|
knowink
初级用户
 
积分 104
发帖 2
注册 2004-11-5
状态 离线
|
『第 61 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
FreeDOS很不错啊,我最近一直在用,还没有发现什么问题。因为Free,所以我喜欢!!
FreeDOS is pretty good. I've been using it recently and haven't found any problems yet. Because it's free, so I like it!
|
|
2004-11-5 00:00 |
|
|
郭恒
中级用户
  
积分 225
发帖 39
注册 2004-10-6
状态 离线
|
『第 62 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
我个人认为,任何一套系统软件,应该能与“老的系统”兼容,这从“WINDOWS”与“PS/2”之争,及“IBM”与“苹果公司”之争就可以看出来,我个人不是很认同Linux,因为它很少有第三方的商家基于它写“游戏”和“商用程序”。目前据我的认识,在市场上还没有某某游戏是基于Linux平台的。很多开发者是由于WINDOWS不跟解决问题,而很迫选择Linux。
Personally, I think any set of system software should be compatible with "old systems", which can be seen from the "WINDOWS" vs. "PS/2" dispute and the "IBM" vs. Apple Inc. dispute. Personally, I don't quite agree with Linux because there are few third-party businesses writing "games" and "commercial programs" based on it. Currently, as far as I know, there are no certain games based on the Linux platform in the market. Many developers are forced to choose Linux because Windows doesn't solve the problem.
|
|
2004-11-25 00:00 |
|
|
zhongz
初级用户
 
积分 102
发帖 1
注册 2004-11-27
状态 离线
|
『第 63 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
现在通常都是新系统兼容老系统的,,,,win2003都运行win95的程序的.
Linux的新版本的内核都能很好地运行在比较旧的发版上,Mac OS我就不清楚
"很少有第三方的商家基于它写“游戏”和“商用程序”。"
老实说Linux在游戏方面是差点,现在是纯Linux下的又比较出名的只有Q3吧.所以要玩游戏?回windows吧.商用程序??Linux强调的就是free.如果商用程序满天飞,我还不如用回windows?一样是要钱嘛.
"很多开发者是由于WINDOWS不跟解决问题,而很迫选择Linux。"??
Linux和Windows它们自己都有自己的特点.开发是看那个系统比较适合.才选那个.而不是被迫选...老实说一句无论是windows还是Linux的可用性和实用性都比dos好上N(双位数)倍,感觉现在还用dos是一种情结吧.
用你的脑子想清楚才好说话,,,,引用某论坛里的一句话"自己不会就不要乱说,免得教坏别人了"
Nowadays, it's usually that new systems are compatible with old ones,,,, Win2003 can run programs of Win95.
The new versions of Linux kernels can run well on relatively old releases. I don't know about Mac OS.
"There are very few third - party businesses writing 'games' and 'commercial programs' based on it."
To be honest, Linux is a bit weak in terms of games. Currently, the only relatively well - known one under pure Linux is Q3. So if you want to play games? Go back to Windows. Commercial programs?? Linux emphasizes free. If commercial programs are everywhere, I might as well go back to Windows? It's the same as having to pay money.
"Many developers choose Linux because Windows doesn't solve the problem, and they are very forced to choose Linux."??
Linux and Windows each have their own characteristics. Development is to choose the system that is more suitable. It's not a forced choice... To be honest, both Windows and Linux are N (double - digit) times more usable and practical than DOS. It feels that using DOS now is a kind of complex.
Use your brain to think clearly before speaking,,,, Quote a sentence from a certain forum "Don't talk randomly if you don't know, lest you mislead others."
|
|
2004-11-27 00:00 |
|
|
gmy
版主
        操作系统爱好者
积分 1113
发帖 392
注册 2002-11-11
状态 离线
|
『第 64 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
FreeDOS出了50KB版,只有两个文件(如果不含引导部分只有40KB),居然能运行GHOST8.2。原贴:http://bbs.wuyou.com/cgi-bin/topic.cgi?forum=34&topic=7034
FreeDOS has a 50KB version, with only two files (if the boot part is not included, it's only 40KB), and it can actually run GHOST8.2. Original post: http://bbs.wuyou.com/cgi-bin/topic.cgi?forum=34&topic=7034
|

DOS之家 http://doshome.com 站长 葛明阳 |
|
2005-2-19 00:00 |
|
|
defrag
中级用户
   痴迷DOS者
积分 456
发帖 570
注册 2004-10-9
状态 离线
|
『第 65 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
10 PRINT "或許,DOS真的會象UNIx一樣,在個人計算機上走齣煇煌年代後被人護士"
20 PRINT "或許,它又會走進一個煇煌年代。"
30 PRINT "或許,真的有人象在舊DOS年代一樣,而不琯是否自由開放,是否。。。"
40 PRINT "或許,自由開放會使它在DOS係統界一去不復返。"
50 PRINT "或許,外囯在閙“自由開放革命”,WENGIER是他們的支持著,有人也會反對,比如我。"
60 PRINT "或許,,,,,,,"
70 PRINT "DEFRAG的補充:"
80 PRINT "我是自由開放的反對者,因為40"
10 PRINT "Maybe, DOS will really be like UNIX, after a glorious era on personal computers, it will be neglected"
20 PRINT "Maybe, it will enter another glorious era."
30 PRINT "Maybe, really there are people like in the old DOS era, regardless of whether it is free and open, whether..."
40 PRINT "Maybe, free and open will make it never return in the DOS system world."
50 PRINT "Maybe, foreign countries are having the 'free and open revolution', WENGIER is their supporter, some people will also oppose, such as me."
60 PRINT "Maybe, ............"
70 PRINT "Supplementary of DEFRAG:"
80 PRINT "I am an opponent of free and open, because 40"
|

DOS不是万能的,没有DOS是万万不能的
自古系统谁无死?留取胆清照汗青!uploadImages/20035317345478982.png |
|
2005-2-19 00:00 |
|
|
jacky0501
新手上路

积分 6
发帖 2
注册 2005-8-8 来自 赣州
状态 离线
|
|
2005-8-8 11:25 |
|
|
brglng
银牌会员
     永遠的DOS~~~
积分 1200
发帖 466
注册 2005-2-1 来自 上海
状态 离线
|
『第 67 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
要改进DOS的命令解释器,让它的功能能像Unix那么强大(我想应该不难吧?)
对于那些新技术(USB、NTFS、即插即用等等)应该在内核就有支持
应该加紧开发出32位内核的DOS
M$不开发了,不然的话DOS仍然继续辉煌。凭M$强大的实力完全可以开发出这样的DOS。
To improve the command interpreter of DOS so that its functions can be as powerful as Unix (I think it should be not difficult, right?)
For those new technologies (USB, NTFS, plug and play, etc.), there should be support in the kernel.
We should step up the development of a 32-bit kernel DOS.
M$ doesn't develop it, otherwise DOS would still continue to be glorious. With M$'s strong strength, it can fully develop such a DOS.
|

32位才是DOS未来的希望
个人网志:http://sololand.moe |
|
2005-8-8 11:47 |
|
|
maya0su
中级用户
  
积分 241
发帖 131
注册 2005-9-28
状态 离线
|
『第 68 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
Dark-Destroy 说他不是中国人,我很伤感情,台湾人不是中国人?假如我是论坛管理员,我会告诉他走开,一个连自己属于哪个过家都分不清楚的人,有留的必要吗?
我很遗憾的告诉Dark-Destroy :假如你固执的认为你不是中国人,那么请你离开,这里不欢迎你。
真的好遗憾,我第一次从一个台湾人亲自说他不是中国人,悲哀……
Dark-Destroy said he is not Chinese, which really hurts my feelings. Are Taiwanese not Chinese? If I were a forum administrator, I would tell him to go away. Is there any need to stay for someone who doesn't even know which country he belongs to?
I regretfully tell Dark-Destroy: If you stubbornly think you are not Chinese, then please leave, you are not welcome here.
It's really sad. I first heard a Taiwanese person personally say he is not Chinese, so sad...
|

房东说:这娃是个好孩子! |
|
2005-10-31 16:41 |
|
|
lucky9981
初级用户
 
积分 52
发帖 26
注册 2005-11-19
状态 离线
|
『第 69 楼』:
目前
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
目前,unix,linux,dos,apple,os/2还是高手的专业的领域.
用它的时侯,大多在黑洞洞的屏幕上敲入难懂的字符,你说可以大众化吗?
只有大众化操系统,才具有不可抵挡的力量,全世界人都认可它.
1、DOS要发展,突破1M基本内存才是关键,如果说加一些xms,dpmi等来管理的吧,不算是突破,我是指在正常的情况下,比如说,任何程序都可以加载到1G上上的高端内存.内存管理,应是dos自身应带有的功能,这样,让大型游戏等大型应用程序的运行成为可能。
2、dos要发展,提供一个可友善的界面者重要的条件.没有一个友善的界面,又如中不懂计算机的人去应用它呢?难道叫他们在dos上敲入一些专业的字符来启动程序吗?
3、DOS要发展,必须具有多任务功能。单一任务操作系统,又如何叫用户运行多个程序?比如说,用户想边听歌,又打文档或者其他事情。DOS必须在核心里实现多任务功能,而不是用TSR的方式来模拟,也不是通过dosshell的方式来实现。这些,我认为不算是多任务。我认识所谓的多任务,是由操作系统自身管理,任何应用程序的运行,都是平列的。只不过在前台或者后台之后,前台的,就是可以看见的。后台的,就是看不见的。多任务,就是将后台的,调到前台的来。其实,不管后台或前台的,它们还是一样正在运行的。DOS多任务的功能,不能只依靠于图形系统,比如X-window。
4、DOS发展,必须实现真正的网络功能。DOS应在自身实现网络功能,而不是通过外面加载网络程序的形式来实现,我认为,网络功能,应是操作系统不可分离的重要组成部分,启动以后就有的功能,而不是通过启动后另外加载的。有了网络,我们可以在DOS下打游戏,可以上internet.可以与全世界的人相通。
5、DOS要发展,必展实现多用户功能。现在的DOS,都是单用户的。我认为,所谓的多用户,就是指一个DOS系统,可以登录多个用户,这些用户,可能来自于自身一台计算机的登录,也可能来自局域网上来的用户,更有可能是来自internet上来的用户。DOS,本身就应该像个服务器,同时,也相当于一个客户端。与世界任务一个DOS相通,只要有身份验证,就可能与全世界的人相通。
6。DOS的发展,最终要实现商业化,单依靠一些自由的力量是难以实现如些重大的责任,只有在商业化的条件后,人们才有动力有压力去升级它,维护它,把它作为一种责任,一种抱负。如果只靠一点喜欢在里面玩玩,又如何能给它来多大的推动作用呢?
7、DOS的发展,要集成游戏功能和媒体解码功能.只有集成这些,人们才能在此平台上,很方便的开发游戏,很方便的很用各种各样的媒体.一个操作系统,首先要有可玩性,再谈可用性,如果一个系统,连游戏开发商都不愿意加入这个行列,我们又如何来谈得上为其发展呢?
任重道远...
时代的发展,能否唤呼出能担当此重担的hero?...
现在,windows已录遍及全世界,即使能做到windows平等地位,又叫人们如何去选择他们之一?人们在考虑...
Currently, Unix, Linux, DOS, Apple, OS/2 are still in the domain of experts.
When using them, most of the time, you type in incomprehensible characters on the pitch-black screen. Can it be popularized?
Only a popularized operating system has an irresistible force and is recognized by people all over the world.
1. For the development of DOS, breaking through the 1M basic memory is the key. If it is just adding some XMS, DPMI, etc. to manage, it is not a breakthrough. I mean, under normal circumstances, for example, any program can be loaded into the high-end memory above 1G. Memory management should be a function that DOS itself should have, so that the operation of large games and other large applications can be made possible.
2. For the development of DOS, providing a friendly interface is an important condition. Without a friendly interface, how can people who don't understand computers use it?难道 ask them to type in some professional characters on DOS to start programs?
3. For the development of DOS, it must have multi-tasking function. How can a single-task operating system make users run multiple programs? For example, a user wants to listen to music while typing a document or other things. DOS must implement the multi-tasking function in the core, not simulate it by means of TSR, nor implement it through the DOSSHELL method. These, I don't think are multi-tasking. I think the so-called multi-tasking is that the operating system itself manages, and the operation of any application program is parallel. It's just that it is in the foreground or background. The one in the foreground is visible. The one in the background is invisible. Multi-tasking is to bring the background one to the foreground. In fact, whether it is in the background or the foreground, they are still running the same. The multi-tasking function of DOS cannot only rely on the graphics system, such as X-window.
4. For the development of DOS, it must realize the real network function. DOS should realize the network function in itself, not in the form of loading network programs from outside. I think the network function should be an important inseparable part of the operating system, a function that is available after startup, not a function that is loaded additionally after startup. With the network, we can play games under DOS, can access the Internet. Can communicate with people all over the world.
5. For the development of DOS, it must realize the multi-user function. The current DOS is all single-user. I think the so-called multi-user means that one DOS system can log in multiple users. These users may come from the login of their own computer, may also come from users on the local area network, and more likely come from users on the Internet. DOS itself should be like a server and also like a client. It can communicate with any DOS in the world, as long as there is identity authentication, it can communicate with people all over the world.
6. For the development of DOS, it must eventually realize commercialization. Relying solely on some free forces is difficult to fulfill such a重大 responsibility. Only under the condition of commercialization can people have the motivation and pressure to upgrade it, maintain it, and take it as a responsibility and an ambition. If it only relies on some people who like to play in it, how can it give much impetus to it?
7. For the development of DOS, it should integrate game functions and media decoding functions. Only by integrating these can people develop games very conveniently on this platform and use various media very conveniently. An operating system should first have playability, and then talk about usability. If a system even game developers are not willing to join this ranks, how can we talk about its development?
The road is long and arduous...
Can the development of the times call out the hero who can take on this heavy burden...
Now, Windows has spread all over the world. Even if it can achieve the equal status of Windows, how can people choose among them? People are thinking...
|
|
2005-11-20 18:50 |
|
|
ysc
初级用户
 
积分 118
发帖 55
注册 2005-11-26
状态 离线
|
|
2005-11-27 09:49 |
|
|
kdlipm
初级用户
 
积分 31
发帖 16
注册 2005-12-4
状态 离线
|
『第 71 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
lucky9981,说的真好,很透彻!!支持!!
lucky9981, what you said is really good and very thorough!! Support!!
|
|
2005-12-5 01:37 |
|
|
seanruan
新手上路

积分 2
发帖 1
注册 2005-12-11
状态 离线
|
『第 72 楼』:
又遇到一个泛政治的
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
Originally posted by baobolz at 2003-4-4 00:00:
楼上的:
冒昧地问一下你是哪个国家的人,为什么中文学得这么好?
那个国家的人?跟中文好有啥子关系?君不见美国人英文好,马来人英文也行,澳洲人英文也不错?有听说英国人去问人家英文好的是哪一国人吗?
我看是引诱人家陷入争辩的开始。看吧,果然不假。简直泛政治到极点。
这麽说吧,有新加坡的清廉、台湾的务实与弹性、中国的拼劲与规模。就可以建设起一个强大的国家。
当初美国对日本作战时,杀了一堆黄皮肤的。他们根本分不清谁是谁。国家强大,就有整合的空间,可以建设一个巨大的文化圈。犯不着跟那些行将就木的老头子一样『非我族类其心必异』。
成天同中求异,再这样窝里反下去,就得求美国人带你去叁观他们的月球罗~
唉,这里不是政治版,不多说罗!忘了以华制华是老美的专长?
Originally posted by baobolz at 2003-4-4 00:00:
Upstairs:
I venture to ask which country you are from, why do you have such a good command of Chinese?
Which country you are from? What does that have to do with having a good command of Chinese? Don't you see that Americans have good English, Malaysians also have good English, and Australians also have good English? Have you heard of an Englishman asking someone of which country the person with good English is from?
I think this is the beginning of luring people into an argument. See, it's indeed not false. It's simply extremely politicized.
Let me put it this way, with the integrity of Singapore, the pragmatism and flexibility of Taiwan, and the drive and scale of China, we can build a powerful country.
When the United States was fighting Japan, they killed a bunch of people with yellow skin. They couldn't even tell who was who. When a country is powerful, there is room for integration, and we can build a huge cultural circle. There's no need to be like those old men on their last legs who say "Those not of our clan must have different hearts".
All day long seeking differences among the same, if we continue to fight within, we'll have to ask the Americans to take you to visit their moon rover~
Alas, this is not a political forum, so I won't say more! Forgot that using Chinese against Chinese is the specialty of the Americans?
|
|
2005-12-11 05:37 |
|
|
hetao
初级用户
 
积分 175
发帖 64
注册 2005-9-15
状态 离线
|
『第 73 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
『第 69 楼』: 目前
目前,unix,linux,dos,apple,os/2还是高手的专业的领域.
用它的时侯,大多在黑洞洞的屏幕上敲入难懂的字符,你说可以大众化吗?
只有大众化操系统,才具有不可抵挡的力量,全世界人都认可它.
1、DOS要发展,突破1M基本内存才是关键,如果说加一些xms,dpmi等来管理的吧,不算是突破,我是指在正常的情况下,比如说,任何程序都可以加载到1G上上的高端内存.内存管理,应是dos自身应带有的功能,这样,让大型游戏等大型应用程序的运行成为可能。
2、dos要发展,提供一个可友善的界面者重要的条件.没有一个友善的界面,又如中不懂计算机的人去应用它呢?难道叫他们在dos上敲入一些专业的字符来启动程序吗?
3、DOS要发展,必须具有多任务功能。单一任务操作系统,又如何叫用户运行多个程序?比如说,用户想边听歌,又打文档或者其他事情。DOS必须在核心里实现多任务功能,而不是用TSR的方式来模拟,也不是通过dosshell的方式来实现。这些,我认为不算是多任务。我认识所谓的多任务,是由操作系统自身管理,任何应用程序的运行,都是平列的。只不过在前台或者后台之后,前台的,就是可以看见的。后台的,就是看不见的。多任务,就是将后台的,调到前台的来。其实,不管后台或前台的,它们还是一样正在运行的。DOS多任务的功能,不能只依靠于图形系统,比如X-window。
4、DOS发展,必须实现真正的网络功能。DOS应在自身实现网络功能,而不是通过外面加载网络程序的形式来实现,我认为,网络功能,应是操作系统不可分离的重要组成部分,启动以后就有的功能,而不是通过启动后另外加载的。有了网络,我们可以在DOS下打游戏,可以上internet.可以与全世界的人相通。
5、DOS要发展,必展实现多用户功能。现在的DOS,都是单用户的。我认为,所谓的多用户,就是指一个DOS系统,可以登录多个用户,这些用户,可能来自于自身一台计算机的登录,也可能来自局域网上来的用户,更有可能是来自internet上来的用户。DOS,本身就应该像个服务器,同时,也相当于一个客户端。与世界任务一个DOS相通,只要有身份验证,就可能与全世界的人相通。
6。DOS的发展,最终要实现商业化,单依靠一些自由的力量是难以实现如些重大的责任,只有在商业化的条件后,人们才有动力有压力去升级它,维护它,把它作为一种责任,一种抱负。如果只靠一点喜欢在里面玩玩,又如何能给它来多大的推动作用呢?
7、DOS的发展,要集成游戏功能和媒体解码功能.只有集成这些,人们才能在此平台上,很方便的开发游戏,很方便的很用各种各样的媒体.一个操作系统,首先要有可玩性,再谈可用性,如果一个系统,连游戏开发商都不愿意加入这个行列,我们又如何来谈得上为其发展呢?
任重道远...
时代的发展,能否唤呼出能担当此重担的hero?...
现在,windows已录遍及全世界,即使能做到windows平等地位,又叫人们如何去选择他们之一?人们在考虑...
感叹!!!
DOS要发展谁能担此重任啊,要发展DOS不是光说就行,要现在就行动起来,寻求发展模式,组建开发团队,组建开发团队,组建开发团队,组建开发团队。像Linux一样
Post #69: Currently
Currently, Unix, Linux, DOS, Apple, OS/2 are still the professional domains of experts.
When using them, most of the time you type in hard-to-understand characters on the pitch-black screen. Can it be popularized?
Only a popularized operating system has an irresistible force and is recognized by people all over the world.
1. For DOS to develop, breaking through the 1M basic memory is the key. If it's just adding some XMS, DPMI, etc. to manage, it's not a breakthrough. I mean, in a normal situation, for example, any program can be loaded into the high-end memory above 1G. Memory management should be a function that DOS itself should have, so that the operation of large games and other large applications can be made possible.
2. For DOS to develop, providing a friendly interface is an important condition. Without a friendly interface, how can people who don't understand computers use it?难道叫 them type in some professional characters on DOS to start programs?
3. For DOS to develop, it must have multi-tasking function. How can a single-task operating system make users run multiple programs? For example, a user wants to listen to music while typing a document or doing other things. DOS must implement the multi-tasking function in the core, not by simulating it in the form of TSR, nor by implementing it through the DOSSHELL method. These, I don't think are multi-tasking. I think the so-called multi-tasking means that it is managed by the operating system itself, and the operation of any application program is parallel. Only whether it is in the foreground or the background. The foreground is visible, and the background is invisible. Multi-tasking is to bring the background to the foreground. In fact, whether it is the background or the foreground, they are all running the same. The multi-tasking function of DOS cannot only rely on the graphics system, such as X-window.
4. For DOS to develop, it must realize real network function. DOS should implement the network function in itself, not in the form of loading a network program from the outside. I think the network function should be an important inseparable part of the operating system, a function that is available after startup, not a function that is loaded separately after startup. With the network, we can play games under DOS, surf the Internet, and communicate with people all over the world.
5. For DOS to develop, it must realize multi-user function. The current DOS is all single-user. I think the so-called multi-user means that one DOS system can log in multiple users. These users may come from the login of their own computer, may come from users on the local area network, and may even come from users on the Internet. DOS itself should be like a server and also like a client. It can communicate with any DOS in the world, as long as there is identity authentication, it can communicate with people all over the world.
6. For the development of DOS, it must finally realize commercialization. Relying solely on some free forces is difficult to fulfill such a重大 responsibility. Only under the condition of commercialization can people have the motivation and pressure to upgrade it, maintain it, and take it as a responsibility and an ambition. If it's just for some people to play around, how can it be promoted greatly?
7. For the development of DOS, it should integrate game functions and media decoding functions. Only by integrating these can people develop games very conveniently on this platform and use various media very conveniently. An operating system should first have playability, and then talk about usability. If a system doesn't even attract game developers to join this circle, how can we talk about its development?
A long way to go...
Can the development of the times call out the hero who can shoulder this heavy burden?...
Now, Windows has spread all over the world. Even if it can reach the equal status of Windows, how can people choose among them? People are thinking...
Sigh!!!
Who can take on the heavy responsibility for the development of DOS? To develop DOS is not just talking, but to take action now, seek the development model, and form a development team, form a development team, form a development team, form a development team. Just like Linux
|
|
2006-1-29 09:56 |
|
|
hetao
初级用户
 
积分 175
发帖 64
注册 2005-9-15
状态 离线
|
『第 74 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
转:
littlekiss
新手上路
积分 3
发帖 3
注册 2005-10-29
状态 离线 『第 19 楼』:
linux,我一般出了除了玩游戏和用ppt以外是不进win的,我逛到之里是因为好奇,没想到还有一个dos时代的拥护着,我对dos不太了解,顶多也就知道些命令,但我看了半天论坛也没有找到为什么ms当年要放弃dos的原因?不要说仅仅是因为图型化,那大概只是商业上,linux下的xwindows其实也是很垃圾的,但我们看到许多服务器上跑的是linux或者其它的类unix,至于多dos,我想应该不用说什么了,至于Pc,基本上是ms一家独大,dos只是做为他的辅助,或者说只是做为管理员或者操作员的辅助而存在。我不是抵毁dos,我只想说明的是,dos曾经如此的风光,但是现实却是如此,dos从大到小,而linux却从小到大。其中的原由恐怕非常复杂。
Transfer:
littlekiss
Newcomer
Points 3
Posts 3
Registered 2005-10-29
Status Offline 『Building 19』:
Linux, I generally don't enter Windows except for playing games and using PPT. I came here because of curiosity. I didn't expect there to be also a supporter of the DOS era. I don't know much about DOS, at most I only know some commands. But I have looked at the forum for a long time and haven't found the reason why MS gave up DOS back then? Don't say it's just because of the graphical interface, that's probably just on the business side. The XWindows under Linux is actually very rubbish, but we see that many servers run Linux or other Unix-like systems. As for multi-DOS, I think there's no need to say anything. As for PCs, basically MS is dominant alone, and DOS is just used as his auxiliary, or just exists as an auxiliary for administrators or operators. I'm not denigrating DOS, I just want to show that DOS was once so glorious, but the reality is like this. DOS went from big to small, while Linux went from small to big. The reasons behind it are恐怕 very complicated.
|
|
2006-1-29 10:02 |
|
|
henrya2
中级用户
  
积分 486
发帖 171
注册 2006-2-12
状态 离线
|
|
2006-2-25 19:47 |
|
|