...
支持 用dos 批处理解决问题的帖子也删除么?
没道理...
那天我还以为是怎么了呢
哎 现在明白了....
有容乃大....
有容乃大....
Originally posted by Climbing at 2009-3-3 02:16 AM:
Windows NT is indeed not DOS, but its CMD window is indeed an extension of DOS.
Just as this forum is called the DOS Union Forum, but there are still many sections unrelated to DOS. Knowledge is systematic and organized, not...
Supporting posts that use DOS batch processing to solve problems are also deleted?
That's unreasonable...
I thought something was wrong that day
Hey, now I understand....
Greatness comes from tolerance....
有容乃大....
|
|
2009-3-12 12:20 |
|
|
wxcute
中级用户
  
积分 458
发帖 211
注册 2006-7-26
状态 离线
|
『第 23 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
有些事情可能多沟通一下比较好。如论坛管理员约束其他管理人员,管理人员约束普通会员。
管理员不必事必躬亲,什么小事都过问,应该放给版主等管理人员处理。
Some things may be better to communicate more. For example, forum administrators restrain other management personnel, and management personnel restrain ordinary members.
Administrators do not need to do everything by themselves, and do not need to inquire about every trivial matter. They should leave it to forum moderators and other management personnel to handle.
|

┌───────┐
├→学习→实践→┤
└───────┘ |
|
2009-3-16 02:09 |
|
|
cmleo
初级用户
 
积分 23
发帖 12
注册 2009-2-5
状态 离线
|
『第 24 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
Originally posted by Climbing at 2009-3-12 02:20:
当然,DOSroot一直强调的就是抱着实用主义的态度来搞DOS是不对的,大家在他的这种论调引导下,想当然的也认为实用主义是错误的。在我看来,他的这种论调本身就是错误的。在我看来,只有实用主义才是引导这个世界进步的最基本的动力,一个不实用的东西是没有必要造出来的,这叫闭门造车。抱着你的这种理想来搞DOS的人,搞出来的DOS肯定也是没有用处的。举个实例,我当初之所以来DOS联盟论坛,并不是为了学习DOS本身才来的,我当时是为了解决工作中的实际问题(使用CMD编写批处理)才来到这里并一直留在了这里。在我的实用主义看来,无论是DOS和CMD,都不过是方便工作的工具而已,我所做的一切最终都是为了我的工作(不能完全是兴趣),当然,我们要学好DOS,肯定要搞清楚DOS和CMD的区别和联系,认清两者各自的优点和缺点,而在解决具体问题上,就是取长补短,该用DOS的时候用DOS,该用CMD的时候就用CMD(实际上,该用Unix Shell的时候就要用Unix Shell,推而广之,该用什么就用什么),一切都视乎你的具体应用情况。分不清DOS和CMD是不对的,这说明你缺乏基础知识,但非要把DOS和CMD强行区分开来更不对,说明你的人生观有问题(机械和教条,这恐怕都不是褒义词)。虽然大丈夫有所不为,有所必为,那是做人的原则问题,在技术上搞这一套很显然就只能说明你逻辑简单了。
有同感,本人也是由于工作原因来到本论坛。通过解决实际问题而提高自己。
Originally posted by Climbing at 2009-3-12 02:20:
Of course, DOSroot has always emphasized that having a utilitarian attitude towards DOS is wrong. Under the guidance of his argument, everyone also mistakenly thinks that utilitarianism is wrong. In my opinion, his argument itself is wrong. In my view, only utilitarianism is the most basic driving force for the progress of the world. A thing that is not practical has no need to be created; this is called闭门造车 (building a cart behind closed doors). People who engage in DOS with your kind of idealism will definitely create a useless DOS. For example, the reason I came to the DOS Union forum in the first place was not to learn DOS itself, but to solve practical problems at work (using CMD to write batch scripts) that brought me here and kept me here. From my utilitarian perspective, both DOS and CMD are just tools to facilitate work. Everything I do is ultimately for my work (not purely out of interest). Of course, to learn DOS well, we must understand the differences and connections between DOS and CMD, recognize their respective advantages and disadvantages, and in solving specific problems, we should make up for what is lacking and use what is appropriate. Use DOS when you should, use CMD when you should (actually, use Unix Shell when you should, and by extension, use whatever you should), all depending on your specific application. It's wrong to not distinguish between DOS and CMD, which shows a lack of basic knowledge, but it's even more wrong to forcefully distinguish between DOS and CMD, which shows a problem with your world view (mechanical and dogmatic, which are probably not compliments). Although a man should do what he should and not do what he shouldn't, that's a matter of principles in life. Doing this in technology obviously just shows that your logic is simple.
I have the same feeling. I also came to this forum due to work reasons. I improve myself by solving practical problems.
|
|
2009-3-18 11:54 |
|
|
creda
新手上路

积分 12
发帖 10
注册 2008-12-30
状态 离线
|
『第 25 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
我觉得很奇怪。楼主,在我看来CMD就是简化了的原DOS系统,无非都是工具嘛,楼上的我很同意,在这里都不能问一下CMD的问题了?
Last edited by creda on 2009-4-14 at 23:30 ]
I feel very strange. LZ, in my opinion, CMD is a simplified version of the original DOS system, nothing more than tools. I very much agree with the person above. Can't we ask questions about CMD here?
Last edited by creda on 2009-4-14 at 23:30 ]
|
|
2009-4-14 23:27 |
|
|
jj65535
新手上路

积分 19
发帖 15
注册 2009-4-5
状态 离线
|
『第 26 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
其实最大的区别就是DOS是一个独立的操作系统!
CMD不能脱离它自己操作平台!不能单独使用!(可能是我没找到方法)
区分也好!很多CMD能用命令和变量在DOS中不能用!DOS环境法的问题都跑到CMD去概念上去回答!浪费了高手们的时间!
In fact, the biggest difference is that DOS is an independent operating system! CMD cannot operate independently without its own operating platform! It cannot be used alone! (Maybe I haven't found the method.)
Distinguishing is also fine! There are many commands and variables that CMD can use but cannot be used in DOS! The issues of the DOS environment method are all answered in the concept of CMD, which wastes the time of experts!
|
|
2009-4-17 21:42 |
|
|
qzwqzw
银牌会员
     天的白色影子
积分 2343
发帖 636
注册 2004-3-6
状态 离线
|
『第 27 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
Climbing的言论把问题引向了另一个方向,那就是实用主义和理想主义的争锋。
据我所知,这个论坛包括它的母体CN-DOS联盟以及早期的一些加盟主站(新DOS时代,起步DOS等)都是由一些理想主义者创建并管理的,只是经过长期的发展和演变,一些半途闯入的实用主义者和一些由理想主义者蜕变出的实用主义者,将论坛原有的气氛稀释并发展成现在的模样。因此在此时此地,讨论谁对谁错不具有太多的意义,因此而指摘对方的人生观则确实有些过火了。
至于论坛的管理方式,我的建议是引入相对的封闭机制,比如独立出一个版块,只允许获取一定资质的会员(比如元老会员或者管理者发出邀请的会员)进行讨论(可以不限制阅读),这样物以类聚,人以群分,更便于管理。
至于DOS与CMD,CLI与GUI的辩驳我不参与,我的想法是学习周总理的外交策略,求同存异,坚持几项基本原则不动摇。
当然最后的决定还是要论坛的实际维护者来决定的,就如同DOSroot所说,只要他还是管理者,论坛的管理意志就是以他为主的。心悦诚服的可以云集影从,格格不入的可以转移阵地,犹豫不决的可以据理力争。我作为旁观者,只是希望事态能向我所希望的方向变化。
Climbing's remarks led the issue in another direction, which is the conflict between pragmatism and idealism.
As far as I know, this forum, including its parent CN-DOS Union and some early affiliated main stations (New DOS Era, Starting DOS, etc.), was founded and managed by some idealists. However, after long-term development and evolution, some pragmatists who intruded halfway and some pragmatists who transformed from idealists diluted the original atmosphere of the forum and developed it into what it is now. Therefore, at this time and place, discussing who is right or wrong is not of much significance, and criticizing the other party's outlook on life is indeed going too far.
As for the management method of the forum, my suggestion is to introduce a relatively closed mechanism. For example, separate a section where only members with certain qualifications (such as veteran members or members invited by managers) are allowed to discuss (reading can not be restricted). In this way, like attracts like and people get together with their own kind, which is more convenient for management.
As for the debate between DOS and CMD, CLI and GUI, I will not participate. My idea is to learn Premier Zhou's diplomatic strategy, seek common ground while reserving differences, and adhere to several basic principles without wavering.
Of course, the final decision is still up to the actual maintainers of the forum. Just as DOSroot said, as long as he is still the manager, the management will of the forum is dominated by him. Those who are sincerely convinced can gather around, those who are not in harmony can move to other places, and those who are hesitant can argue their points. As an onlooker, I just hope that the situation will change in the direction I hope.
|
|
2009-4-19 13:30 |
|
|
stance
初级用户
 
积分 64
发帖 46
注册 2008-4-21
状态 离线
|
『第 28 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
太武断了吧!
好久没来,真没看置顶的帖子,一下就被删除了。
懊恼!
That's too hasty!
Haven't been here for a long time, really didn't read the sticky post, and was deleted immediately.
Annoyed!
|
|
2009-4-26 09:18 |
|
|
stance
初级用户
 
积分 64
发帖 46
注册 2008-4-21
状态 离线
|
『第 29 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
Originally posted by Climbing at 2009-3-12 02:32 AM:
一个好的论坛,首先,要有一个好的讨论话题(这叫实用主义),对于DOS联盟来说,这个话题就是批处理(或者说是与DOS和CMD有关的命令行)。第二位 ...
说出了我的心里话!
版主没有服务意识,倒像是个提刀等着宰人的刽子手。
这不是往外轰人吗?
Originally posted by Climbing at 2009-3-12 02:32 AM:
A good forum, first of all, should have a good discussion topic (this is called pragmatism). For the China DOS Union, this topic is batch processing (or command lines related to DOS and CMD). The second ...
Speaks my mind!
The moderator has no service consciousness, but rather seems like an executioner waiting with a knife to kill people.
Isn't this driving people away?
|
|
2009-4-26 09:23 |
|
|
stance
初级用户
 
积分 64
发帖 46
注册 2008-4-21
状态 离线
|
『第 30 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
Originally posted by DOSroot at 2009-3-1 12:54 AM:
从今天起,所有在 DOS 版块发表非 DOS 问题的主题和回帖将被直接删除,不再转移和提示,而且是扣分后删除!
这算什么规定?!
你版块这么冷清,如果你认为发错地方了可以转帖,这本来是论坛管理员的职责。你闲着没事干,还不干活儿,只管删帖、扣分,你算干什么的呢?
Originally posted by DOSroot at 2009-3-1 12:54 AM:
Starting today, all topics and replies in the DOS section that are not related to DOS issues will be directly deleted without being transferred or prompted, and they will be deleted after deduction of points!
What kind of regulation is this?!
Your section is so deserted. If you think it's in the wrong place, you can transfer the post. This is originally the responsibility of the forum administrator. You have nothing to do, but just delete posts and deduct points. What are you doing?
此帖被 -32 点积分 点击查看详情 评分人:【 雨露 】 | 分数: -42 | 时间:2010-2-19 13:34 | 评分人:【 kirov 】 | 分数: -40 | 时间:2010-2-24 23:37 | 评分人:【 DOSroot 】 | 分数: +54 | 时间:2010-2-25 18:50 | 评分人:【 Aadmin 】 | 分数: -4 | 时间:2019-3-16 10:24 |
|
|
|
2009-4-26 09:28 |
|
|