China DOS Union

-- Unite DOS · Advance DOS · Grow DOS --

Union site: www.cn-dos.net　Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum
DOS stands for freedom, openness and progress. Let us work hard, learn from the openness and GNU spirit of FreeDOS and Linux, and together build and grow a free GNU GPL world!

Guest Register Log in Members Blogs Search Command Prompt Bash Upload Statistics

中国DOS联盟论坛
The time now is 2026-07-25 18:23

Welcome new member proton687　 RSS
48,030 topics / 350,112 posts / today 1 new / 48,239 members 不转换/ 简体中文/ 繁體中文（台灣）/ 繁體中文（香港）

中国DOS联盟论坛 » DOS学习入门 & 精彩文章（教学室） » The most stable one among partition software is FDISK!? View 3,432　Replies 16

Original Poster Posted 2004-02-28 00:00　·　中国广东河源电信

walu

高级用户

★★

Credits 916
Posts 201
Joined 2003-05-04 00:00
23-year member
UID 1849
Gender Male

Status Offline

Some people say that after partitioning the hard disk with PQmagic, DM, DISKGEN, etc., when there is a large amount of data in the partition, various compatibility problems will occur. Only using Microsoft's FDISK will not have such situations. But as far as I know, FDISK partitions very slowly because it performs a surface check of the hard disk, while other software skips this check and is much faster. In fact, for a new hard disk, there is no need for a surface check.

Everyone, based on your own practice, tell us whether it is really only FDISK partitioning that is stable?

Floor 2 Posted 2004-11-21 00:00　·　中国山东济宁电信

defrag

中级用户

★★★

痴迷ＤＯＳ者

Credits 456
Posts 570
Joined 2004-10-09 00:00
21-year member
UID 32281
Gender Male

Status Offline

fdisk is said to be for partition detection, but it's overwriting data clusters

DOS不是万能的，没有DOS是万万不能的
自古系统谁无死？留取胆清照汗青!uploadImages/20035317345478982.png

Floor 3 Posted 2004-11-21 00:00　·　中国山东济宁电信

defrag

中级用户

★★★

痴迷ＤＯＳ者

Credits 456
Posts 570
Joined 2004-10-09 00:00
21-year member
UID 32281
Gender Male

Status Offline

Still, fdisk and gdisk are relatively stable

DOS不是万能的，没有DOS是万万不能的
自古系统谁无死？留取胆清照汗青!uploadImages/20035317345478982.png

Floor 4 Posted 2004-11-22 00:00　·　中国福建福州电信

cn_archer

元老会员

★★★

农民

Credits 2,903
Posts 991
Joined 2003-07-23 00:00
23-year member
UID 7391
Gender Male
From 福建省

Status Offline

New hard drives, I use DM or PQ. For problematic hard drives, I also use DM or PQ. The several hard drives I encountered, FDISK simply couldn't partition them. After using DM or PQ to ignore the bad sector check and then partition, they can still be used somewhat.

艰难奋长戟，万古用一夫

中国DOS联盟 http://www.cn-dos.net 欢迎大家来共同学习
我的MSN&E-Mail cn_archer@hotmail.com QQ 56049418

Floor 5 Posted 2004-11-24 00:00　·　中国广西桂林电信

yvhihdhq

初级用户

★

Credits 190
Posts 16
Joined 2004-01-25 00:00
22-year member
UID 16061
Gender Male

Status Offline

It is best to use fdisk to partition a new hard disk

Floor 6 Posted 2004-11-25 00:00　·　中国福建福州电信

cn_archer

元老会员

★★★

农民

Credits 2,903
Posts 991
Joined 2003-07-23 00:00
23-year member
UID 7391
Gender Male
From 福建省

Status Offline

Generally speaking, when I buy a new hard drive, I will get a detection tool of that brand of hard drive to check for bad sectors. Need I say more if there are bad sectors? It doesn't matter what software I use to partition if there are no bad sectors. But FDISK is really too slow, especially when partitioning a 250G hard drive...

艰难奋长戟，万古用一夫

中国DOS联盟 http://www.cn-dos.net 欢迎大家来共同学习
我的MSN&E-Mail cn_archer@hotmail.com QQ 56049418

Floor 7 Posted 2004-11-27 00:00　·　中国重庆渝中区电信

bush

银牌会员

★★★

Credits 2,165
Posts 730
Joined 2004-04-21 00:00
22-year member
UID 22966
Gender Male

Status Offline

My view is also: For a new hard drive, use fdisk; for problematic ones, use: DG, DM

Floor 8 Posted 2004-12-19 00:00　·　中国山东济宁电信

defrag

中级用户

★★★

痴迷ＤＯＳ者

Credits 456
Posts 570
Joined 2004-10-09 00:00
21-year member
UID 32281
Gender Male

Status Offline

The following is a quote from cn_archer's post on 2004-11-22 10:36:10:

New hard drive, I use DM or PQ.
For problematic hard drives, I also use DM or PQ. I encountered several hard drives where FDISK simply couldn't partition them. After using DM or PQ to ignore bad sector checks and then partitioning, they can still be used temporarily.

FDISK /ACTOK

DOS不是万能的，没有DOS是万万不能的
自古系统谁无死？留取胆清照汗青!uploadImages/20035317345478982.png

Floor 9 Posted 2005-01-11 00:00　·　中国河南洛阳洛宁县联通

qingfengxvlai

初级用户

★

Credits 114
Posts 6
Joined 2005-01-03 00:00
21-year member
UID 35096
Gender Male

Status Offline

The following is the statement made by cn_archer on November 22, 2004 at 10:36:10:

For a new hard drive, I use DM or PQ.
For a problematic hard drive, I also use DM or PQ. I have encountered several hard drives where FDISK simply cannot partition them. After ignoring the bad sector check and partitioning with DM or PQ, they can still be used for the time being.

Floor 10 Posted 2005-01-16 00:00　·　中国广西柳州柳北区电信

sanmou

初级用户

★

Credits 106
Posts 3
Joined 2005-01-16 00:00
21-year member
UID 35374
Gender Male

Status Offline

The following is the speech of cn_archer on 2004-11-25 0:53:20:

Generally speaking, when I buy a new hard drive, I will get a detection tool of that brand of hard drive to check if there are bad sectors. If there are bad sectors, there is no need to say more.
If there are no bad sectors, it doesn't matter which software is used for partitioning.
But FDISK is really too slow, especially when partitioning a 250G hard drive...

Yes. For example, Seagate uses Seatools, and IBM uses DFT for detection. Then use DM for quick partitioning, and then install Windows into the system for formatting. For systems like 2000, XP, etc., it is best to directly use their partitioning and formatting functions.

Floor 11 Posted 2005-01-26 00:00　·　中国江西上饶电信

97040240

初级用户

★

Credits 128
Posts 7
Joined 2004-08-27 00:00
21-year member
UID 30789
Gender Male

Status Offline

If it's FDisk for a new hard disk. If the hard disk has data, I think Partition Magic is the best

Floor 12 Posted 2005-01-28 00:00　·　中国广东广州白云区电信

simson2010

初级用户

★

Credits 104
Posts 2
Joined 2005-01-28 00:00
21-year member
UID 35723
Gender Male

Status Offline

160G~{5DS2EL#,SC~}XP~{9bFt#,R27V2;AK#,V;HO3v~}137G~{#,~}~{UbJGJ2C4T-Rr#?~}

Floor 13 Posted 2005-01-29 00:00　·　中国山东临沂联通

liuxishu

初级用户

★

Credits 102
Posts 1
Joined 2005-01-29 00:00
21-year member
UID 35749
Gender Male

Status Offline

Using FDISK is really cool

Floor 14 Posted 2005-01-30 00:00　·　中国上海电信

DOSforever

金牌会员

★★★★

Credits 4,639
Posts 2,239
Joined 2005-01-30 00:00
21-year member
UID 35785
Gender Male

Status Offline

The following is a quote from defrag's post on December 19, 2004 at 18:57:34:
>

FDISK /ACTOK

Some materials say that this parameter allows FDISK to skip disk checking, which can speed up the partitioning speed, similar to the quick format of DM. But I have tried many times and it is still ineffective. The percentage still jumps slowly, the same as when not using this parameter.
In the past, I was also a firm user of FDISK. I always felt that the partitions divided by it were "pure" a bit. Seeing that some third-party partitioning software can divide a hard drive so quickly, I always feel a little "hastily done" and uneasy. But as the hard drive capacity continues to increase, I no longer have the patience to use FDISK. Moreover, if you want to install multiple operating systems, FDISK cannot meet certain specific requirements.

DOS倒下了，但永远不死
DOS NEVER DIES !

投票调查：
http://www.cn-dos.net/forum/viewthread.php?tid=46187

本人尚未解决的疑难问题：
http://www.cn-dos.net/forum/viewthread.php?tid=15135
http://www.cn-dos.net/forum/viewthread.php?tid=47663
http://www.cn-dos.net/forum/viewthread.php?tid=48747

Floor 15 Posted 2006-04-15 22:40　·　中国浙江宁波电信

zjnbwdj

中级用户

★★

Credits 300
Posts 137
Joined 2005-11-04 02:00
20-year member
UID 44559
Gender Male

Status Offline

SFDISK... Why doesn't anyone talk about it? I've been using it to partition, it's fast, intuitive, and has high space utilization. Unlike FDISK, which leaves remaining space after partitioning. SFDISK allows multiple primary partitions, while FDISK only allows one primary partition.

Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favorites

Forum Jump: