China DOS Union

Interesting
I used to do it this way too
I think
net use
xcopy
call
can solve the problem. On the server side, all we need to do is keep the patches updated in time.

Here, for patch updates I also use batch file updating.
After all, if you let more than 100 machines all update from int updata,
it takes up a lot of network speed and is slow. It's better to download the patches locally
and then update with a batch file. Conditions also differ from place to place.
But I generally don't use net use virtual hard disk.
I connect directly with \\xxx.xxx.xxx.1
What are the advantages and disadvantages of these 2 methods?

But I generally don't use net use virtual hard disk.
I connect directly with \\xxx.xxx.xxx.1
What are the advantages and disadvantages of these 2 methods?
--------------------------------------------------

Just try it and you'll know.
With the \\xxx.xxx.xxx.1 method, sometimes files cannot be copied normally (I have WIN95/98/2K/XP here), but after mapping it as a local drive there is no problem.
The specific reason has not been found out.