China DOS Union

-- Unite DOS · Advance DOS · Grow DOS --

Union site: www.cn-dos.net Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum
DOS stands for freedom, openness and progress. Let us work hard, learn from the openness and GNU spirit of FreeDOS and Linux, and together build and grow a free GNU GPL world!

中国DOS联盟论坛
The time now is 2026-08-13 13:54
中国DOS联盟论坛 » DOS学习入门 & 精彩文章 (教学室) » A Small Question View 2,352 Replies 17
Original Poster Posted 2004-03-28 00:00 ·  中国 重庆 长寿区 电信
中级用户
Credits 262
Posts 32
Joined 2004-03-24 00:00
22-year member
UID 20967
Gender Male
Status Offline
Can't the built-in MS-DOS on the computer be used?
Floor 2 Posted 2004-03-28 00:00 ·  中国 安徽 淮南 电信
银牌会员
★★★
爱DOS但不迷DOS
Credits 1,708
Posts 509
Joined 2004-02-25 00:00
22-year member
UID 18460
Gender Male
From 安徽淮南
Status Offline
Anything below 98 is pure DOS, while WinME, 2000, XP and above are all virtual.
°·.∴▍★∴ 我们的泰坦尼克.....
   I l☆ve you!
☆.°·▍▍.☆█☆.°★ 永不会沉没.
◥█▅▅██▅▅██▅▅▅▅███◤
我的主页:http://wphs.ik8.com我的网络硬盘:wphs.ys168.com
Email:wphs@ah163.com QQ:43500498(附加消息:中国DOS联盟)
Floor 3 Posted 2004-03-28 00:00 ·  中国 浙江 杭州 华数宽带
高级用户
★★
科学家
Credits 693
Posts 270
Joined 2003-07-21 12:00
23-year member
UID 7321
Gender Female
Status Offline
Yes, the command prompt is not DOS at all.
Floor 4 Posted 2004-03-28 00:00 ·  中国 重庆 电信
中级用户
Credits 262
Posts 32
Joined 2004-03-24 00:00
22-year member
UID 20967
Gender Male
Status Offline
Then what exactly is DOS??? My computer is running the WIN98 operating system.
Floor 5 Posted 2004-03-29 00:00 ·  中国 河南 安阳 联通
银牌会员
★★★
Credits 1,186
Posts 334
Joined 2003-05-30 00:00
23-year member
UID 2626
Gender Male
Status Offline
Actually they're all dos~~
Before entering 98 it's pure DOS, that is, DOS real mode, and of course after exiting it is too
The DOS in WINME 2000 XP should be called windowed DOS or emulated dos
winME also has DOS real mode, but you have to add a patch
Floor 6 Posted 2004-03-29 00:00 ·  美国
系统支持
★★★★★★
“新DOS时代”站长
Credits 27,736
Posts 10,521
Joined 2002-10-09 12:00
23-year member
UID 9
Status Offline
Wrong, that so-called "windowed DOS" is not DOS at all. It evolved from OS/2's "command prompt", because WinNT/2K/XP are based on OS/2, so it has nothing to do with DOS. And it's not emulated DOS either, though calling it emulated OS/2 might be more appropriate.
Wengier - 新DOS时代

欢迎大家来到我的“新DOS时代”网站,里面有各类DOS软件和资料,地址:
http://wendos.mycool.net/

E-Mail & MSN: wengierwu AT hotmail.com (最近比较忙,有事请联系DOSroot和雨露,谢谢!)

Floor 7 Posted 2004-03-29 00:00 ·  中国 广东 深圳 福田区 电信
银牌会员
★★
Credits 1,141
Posts 148
Joined 2004-03-08 00:00
22-year member
UID 19536
Gender Male
Status Offline
There are many kinds of DOS
Floor 8 Posted 2004-03-29 00:00 ·  美国
系统支持
★★★★★★
“新DOS时代”站长
Credits 27,736
Posts 10,521
Joined 2002-10-09 12:00
23-year member
UID 9
Status Offline
There are many kinds of DOS, such as MS-DOS, PC-DOS, FreeDOS, etc. But WinNT/2K/XP and the like are not DOS, but OS/2. They all have nothing to do with DOS.
Wengier - 新DOS时代

欢迎大家来到我的“新DOS时代”网站,里面有各类DOS软件和资料,地址:
http://wendos.mycool.net/

E-Mail & MSN: wengierwu AT hotmail.com (最近比较忙,有事请联系DOSroot和雨露,谢谢!)

Floor 9 Posted 2004-03-29 00:00 ·  中国 山东 日照 联通
钻石会员
★★★★★
Credits 10,056
Posts 3,041
Joined 2002-11-11 00:00
23-year member
UID 223
Gender Male
Status Offline
So that's how it is, Windows NT was actually based on OS/2
简单就是美
Floor 10 Posted 2004-03-30 00:00 ·  美国
系统支持
★★★★★★
“新DOS时代”站长
Credits 27,736
Posts 10,521
Joined 2002-10-09 12:00
23-year member
UID 9
Status Offline
MS was originally preparing to release MS OS/2 3.0, but later renamed and modified it into Windows NT 3.1 and released that..
Wengier - 新DOS时代

欢迎大家来到我的“新DOS时代”网站,里面有各类DOS软件和资料,地址:
http://wendos.mycool.net/

E-Mail & MSN: wengierwu AT hotmail.com (最近比较忙,有事请联系DOSroot和雨露,谢谢!)

Floor 11 Posted 2004-03-30 00:00 ·  中国 香港
管理员
★★★★
專業島民
Credits 4,869
Posts 1,633
Joined 2002-12-10 00:00
23-year member
UID 465
Gender Male
Status Offline
The following is quoted from Wengier's post at 2004-3-30 5:43:06:
MS was originally preparing to release MS OS/2 3.0, but later renamed and modified it into Windows NT 3.1 and released that..
That's not how it was......after MS released MS OS/2 1.31 it withdrew from OS/2 development, then took the OS/2 source code it had plus its own Win 3.1 source code and turned that into Win NT 3.1.......and originally win nt 3.1 wasn't called win nt 3.1..
我的網站:http://mw16.2ya.com/ 我的網誌: http://scrappedblog.blogspot.com/
~
我的Winamp正在播放的歌曲:
Floor 12 Posted 2004-03-30 00:00 ·  美国
系统支持
★★★★★★
“新DOS时代”站长
Credits 27,736
Posts 10,521
Joined 2002-10-09 12:00
23-year member
UID 9
Status Offline
Roy: You're the one who's wrong. Don't you know the agreement IBM and MS reached at the time? Originally IBM was supposed to release OS/2 2.0, and then MS was supposed to release OS/2 3.0. But later MS did not release OS/2 3.0. Instead, it modified and updated the earlier MS OS/2 1.x it had and released that as the first version of WinNT. Since the Windows version at the time was 3.1, and part of the Win3.1 code was also added, this version of WinNT was also given the name 3.1, but its actual positioning was basically the same thing as the originally planned OS/2 3.0.
Wengier - 新DOS时代

欢迎大家来到我的“新DOS时代”网站,里面有各类DOS软件和资料,地址:
http://wendos.mycool.net/

E-Mail & MSN: wengierwu AT hotmail.com (最近比较忙,有事请联系DOSroot和雨露,谢谢!)

Floor 13 Posted 2004-03-30 00:00 ·  中国 重庆 长寿区 电信
中级用户
Credits 262
Posts 32
Joined 2004-03-24 00:00
22-year member
UID 20967
Gender Male
Status Offline
Who's right and who's wrong? This is really giving me a headache!
Floor 14 Posted 2004-03-30 00:00 ·  中国 香港 有线电视
管理员
★★★★
專業島民
Credits 4,869
Posts 1,633
Joined 2002-12-10 00:00
23-year member
UID 465
Gender Male
Status Offline
The following is quoted from Wengier's post at 2004-3-30 6:55:19:
Roy:You're the one who's wrong. Don't you know the agreement IBM and MS reached at the time? Originally IBM was supposed to release OS/2 2.0, and then MS was supposed to release OS/2 3.0. But later MS did not release OS/2 3.0. Instead, it modified and updated the earlier MS OS/2 1.x it had and released that as the first version of WinNT. Since the Windows version at the time was 3.1, and part of the Win3.1 code was also added, this version of WinNT was also given the name 3.1, but its actual positioning was basically the same thing as the originally planned OS/2 3.0.

Things really are as you said........but did you look at the picture I posted?
In the picture is Windows NT (March 93 beta)'s BSOD(Blue Screen of Death).......
Pay attention to the version number.....it's v1.404!
v1 means the OS/2 1.x version (should be 1.31)
404 is the build number
我的網站:http://mw16.2ya.com/ 我的網誌: http://scrappedblog.blogspot.com/
~
我的Winamp正在播放的歌曲:
Floor 15 Posted 2004-03-30 00:00 ·  中国 浙江 金华 移动
初级用户
Credits 131
Posts 6
Joined 2004-03-30 00:00
22-year member
UID 21480
Gender Male
Status Offline
What is OS/2? Can you explain it more clearly?





Forum Jump: