|
GOTOmsdos
铂金会员
       C++启程者
积分 5154
发帖 1827
注册 2003-7-18
状态 离线
|
『楼 主』:
对 GHOST 用户参数的 借鉴和思考...
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
自己在写硬盘读写器的过程中,借鉴了GHOST的表示硬盘和分区的参数,很简洁
比如 : 1:2...
但是,同时觉得GHOST 的 其他参数 比如 SRC,DST,CLONE,PDUMP,PRESTORE,SPLIT等等,是不是有点背离这种精神了 ..
看到一些编程书(有关用户界面)介绍设计程序应该不要让用户涉及到程序内部的东西,诸如读取数据(READ模式),写模式(WRITE),什么类型,源数据(SRC),目标数据(TARGET),倾倒(DUMP),恢复(RESTORE)等等,因为这些是程序员的事,程序员写程序往往不由自主的把这些东西带出来,这就不是充分为用户考虑,应该动脑筋设计出不带程序痕迹而易用(user friendly)...
当然,也得有个简单的约定(比如,1,2,代表硬盘,1:2 代表硬盘的分区....)
刚刚设想自己刚写的迷你硬盘读写器的参数采用什么方式?
为作到既简洁又有丰富的功能(当然是就我程序中含有的功能..)
初步设计如下参数模式,供参考..
除了TO之外,不见一个程序员的术语...
1
程序 1 TO 2
自然就是把硬盘1复制到硬盘2,无须源硬盘和目标硬盘,自然是采用左是源,右是目标,符合一般人的思维习惯.甚至连 TO 不要也是可以的...当然有了,思维更清晰
4(多硬盘)
程序 1,2 TO 3
5(加入分区功能)
程序 1:2 TO 2:3
把硬盘1的分区2复制到硬盘2的分区3
6(支持盘符)
程序 E: TO 2:3
7
程序 C: TO G:
支持镜象文件
8
程序 1 TO (1)
把硬盘1装入镜象文件1
9
程序 1 TO (1=C)
把硬盘1装入镜象文件1,压缩,默认级别
10
程序 1 TO (1=C9)
把硬盘1装入镜象文件1,压缩,级别9
11
程序 1 TO (1=C9=K)
把硬盘1装入镜象文件1,压缩,级别9,加密
12
程序 1 TO (1=C9=K=V)
把硬盘1装入镜象文件1,压缩,级别9,加密,默认分卷(1000MB)
12
程序 1 TO (1=C9=K=V1500)
把硬盘1装入镜象文件1,压缩,级别9,加密,分卷(1500MB)
12
程序 1 TO (1=C9=K=V1500=E)
把硬盘1装入镜象文件1,压缩,级别9,加密,分卷(1500MB),每个分卷都要加密(与第一个文件一样的密码)
12
程序 1 TO (1=C9=K=V1500=E?)
把硬盘1装入镜象文件1,压缩,级别9,加密,分卷(1500MB),每个分卷都要加密(每个文件都要提示用户输入不同密码)
13(根据镜象文件恢复)
程序 (1) TO 1
把镜象文件1恢复到硬盘1,自动检查是否是压缩,但不自动检查有无分卷
14(根据镜象文件恢复)
程序 (1=V) TO 1
把镜象文件1恢复到硬盘1,自动检查是否是压缩,
自动检查分卷,如无,则提示用户输入分卷名(如果用户后来改名了)
如果需要丰富功能的:
综合:
程序 1:2,2:3,3:4 TO 3:2,(G:\BACK.Z=C9=K=V1500=E?)
如果需要指定扇区位置,并指定操作扇区数的 :
(- 表示要操作的开始扇区位置
+ 表示要操作的总扇区数)
1
程序 1-100+1000 TO 2
从第100扇区开始把硬盘1的1000扇区 复制到硬盘的0扇区
2
程序 1-100+1000 TO 2-200
3
程序 1:2-100+1000 TO 2:3-300
4
程序 1:2+1000,E:-300 TO G:-200,2:4-500
5
程序 1:2+1000,E:-300 TO G:-200,(H:\BACK.Z=C9=K=V500=E?)+1000,2:4-500
把硬盘1的分区2, 1000扇区 和E:盘的第300扇区,全部 装入到G:盘的200扇区处(全部剩下扇区)和文件H:\BACK.Z (1000扇区,指未压缩)和硬盘2的分区4的500扇区处.
...
我的迷你硬盘读写器将尝试采用这个参数模式....
Last edited by GOTOmsdos on 2006-8-19 at 21:46 ]
In the process of writing a hard disk reader-writer, I referred to the parameters for representing hard disks and partitions in GHOST, which are very concise, such as: 1:2...
However, at the same time, I feel that other parameters in GHOST, such as SRC, DST, CLONE, PDUMP, PRESTORE, SPLIT, etc., are a bit deviating from this spirit..
I saw some programming books (about user interface) introducing that when designing a program, users should not be involved in the internal things of the program, such as read mode (READ), write mode (WRITE), what type, source data (SRC), target data (TARGET), dump (DUMP), restore (RESTORE), etc., because these are the business of programmers. Programmers often involuntarily bring out these things when writing programs, which is not fully considering users. One should use one's brain to design something that is free of program traces and easy to use (user friendly)...
Of course, there should also be a simple convention (for example, 1, 2 represent hard disks, 1:2 represents a partition of a hard disk....)
Just now, I was thinking about what parameter mode to adopt for the mini hard disk reader-writer I just wrote?
To achieve both conciseness and rich functions (of course, just for the functions contained in my program..)
The initial design of the following parameter mode is for reference..
Except for TO, there is no programmer's term seen...
1
Program 1 TO 2
Naturally, it is to copy hard disk 1 to hard disk 2. There is no need for source hard disk and target hard disk. Naturally, the left is the source and the right is the target, which conforms to the thinking habit of most people. Even without TO, it is also possible... Of course, with TO, the thinking is clearer
4 (multiple hard disks)
Program 1, 2 TO 3
5 (adding partition function)
Program 1:2 TO 2:3
Copy partition 2 of hard disk 1 to partition 3 of hard disk 2
6 (support drive letters)
Program E: TO 2:3
7
Program C: TO G:
Support image files
8
Program 1 TO (1)
Load hard disk 1 into image file 1
9
Program 1 TO (1=C)
Load hard disk 1 into image file 1, compress, default level
10
Program 1 TO (1=C9)
Load hard disk 1 into image file 1, compress, level 9
11
Program 1 TO (1=C9=K)
Load hard disk 1 into image file 1, compress, level 9, encrypt
12
Program 1 TO (1=C9=K=V)
Load hard disk 1 into image file 1, compress, level 9, encrypt, default volume (1000MB)
12
Program 1 TO (1=C9=K=V1500)
Load hard disk 1 into image file 1, compress, level 9, encrypt, volume (1500MB)
12
Program 1 TO (1=C9=K=V1500=E)
Load hard disk 1 into image file 1, compress, level 9, encrypt, volume (1500MB), each volume should be encrypted (with the same password as the first file)
12
Program 1 TO (1=C9=K=V1500=E?)
Load hard disk 1 into image file 1, compress, level 9, encrypt, volume (1500MB), each volume should be encrypted (each file should prompt the user to enter a different password)
13 (restore according to image file)
Program (1) TO 1
Restore image file 1 to hard disk 1, automatically check whether it is compressed, but do not automatically check whether there are volumes
14 (restore according to image file)
Program (1=V) TO 1
Restore image file 1 to hard disk 1, automatically check whether it is compressed,
Automatically check volumes. If not, prompt the user to enter the volume name (if the user renamed it later)
If you need to enrich functions:
Comprehensive:
Program 1:2, 2:3, 3:4 TO 3:2, (G:\BACK.Z=C9=K=V1500=E?)
If you need to specify the sector position and specify the number of sectors to operate:
(- means the starting sector position to operate
+ means the total number of sectors to operate)
1
Program 1-100+1000 TO 2
Copy 1000 sectors from sector 100 of hard disk 1 to sector 0 of the hard disk
2
Program 1-100+1000 TO 2-200
3
Program 1:2-100+1000 TO 2:3-300
4
Program 1:2+1000, E:-300 TO G:-200, 2:4-500
5
Program 1:2+1000, E:-300 TO G:-200, (H:\BACK.Z=C9=K=V500=E?)+1000, 2:4-500
Load 1000 sectors of partition 2 of hard disk 1 and 300th sector of E: drive into sector 200 of G: drive (all remaining sectors) and file H:\BACK.Z (1000 sectors, referring to uncompressed) and 500th sector of partition 4 of hard disk 2....
My mini hard disk reader-writer will try to adopt this parameter mode....
Last edited by GOTOmsdos on 2006-8-19 at 21:46 ]
|
|
2006-8-19 21:43 |
|
|
wang6610
银牌会员
    
积分 1246
发帖 488
注册 2003-11-11
状态 离线
|
『第 2 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
思路很好,越简单越需要考虑严谨周密。
避免矛盾和重复。
Last edited by wang6610 on 2006-8-19 at 22:41 ]
The idea is very good. The simpler it is, the more rigorous and thorough it needs to be.
Avoid contradictions and repetitions.
Last edited by wang6610 on 2006-8-19 at 22:41 ]
|
|
2006-8-19 22:39 |
|
|
fastslz
铂金会员
       DOS一根葱
积分 5493
发帖 2315
注册 2006-5-1 来自 上海
状态 离线
|
『第 3 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
1:支持盘符!DOS下的盘符?还是win下的?是否考虑放弃以盘符方式备份,毕竟vista的诞生还会出现新的格式,有个ntfs盘符交错已经够乱了,不如刚开始设计时就不考虑盘符支持。
2:如上参数都是数字是否会出现误操作?是否考虑备份恢复操作加入核心参数?如备份用/B 恢复用/R 扇区操作/F(字母可选)这样也可以避免一些误操作。另外1 TO (1=C9=K=V1500=E) 的=符号是否考虑改用已习惯的 - 符号。
1: Support drive letters! Drive letters under DOS? Or under Windows? Is there a consideration to give up backing up in the form of drive letters? After all, the birth of Vista will bring new formats. Having NTFS drive letter interleaving is already messy enough. It's better not to consider drive letter support when designing initially.
2: Will there be misoperations if the above parameters are all numbers? Is there a consideration to add core parameters to backup and restore operations? For example, use /B for backup, /R for restore, and /F for sector operations (letters can be optional). This can also avoid some misoperations. In addition, for 1 TO (1=C9=K=V1500=E), is there a consideration to use the - symbol instead of the = symbol which has been accustomed to.
|
|
2006-8-19 22:48 |
|
|
GOTOmsdos
铂金会员
       C++启程者
积分 5154
发帖 1827
注册 2003-7-18
状态 离线
|
『第 4 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
我原来的参数是
程序
1
-r|w -d1 -d2
-r|w -d1 -s100 -d2
-r|w -d1 -s100 -n1000 -d2
-r|w -d1 -s100 -n1000 -d2 -s200
2
-r|w -d1 -p1 -d2 -p2
-r|w -d1 -p1 -s100 -d2 -p2
-r|w -d1 -p1 -s100 -n1000 -d2 -p2 -s300
3
-r|w -d1 -ffile
-r|w -d1 -p1 -ffile.z -c9 -k -v1000 -e?
....
现在,感觉很烦.
My original parameters are
Program
1
-r|w -d1 -d2
-r|w -d1 -s100 -d2
-r|w -d1 -s100 -n1000 -d2
-r|w -d1 -s100 -n1000 -d2 -s200
2
-r|w -d1 -p1 -d2 -p2
-r|w -d1 -p1 -s100 -d2 -p2
-r|w -d1 -p1 -s100 -n1000 -d2 -p2 -s300
3
-r|w -d1 -ffile
-r|w -d1 -p1 -ffile.z -c9 -k -v1000 -e?
....Now, I feel very annoyed.
|
|
2006-8-19 22:49 |
|
|
fastslz
铂金会员
       DOS一根葱
积分 5493
发帖 2315
注册 2006-5-1 来自 上海
状态 离线
|
『第 5 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
再来一个有点异想天开的想法
程序 1:2,2:3,3:4 TO 3:2,(?:\BACK.Z=C9=K=V1500=E?)
?:\BACK.Z 这个?类似find的功能 
Come up with another slightly far-fetched idea
Program 1:2,2:3,3:4 TO 3:2,(?:\BACK.Z=C9=K=V1500=E?)
?:\BACK.Z This? Similar to the find function :lol: :cool:
|
|
2006-8-19 22:58 |
|
|
GOTOmsdos
铂金会员
       C++启程者
积分 5154
发帖 1827
注册 2003-7-18
状态 离线
|
『第 6 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
TO fastslz
1
因为是DOS程序,盘符自然是DOS盘符(FAT12,FAT16,FAT32),如果要处理非FAT分区,程序有选项,可显示各种形式的分区表项,供用户操作前查看的....支持全部分区
2
关于误操作的问题,这个不用担心的,硬盘工具都是慎重又慎重的,不会一次定乾坤的
程序会告诉用户一些用户输入的参数信息,等用户确认的,如果是写盘,还多一次写确认.
我的设想中的 TO 这个唯一的关键字我觉得已经足够了,他清楚的表明了源和目标的关系.程序需要的种种参数已完全在左右的输入中了.
你提出的,如备份用/B 恢复用/R 扇区操作/F, 这些,,固然有他的用处,但是,与我的本帖的初衷(简洁,高效)就相悖了, 而且 在技术上,"备份" "恢复"的关系已经在TO中得到了说明,如果是 左--磁盘 右--文件 ,这自然是叫"备份"; 反过来, 自然就是叫"恢复".用户心中应该是很清楚的. 如果,硬要说出这些概念,有些不懂电脑的用户到反而会不太清楚这些概念了..
在GHOST用户界面 中的
DISK TO DISK,
DISK TO IMAGE
IMAGE TO DISK
PARTITION TO PARTITION
PARTITION TO IMAGE
IMAGE TO PARTITION
也就是这个道理吧?
(他没有说,在此处 备份,在此处恢复...)
这也可能是思维习惯的问题..
3
至于 = 符号,我原先也考虑都用 - 号,但是 用户要输入含有 - 号 的文件名怎么办?
我也考虑过用 / * 等,最后还是觉得 = 好,它也不要同时按下 SHIFT,直接可以打出来,也醒目....
TO fastslz
1
Since it's a DOS program, the drive letters are naturally DOS drive letters (FAT12, FAT16, FAT32). If you need to handle non-FAT partitions, the program has options to display various forms of partition table entries for users to view before operation.... It supports all partitions.
2
Regarding the issue of misoperation, there's no need to worry. Hard disk tools are very cautious. They won't make a final decision at once. The program will inform the user of some parameter information entered by the user, and wait for the user to confirm. If it's writing to the disk, there's an additional write confirmation.
I think the unique keyword TO in my concept is sufficient. It clearly indicates the relationship between the source and the target. All the parameters the program needs are completely in the left and right inputs.
The ones you mentioned, such as backup with /B, restore with /R, sector operation with /F, etc., although they have their uses, they go against the original intention of this thread (conciseness and efficiency). Moreover, technically, the relationship between "backup" and "restore" is already explained in TO. If it's left--disk and right--file, it's naturally called "backup"; conversely, it's naturally called "restore". Users should be very clear in their minds. If we have to mention these concepts, some users who don't understand computers may not be clear about these concepts instead.
In the GHOST user interface:
DISK TO DISK,
DISK TO IMAGE
IMAGE TO DISK
PARTITION TO PARTITION
PARTITION TO IMAGE
IMAGE TO PARTITION
That's the same principle.
(It doesn't say, "backup here, restore here...")
This may also be a matter of thinking habits.
3
As for the = symbol, I originally also considered using the - sign, but what if the user needs to enter a file name containing a - sign?
I also considered using /, *, etc., and finally still think = is good. It doesn't need to press SHIFT at the same time, can be typed directly, and is also eye-catching....
|
|
2006-8-19 23:16 |
|
|
GOTOmsdos
铂金会员
       C++启程者
积分 5154
发帖 1827
注册 2003-7-18
状态 离线
|
『第 7 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
(?:\BACK.Z=C9=K=V1500=E?)
可以啊!
不过,要有一定的用处啊!
你要它表示什么功能用处呢?
嘿嘿
C语言中 著名的唯一的三木运算式 就是这样的:
XXX ? A : B
意思是: XXX 是真的吗? 如果是真的 就 A 否则就 B
哇! 多简洁! 既简洁清楚又有美感..
Last edited by GOTOmsdos on 2006-8-19 at 23:40 ]
(?:\BACK.Z=C9=K=V1500=E?)
Okay!
But it needs to have a certain use!
What function do you want it to represent?
Hehe
The famous unique ternary operation expression in C language is like this:
XXX ? A : B
Meaning: Is XXX true? If it is true, then A, otherwise B
Wow! So concise! Both concise, clear and aesthetic..
Last edited by GOTOmsdos on 2006-8-19 at 23:40 ]
|
|
2006-8-19 23:17 |
|
|
GOTOmsdos
铂金会员
       C++启程者
积分 5154
发帖 1827
注册 2003-7-18
状态 离线
|
『第 8 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
那些老的优秀的 DOS LINUX 程序员 都有很多既有个性又简洁丰富功能的参数符号呢!
Last edited by GOTOmsdos on 2006-8-19 at 23:34 ]
Those old and excellent DOS LINUX programmers all have many parameter symbols that are both personalized and concise with rich functions!
Last edited by GOTOmsdos on 2006-8-19 at 23:34 ]
|
|
2006-8-19 23:20 |
|
|
fastslz
铂金会员
       DOS一根葱
积分 5493
发帖 2315
注册 2006-5-1 来自 上海
状态 离线
|
『第 9 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
?:\BACK.Z
这么说吧,我是希望它自动去查找,如同命令
FOR %%A IN (1:2 1:3 1:4 1:5 1:6 1:7 1:8 1:9 1:10 2:1 2:2 2:3 2:4 2:5 2:6 2:7 2:8 2:9 2:10 3:1 3:2 3:3 3:4 3:5 3:6 3:7 3:8 3:9 3:10 4:1 4:2 4:3 4:4 4:5 4:6 4:7 4:8 4:9 4:10) DO %%A:\BACK.Z TO 1:1
即同时执行1:2至4:10而不会因为执行
1:2:\BACK.Z TO 1:1
找不到1:2:\BACK.Z后因为错误跳出而继续执行
1:3:\BACK.Z TO 1:1
直到执行完任何一个可能出现的数字,类似grub参数find --set-root /menu.lst上面(1:2 1:3 1:4 1:5 1:6 1:7 1:8 1:9 1:10 2:1 2:2 2:3 2:4 2:5 2:6 2:7 2:8 2:9 2:10 3:1 3:2 3:3 3:4 3:5 3:6 3:7 3:8 3:9 3:10 4:1 4:2 4:3 4:4 4:5 4:6 4:7 4:8 4:9 4:10)等于4个硬盘每个暂定可能会出现10个分区
Last edited by fastslz on 2006-8-20 at 00:38 ]
Well, let's put it this way, I hope it can automatically search, just like the command
FOR %%A IN (1:2 1:3 1:4 1:5 1:6 1:7 1:8 1:9 1:10 2:1 2:2 2:3 2:4 2:5 2:6 2:7 2:8 2:9 2:10 3:1 3:2 3:3 3:4 3:5 3:6 3:7 3:8 3:9 3:10 4:1 4:2 4:3 4:4 4:5 4:6 4:7 4:8 4:9 4:10) DO %%A:\BACK.Z TO 1:1
That is, execute 1:2 to 4:10 at the same time without jumping out due to an error because 1:2:\BACK.Z is not found and then continue to execute 1:3:\BACK.Z TO 1:1 until any possible number is executed. It's similar to the grub parameter find --set-root /menu.lstThe above (1:2 1:3 1:4 1:5 1:6 1:7 1:8 1:9 1:10 2:1 2:2 2:3 2:4 2:5 2:6 2:7 2:8 2:9 2:10 3:1 3:2 3:3 3:4 3:5 3:6 3:7 3:8 3:9 3:10 4:1 4:2 4:3 4:4 4:5 4:6 4:7 4:8 4:9 4:10) is equal to 4 hard drives and tentatively may have 10 partitions each
Last edited by fastslz on 2006-8-20 at 00:38 ]
|
|
2006-8-20 00:24 |
|
|
GOTOmsdos
铂金会员
       C++启程者
积分 5154
发帖 1827
注册 2003-7-18
状态 离线
|
『第 10 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
哦,这个意思..
你的意思是 当(?:\BACK.Z=C9=K=V1500=E?) 在左边时吧?
就是源文件.
因为是DOS程序, 所以,寻找FAT格式的分区还是可以考虑的,其他的自然就做不到了啊
不过,思路挺有意思
Oh, this means...
You mean when (?:\BACK.Z=C9=K=V1500=E?) is on the left?
That is the source file.
Because it's a DOS program, so looking for FAT - formatted partitions is still worth considering, and others naturally can't be done.
But the idea is quite interesting
|
|
2006-8-20 00:59 |
|
|
fastslz
铂金会员
       DOS一根葱
积分 5493
发帖 2315
注册 2006-5-1 来自 上海
状态 离线
|
『第 11 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
这样就完美了,根本就不用考验盘符问题了
关于参数符号我觉的文件名中 , 出现几率少于 - 也算是习惯之内,
而=我在这里随便说说啊!在ghost参数中我习惯自定义压缩级别变量
set 压缩级别=-z2
而在你的在参数里就变成错误语法了
set 压缩级别==c9
虽然可以用set 压缩级别=c9但这也是我发现=符号不适合的一个原因,仅做参考
This is perfect, and there's no need to test the drive letter issue at all.
Regarding the parameter symbols, I think the occurrence of commas in filenames is less than that of hyphens, which is also within the scope of habits.
And the equal sign, I'm just talking casually here! In the Ghost parameters, I'm used to customizing the compression level variable.
set 压缩级别=-z2
But in your parameters, it becomes incorrect syntax.
set 压缩级别==c9
Although you can use set 压缩级别=c9, this is also one of the reasons I found that the equal sign is not suitable. Just for reference.
|
|
2006-8-20 01:02 |
|
|
fastslz
铂金会员
       DOS一根葱
积分 5493
发帖 2315
注册 2006-5-1 来自 上海
状态 离线
|
『第 12 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
其实恢复系统比备份系统更容易错,这点我想大家在日常ghost中经常遇到找不到某个.gho恢复系统失败。我也受grub的find启发,
grub命令行下find --set-root /system.gho试试
grub确实做到了只可惜不能打印内容到文件
Actually, restoring the system is easier to go wrong than backing up the system. I think everyone often encounters the situation of failing to restore the system because they can't find a certain.gho during daily ghost operations. I was also inspired by grub's find. Try the grub command line: find --set-root /system.gho. Grub indeed did it, but unfortunately, it can't print the content to a file.
|
|
2006-8-20 01:26 |
|
|
GOTOmsdos
铂金会员
       C++启程者
积分 5154
发帖 1827
注册 2003-7-18
状态 离线
|
『第 13 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
1 - =
当然,这个符号是无所谓的,如果有更好的可以考虑换一换
但是,键盘上就是那么多可用的符号,其他的都觉得不合适
你建议的仍用 - ,可是,我还是觉得文件名还是经常用它的,
在LINUX中,全部都是用 - 的,在WIN/DOS中,也很常见的
一般都是 XXX-A-1, YYY-2.等等,用来区别的
还有, _ 也是 合法的文件名,有人也很喜欢用的,尤其是程序员出身的,
用它分割起来使文件名比 - 更清楚
至于你说的 = 与== 混淆, 这个其实,关系不大,因为毕竟程序中的 符号 用的是不多的
就那么几次...不至于引起很大的混淆..(而且都限定在括号中)
2 Z C
这个是可以考虑通用习惯的.
1 - =
Of course, this symbol is irrelevant. If there is a better one, we can consider changing it.
But, there are only so many available symbols on the keyboard, and the others don't feel appropriate.
You suggested still using -, but I still think that filenames often use it.
In LINUX, it's all using -, and in WIN/DOS, it's also very common.
Generally, it's like XXX-A-1, YYY-2, etc., used for distinction.
Also, _ is also a legal filename, and some people like to use it very much, especially those with a programmer background.
Using it to separate makes the filename clearer than -.
As for the confusion between = and == you mentioned, this actually doesn't matter much because after all, the use of symbols in the program is not much.
Just a few times... It won't cause great confusion..(and it's all limited in parentheses)
2 Z C
This can be considered a common habit.
|
|
2006-8-20 01:49 |
|
|
johnsonlam
银牌会员
     阿林
积分 1410
发帖 497
注册 2004-6-28 来自 九龍,香港
状态 离线
|
『第 14 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
Originally posted by GOTOmsdos at 2006-8-19 10:49 PM:
1
-r|w -d1 -d2
-r|w -d1 -s100 -d2
-r|w -d1 -s100 -n1000 -d2
-r|w -d1 -s100 -n1000 -d2 -s200
2
-r|w -d1 -p1 -d2 -p2
-r|w -d1 -p1 -s100 -d2 -p2
-r|w -d1 ...
借 镜 LAME 的 作 法 ...
--preset 1
--preset 2
Originally posted by GOTOmsdos at 2006-8-19 10:49 PM:
1
-r|w -d1 -d2
-r|w -d1 -s100 -d2
-r|w -d1 -s100 -n1000 -d2
-r|w -d1 -s100 -n1000 -d2 -s200
2
-r|w -d1 -p1 -d2 -p2
-r|w -d1 -p1 -s100 -d2 -p2
-r|w -d1 ...
Drawing on the approach of LAME...
--preset 1
--preset 2
|

我 的 網 站 - http://optimizr.dyndns.org
|
|
2006-9-1 14:00 |
|
|