![]() |
China DOS Union-- Unite DOS · Advance DOS · Grow DOS --Union site: www.cn-dos.net Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum |
| Guest | Log in | Register | Members | Search | China DOS Union |
|
中国DOS联盟论坛 The time now is 2026-11-11 06:14 |
47,815 topics / 349,930 posts / today 0 new / 48,291 members |
| DOS批处理 & 脚本技术(批处理室) » [Discussion] A script for installing M$ patches on an internal network that cannot access the Internet |
| Printable Version 4,819 / 17 |
| Floor16 maya0su | Posted 2006-10-29 01:10 |
| 中级用户 Posts 131 Credits 241 | |
|
Interesting
I used to do it this way too I think net use xcopy call can solve the problem. On the server side, all we need to do is keep the patches updated in time. |
|
| Floor17 zhwvip | Posted 2006-10-29 01:24 |
| 初级用户 Posts 14 Credits 29 | |
|
Here, for patch updates I also use batch file updating.
After all, if you let more than 100 machines all update from int updata, it takes up a lot of network speed and is slow. It's better to download the patches locally and then update with a batch file. Conditions also differ from place to place. But I generally don't use net use virtual hard disk. I connect directly with \\xxx.xxx.xxx.1 What are the advantages and disadvantages of these 2 methods? |
|
| Floor18 yzz163 | Posted 2006-10-31 05:14 |
| 中级用户 Posts 96 Credits 335 | |
|
But I generally don't use net use virtual hard disk.
I connect directly with \\xxx.xxx.xxx.1 What are the advantages and disadvantages of these 2 methods? -------------------------------------------------- Just try it and you'll know. With the \\xxx.xxx.xxx.1 method, sometimes files cannot be copied normally (I have WIN95/98/2K/XP here), but after mapping it as a local drive there is no problem. The specific reason has not been found out. |
|
| Prev 1 2 |
|
[ Contact the Union admin team -
中国DOS联盟 -
Standard version ] Sponsored by ifanr Inc | © 2001–2023 |