China DOS Union

-- Unite DOS · Advance DOS · Grow DOS --

Union site: www.cn-dos.net Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum
DOS stands for freedom, openness and progress. Let us work hard, learn from the openness and GNU spirit of FreeDOS and Linux, and together build and grow a free GNU GPL world!

中国DOS联盟论坛
The time now is 2026-08-13 06:45
中国DOS联盟论坛 » DOS学习入门 & 精彩文章 (教学室) » A newbie question View 1,953 Replies 4
Original Poster Posted 2004-01-20 00:00 ·  中国 河北 保定 联通
初级用户
Credits 216
Posts 27
Joined 2004-01-05 00:00
22-year member
UID 14981
Gender Male
Status Offline
I saw a sentence while studying the DOS command FORMAT on a consulting webpage: “If after formatting the total space and available space are equally large, it means the disk is normal; if the available space is smaller than the total space, it means the disk is damaged.”
My hard drive is 60G, and after formatting the available space is only a little over 55G. Could it be that my hard drive is damaged?
Floor 2 Posted 2004-01-21 00:00 ·  中国 湖北 武汉 联通
银牌会员
★★★
Credits 1,681
Posts 512
Joined 2003-08-02 00:00
23-year member
UID 7953
Gender Male
Status Offline
Total space refers to the total space shown for the hard drive.
The sentence “If after formatting the total space and available space are equally large, it means the disk is normal; if the available space is smaller than the total space, it means the disk is damaged” is a bit wrong. If you formatted with the /u parameter, then...
Somehow somewhere I've got to choose.
No matter if it is win or lose.
Floor 3 Posted 2004-01-21 00:00 ·  中国 江西 吉安 电信
版主
★★★★
Credits 7,296
Posts 1,628
Joined 2002-10-16 12:00
23-year member
UID 10
Gender Male
Status Offline
The following is quoted from honglang's post at 2004-1-20 23:20:28:
My hard drive is 60G, and after formatting the available space is only a little over 55G. Could it be that my hard drive is damaged?

Generally, if there is some difference but not much, it is caused by different calculation methods. My IBM 60G hard drive is nominally 61.4GB, and in reality it should be about 58.55G. If yours is nominally 60G, then it should be about 57.22G or so, because of the factor 1000000/(1024×1024).
But if yours adds up to only a little over 55G, that may be because of partitioning, because partitioning will cause some waste. It does not mean the hard drive is damaged.
ko20010214
=================================
大功告成,打个Kiss!
ko20010214@MSN.com
神州优雅Q300C
Intel CeleronM 370处理器 | 256MbDDR内存
40G硬盘 | USB2.0 | IEEE 1394
13.3 ' WXGA 宽屏(16:10) | COMBO光驱
10/100M网卡 | 四合一读卡器
Floor 4 Posted 2004-01-22 00:00 ·  中国 辽宁 大连 联通
初级用户
★★
幸运
Credits 313
Posts 51
Joined 2004-01-22 00:00
22-year member
UID 15918
Gender Male
From 辽宁省
Status Offline
Everyone, please listen to my analysis: first, the hard drive units are different. The reason is that we all know 1024MB=1GB. But the units used by hard drive manufacturers are instead 1000MB=1GB~ I think this problem is easy to solve~ the hard drive recognized by the computer uses 1024, while the manufacturers use it like this~
Floor 5 Posted 2004-01-30 00:00 ·  中国 广东 清远 电信
初级用户
chxhi
Credits 163
Posts 25
Joined 2004-01-29 00:00
22-year member
UID 16254
Gender Female
Status Offline
So that's how it is
Forum Jump: