China DOS Union

-- Unite DOS · Advance DOS · Grow DOS --

Union site: www.cn-dos.net Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum
DOS stands for freedom, openness and progress. Let us work hard, learn from the openness and GNU spirit of FreeDOS and Linux, and together build and grow a free GNU GPL world!

中国DOS联盟论坛
The time now is 2026-06-28 08:54
中国DOS联盟论坛 » 意见反馈 & 网友交流 » A Suggestion for the China DOS Union Forum View 2,080 Replies 4
Original Poster Posted 2010-08-14 08:58 ·  中国 浙江 嘉兴 电信
初级用户
Credits 28
Posts 25
Joined 2010-08-03 17:09
15-year member
UID 171685
Gender Male
Status Offline
I’m a newly registered newcomer. China DOS Union really is quite good; it’s full of experts, as numerous as hairs on an ox.
And precisely because there are so many experts, everyone wants to say something. So there are lots and lots of posts, and lots and lots of replies too, and that makes it hard for people to keep up. Far too hard to keep up with! Casually search for any question, and the result is hundreds or thousands of hits, and some posts have no value at all, while the replies are even more full of empty grand talk and stock phrases. So China DOS Union has become bloated, and it’s too inconvenient.
So my personal suggestions are:
1. Optimize resources, consolidate older posts, and clean out some junk.
2. Have experts give in-depth answers to some questions, and merge similar ones.
Finally, I wish this evergreen tree, China DOS Union, eternal prosperity.

[ Last edited by xqx on 2010-8-14 at 08:59 ]
Floor 2 Posted 2010-08-14 09:37 ·  中国 浙江 台州 玉环市 电信
管理员
★★★★
DOS非常爱好者
Credits 6,215
Posts 2,601
Joined 2006-01-20 13:00
20-year member
UID 49256
Status Offline
Thank you for your suggestion; we will consider it carefully.
1. Optimize resources, consolidate older posts, and clean out some junk.
Some posts really do have replies with no value. Someone brought up cleaning them out a long time ago, but after cleaning them out, part of the repliers’ credits would be deducted, which would hurt some people’s enthusiasm. Besides, what counts as “empty grand talk,” “stock phrases,” or “valuable” is very hard to judge. And the workload would also be too great. At present, some enthusiastic people have already done some consolidation of “valuable posts and replies.”
2. Have experts give in-depth answers to some questions, and merge similar ones.
This is a forum that values freedom. Experts or ordinary members can choose to answer or choose not to answer; they are free, and have no obligation to answer. Everyone has their own specialty, everyone has the freedom to speak, and everyone may be an “expert” in some area! If you are interested, you can also consolidate the wonderful replies and make a separate summary post.
Floor 3 Posted 2010-08-15 00:04 ·  中国 浙江 嘉兴 电信
初级用户
Credits 28
Posts 25
Joined 2010-08-03 17:09
15-year member
UID 171685
Gender Male
Status Offline
Not bad! Not bad!
Not seeking to be the biggest, only to be the best.
If I can live to be a hundred, I’ll definitely put together a summary post.
Floor 4 Posted 2010-08-15 00:43 ·  中国 重庆 电信
版主
★★★★★
Credits 9,023
Posts 5,017
Joined 2007-05-31 19:39
19-year member
UID 89899
Gender Male
Status Offline
China DOS Union Batch Room Classic Post Collection (2007-A)
http://www.cn-dos.net/forum/viewthread.php?tid=31551

China DOS Union Batch Room Classic Post Collection (2008-A)
http://www.cn-dos.net/forum/viewthread.php?tid=44836
Floor 5 Posted 2010-08-15 03:52 ·  中国 浙江 嘉兴 电信
初级用户
Credits 28
Posts 25
Joined 2010-08-03 17:09
15-year member
UID 171685
Gender Male
Status Offline
Thanks!
Mr. Main Board.

The content of the book is very much digest material, it’s just been messed around with by people.
Let me offer eight words: “Only seek the most, not the best”


Don’t let there be a suggestion and then it’s just: then you do it!
But if it really has to be “then you do it,” then “newbie on the road”

[ Last edited by xqx on 2010-8-17 at 08:03 ]
Forum Jump: