中国DOS联盟

1. I didn't understand this sentence...

File monitoring is not done with batch processing, that would be ridiculous, don't get it wrong everyone,

2. For infective viruses, there is always a source, a trigger point for the virus to become active.
Its beginning must be a main body, don't let the main body remain on the machine...
And yet have to do things normally...
Regarding prevention when watching BLUEMOVIE.net, I think my own method is okay.
But it's nothing special, so I won't say it.
It is suggested that everyone discuss, there are many ways of virus infection, let's classify them.
Formulate more suitable methods one by one. Of course, the mischievous classmates are coming out to find loopholes.

Last edited by 523066680 on 2009-9-4 at 03:43 ]

Good stuff, worthy of in-depth research and study.

Well, the currently popular proactive defense, using the whitelist method is feasible, but one needs to be quite familiar with the parent-child processes of the system. But even so, it's very troublesome when debugging software frequently because there are always reminders. I tried it, and I was exhausted in a week. Although there are no viruses, it's very inconvenient to use - unless the usage environment is extremely single and only a few software are used daily... So, running bare is technically feasible, but it can't be popularized.

The functions of batch processing are really powerful!!!

Originally posted by plp626 at 2009-9-3 05:13:
Say goodbye to antivirus software, create a personalized green system
I don't know if it's appropriate to post this in this forum, but I think it's closely related to some batch processing commands, such as reg, Secedit, cacls, etc.
First post and see...

You should choose a suitable antivirus software instead of saying goodbye to it. In fact, most such software does not have subjective restrictions on user functions to achieve the purpose, and the occupation of system resources is also adjustable. But most users simply can't understand some settings of antivirus software, so these software seem very hateful. Of course, there are also commercial factors in it. For example, the original Avira AntiVir, the earliest free version of the firewall's system monitoring function occupies less than 1MB of memory, <1% of CPU. But now the free version of this software has reached 30MB. But after setting, it's still the same as the original