|
aoon
初级用户
 
积分 122
发帖 47
注册 2006-1-3
状态 离线
|
『楼 主』:
求助:smartdrv.exe?
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
smartdrv.exe的使用需要什么条件?
我准备在DOS下装系统,把C:盘所有的文件都删除了,结果运行smartdrv.exe时说用不了.
晕啊!现在只能进DOS了.
到底运行它还需要什么啊?EMM?COFIG?还是....
What conditions are required for the use of smartdrv.exe?
I'm preparing to install the system under DOS and deleted all files on the C: drive. As a result, when running smartdrv.exe, it said it couldn't be used.
Oh no! Now I can only enter DOS.
What exactly else is needed to run it? EMM? CONFIG? Or....
|
|
2006-2-12 23:03 |
|
|
DOSforever
金牌会员
     
积分 4639
发帖 2239
注册 2005-1-30
状态 离线
|
|
2006-2-13 12:09 |
|
|
JonePeng
金牌会员
      D◎$ Fαп
积分 4562
发帖 1883
注册 2004-1-19 来自 广东广州
状态 离线
|
『第 3 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
在Config.sys里至少要有一行 device=himem.sys
In Config.sys, there should be at least one line: device=himem.sys
|

----====≡≡≡≡ 我的至爱,永远是MSDOS!≡≡≡≡====----
|
|
2006-2-13 12:12 |
|
|
dato
高级用户
   
积分 916
发帖 377
注册 2004-3-8
状态 离线
|
『第 4 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
印象当中似乎没有它,当初好像是安装Win2k吧,光拷贝文件就花了3个多小时(不知道是不是作梦)
另外似乎硬盘簇采用512bit也会导致加载smartdrv却如何没有加载时的效果一样
It seems that I didn't have it in my memory. I remember when I installed Win2k, it took more than 3 hours just to copy the files (I don't know if it was a dream).
Also, it seems that if the hard disk cluster uses 512 bits, loading smartdrv will have the same effect as when it is not loaded.
|

http://dato.ys168.com
google search bot
http://dato.minidns.net/ |
|
2006-2-13 16:10 |
|
|
aoon
初级用户
 
积分 122
发帖 47
注册 2006-1-3
状态 离线
|
『第 5 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
就是一定要 config.sys 和himem.sys
并且在Config.sys里加一行 device=himem.sys
才能运行
That is, it must be config.sys and himem.sys, and add a line "device=himem.sys" in Config.sys to be able to run.
|
|
2006-2-15 13:36 |
|
|
gxblgb
初级用户
 
积分 75
发帖 36
注册 2006-2-8
状态 离线
|
『第 6 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
我装了十多次系统都没有运行smartdrv.exe,也不算慢
I installed the system more than ten times and didn't run smartdrv.exe, and it's not slow either
|
|
2006-2-15 14:29 |
|
|
Scott0902
中级用户
  
积分 466
发帖 237
注册 2005-10-12
状态 离线
|
『第 7 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
Originally posted by gxblgb at 2006-2-15 14:29:
我装了十多次系统都没有运行smartdrv.exe,也不算慢
现在的硬盘比以前快很多嘛,所以运不运行都差不多。
Originally posted by gxblgb at 2006-2-15 14:29:
I have installed the system more than ten times without running smartdrv.exe, and it is not slow.
Now the hard disk is much faster than before, so it's almost the same whether you run it or not.
|
|
2006-2-15 16:51 |
|
|
本是
银牌会员
    
积分 2221
发帖 789
注册 2005-1-27
状态 离线
|
『第 8 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
除非用GHOST等的镜像方式或其他直接操作磁盘硬件的DMA等方式,先运行SMARTDRV再安装,和不运行SMARTDRV就开始安装,在拷贝阶段的时间消耗上的差别贼大!有我亲身经历(安装系统/DELTREE 庞大目录系统)为证!
Last edited by 本是 on 2006-2-15 at 20:31 ]
The difference in time consumption during the copying phase is extremely large between installing with running SMARTDRV first and installing without running SMARTDRV first, unless using mirroring methods like GHOST or other direct disk hardware DMA methods! There is evidence from my personal experience (installing the system/DELTREE large directory system)!
Last edited by 本是 on 2006-2-15 at 20:31 ]
|

my major is english----my love is dos----my teacher is the buddha----my friends--how about U |
|
2006-2-15 20:30 |
|
|
aoon
初级用户
 
积分 122
发帖 47
注册 2006-1-3
状态 离线
|
『第 9 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
Originally posted by gxblgb at 2006-2-15 14:29:
我装了十多次系统都没有运行smartdrv.exe,也不算慢
我也装了几次,没用smartdrv.exe。到复制文件时就像停了是的,没有显示进度,没有复制文件提示,等了好久啊。。等不及啊!
Originally posted by gxblgb at 2006-2-15 14:29:
I've installed the system more than ten times without running smartdrv.exe, and it's not slow.
I've also installed it several times, and didn't use smartdrv.exe. When copying files, it seems to stop, no progress is shown, no file copying prompt, and it takes a long time. Can't wait!
|
|
2006-2-16 09:46 |
|
|
wl00560
银牌会员
    
积分 1384
发帖 709
注册 2005-10-29
状态 离线
|
『第 10 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
安装winxp时如果不加载smartdrv,呵呵,有可能要花三倍时间!加载之后,很快就可以装完。
楼主的问题也许是把smartdrv这个文件删除了,如果可以,拷贝一个来,如果不行,就不加载吧,也只是时间多一点而已。
When installing Windows XP, if you don't load smartdrv, heh heh, it might take three times as long! After loading, it can be installed quickly.
The landlord's problem might be that the smartdrv file has been deleted. If possible, copy one over. If not, just don't load it. It's just that it will take a bit more time.
|
|
2006-2-17 01:13 |
|