China DOS Union

It feels that the development of the FreeDOS kernel is not very active

Originally posted by abcdos at 2006-11-17 02:06 AM:
Can DOS fully unleash the potential of today's fast CPUs?

Certainly
DOS has no restrictions from "device drivers" and other things, so it naturally performs best

Originally posted by beastie at 2004-7-27 12:00 AM:
Why do you keep praising M$-DOS, win3.x, 9x? Don't say you have their source codes. Be careful! Microsoft will sue these moderators. FreeBSD can completely replace FREEDOS. The main platform of FreeBSD is also PC.

I have an opinion on your way of speaking. Do you need the source code to praise a system? Okay, I won't praise MSDOS, WINDOWS. Let Microsoft reward me. Also, personal preferences are different, which is understandable. What replaces what is your idea. Everyone has their own ideas as long as they don't violate the law and morality.

The world is colorful, free, and open. You can accept or not accept my views.

Originally posted by beastie at 2004-7-24 12:00 AM:
Hehe, may I ask how many copies of the open source code for DOS are there? So it's still better to use free Linux and BSD, as the open source code is a thousand times or ten thousand times that of DOS.

Others can open source if they are willing, and it has nothing to do with you if they don't want to. What you want to say has nothing to do with me, but please don't make any personal attacks, okay? An operating system also has its own dignity

This, is a grave -_-
Digged up by ls -_-P
It seems there are quite a few open - source software under DOS
Unix - like systems are of course good (I only have it on my home machine)
It seems that Microsoft's things are all very bad
If you use it, FreeDOS is good to use for DOS

Studying hard! Just as the saying goes, simple doesn't necessarily mean bad, and complex doesn't necessarily mean good

DOS diehard

Support it, DOS is strong.

Under Windows, writing scripts is still inseparable from DOS, of course, if you don't want to use a Unix-like emulator!

DOS represents the bottom layer and directness, while Windows represents the high layer and easy understanding, which is closer to people's natural understanding.

So Windows should represent a development trend. It is born when DOS has developed to a certain extent and meets the real needs. Of course, all high-rise buildings are built on the development of bottom-layer technologies. The improvement of DOS can greatly improve Windows, etc.

Other things such as unixes, people pay more attention to the differences between them. I think that when the technology develops to a certain extent, there will definitely be a system that can include all the functions of the current operating systems. At that time, looking back, the development of the current OS is just a few legs supporting the majestic body of an elephant, all of which have made great contributions!

The so-called: separation after long union, union after long separation! It's an old truth since ancient times, and the development of OS will be like this too!

So free and open, inclusive is the direct driving force for the growth and expansion of modern OS in the future!

What you said upstairs makes sense, revealing the universal law of development of things.

Originally posted by makefool at 2003-9-19 00:00:
DOS represents simplicity, just like we are still using scythes to harvest and axes to cut trees in the IT era. Although it may not reflect modernization and industrialization, it is still useful when needed.

Look at the low efficiency of hard disk space utilization in current Windows software, and you will know whether DOS should be eliminated or not

I'm still a newbie, very interested in this, and hope everyone can help a lot!

Good

I love DOS. ..
Actually, there are some commands in DOS that desktop systems can't do. ..

Actually, DOS is very good. I like it very much, but I'm not proficient. Sweat·····