China DOS Union

-- Unite DOS · Advance DOS · Grow DOS --

Union site: www.cn-dos.net Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum
DOS stands for freedom, openness and progress. Let us work hard, learn from the openness and GNU spirit of FreeDOS and Linux, and together build and grow a free GNU GPL world!

中国DOS联盟论坛
The time now is 2026-08-12 23:23
中国DOS联盟论坛 » DOS学习入门 & 精彩文章 (教学室) » Question for wengier about the SYSTEM and dblbuff loaded in memory: View 720 Replies 4
Original Poster Posted 2003-09-17 00:00 ·  中国 重庆 电信
银牌会员
★★★
Credits 2,202
Posts 499
Joined 2003-06-12 00:00
23-year member
UID 4876
Gender Male
Status Offline
This is the moderator's mem info. Why does my SYSTEM always take up 2-3K more ;( I'm just short of these 2,3K to reach 630K conventional memory, it's become an obsession ^-^) ; What determines it? And there's also a " dblbuff ". It's not in your mem; it's not in my config.sys either; why does it always get loaded? Is it because my config has a choice to boot Win98 and DOS, so it gets loaded? Can any expert explain it? Thanks!


Modules using memory below 1 MB:

Name Total Conventional Upper Memory
-------- ---------------- ---------------- ----------------
SYSTEM 32,736 (32K) 9,664 (9K) 23,072 (23K)
HIMEM 1,168 (1K) 0 (0K) 1,168 (1K)
SETVER 864 (1K) 0 (0K) 864 (1K)
VIDE-CDD 5,024 (5K) 0 (0K) 5,024 (5K)
CLOAKING 1,168 (1K) 0 (0K) 1,168 (1K)
IFSHLP 2,864 (3K) 0 (0K) 2,864 (3K)
COMMAND 7,424 (7K) 0 (0K) 7,424 (7K)
KILLER 400 (0K) 0 (0K) 400 (0K)
WATCH 3,392 (3K) 0 (0K) 3,392 (3K)
MSCDEX 2,816 (3K) 0 (0K) 2,816 (3K)
DOSKEY 5,744 (6K) 0 (0K) 5,744 (6K)
CTMOUSE 3,344 (3K) 0 (0K) 3,344 (3K)
ZENO 1,376 (1K) 0 (0K) 1,376 (1K)
ESCAPE 496 (0K) 0 (0K) 496 (0K)
Free 750,080 (732K) 645,328 (630K) 104,752 (102K)






一年四季,枫叶红了又红;人生四季,失去的,还能再来吗?—— !
Floor 2 Posted 2003-09-18 00:00 ·  美国
系统支持
★★★★★★
“新DOS时代”站长
Credits 27,736
Posts 10,521
Joined 2002-10-09 12:00
23-year member
UID 9
Status Offline
Add a line in MSDOS.SYS:
DoubleBuffer=0

There must not be a DOS=NOAUTO line in CONFIG.SYS, otherwise SYSTEM (that is, IO.SYS) will take up 1-2KB more memory.
Wengier - 新DOS时代

欢迎大家来到我的“新DOS时代”网站,里面有各类DOS软件和资料,地址:
http://wendos.mycool.net/

E-Mail & MSN: wengierwu AT hotmail.com (最近比较忙,有事请联系DOSroot和雨露,谢谢!)

Floor 3 Posted 2003-09-20 00:00 ·  中国 重庆 电信
银牌会员
★★★
Credits 2,202
Posts 499
Joined 2003-06-12 00:00
23-year member
UID 4876
Gender Male
Status Offline
Mine isn't equal to 0, hehe, mine is DOS=HIGH,UMB ,AUTO ; it's because my DoubleBuffer in msdos . SYS is set to 1. No wonder it always takes 3K from me. But if DOS decides whether to use buffering or not, and if it does use it, then when I run some programs, like compressing or extracting, wouldn't it speed up processing?
一年四季,枫叶红了又红;人生四季,失去的,还能再来吗?—— !
Floor 4 Posted 2003-09-20 00:00 ·  美国
系统支持
★★★★★★
“新DOS时代”站长
Credits 27,736
Posts 10,521
Joined 2002-10-09 12:00
23-year member
UID 9
Status Offline
That's not ordinary buffering, but double buffering. It won't necessarily speed things up like SMARTDRV does; it depends on the actual situation.
Wengier - 新DOS时代

欢迎大家来到我的“新DOS时代”网站,里面有各类DOS软件和资料,地址:
http://wendos.mycool.net/

E-Mail & MSN: wengierwu AT hotmail.com (最近比较忙,有事请联系DOSroot和雨露,谢谢!)

Floor 5 Posted 2003-09-20 00:00 ·  中国 重庆 电信
银牌会员
★★★
Credits 2,202
Posts 499
Joined 2003-06-12 00:00
23-year member
UID 4876
Gender Male
Status Offline
Oh, so this double buffering is rather special, right? ; oh dear, this, this, this "actual situation" means... I can't tell what kind of programs need double buffering to speed up running. Could the moderator give a tiny little example? Like........thanks
My dos in config isn't equal to 0, so why does SYSTEM always take 11K from me instead of getting down to your 9K? What other factors determine it?






一年四季,枫叶红了又红;人生四季,失去的,还能再来吗?—— !
Forum Jump: