中国DOS联盟

I thought that since this site uses "DOS Union" as the station name, it should reflect its characteristics!

It should be mainly focused on "Operating System Applications" and "Software Applications/Tips".

Batch scripts based on Windows.
The old DOS is not very useful.

I'm a super newbie, just starting to learn. But the LZ brought up this topic, I use my thumb to praise! Upvote

The kernel of DOS, I don't know much about it, and I want to learn!

I discovered that the kernel of DOS is related to machine code!

Want to know about the problem of dual-booting Windows and Linux.

Originally posted by whmbs at 2003-10-30 00:0日
I don't think it's necessary to develop a graphical interface compatible with Windows. If you want one, Windows 9x is already available. Why develop another one?

Support

I think it should develop in the direction of specifically analyzing and solving system failures and learning practical maintenance operations of computer systems

Because I am a beginner. I hope to study systematically and from simple to complex!!

On the one hand, it is the research on the kernel of the OS; on the other hand, it is the application of new - type DOS, such as cmd, cmdcons, WinPE, BluCons, etc.

Why does Windows have the majority of users in the world? That's because it has the above three characteristics. If these three characteristics can be achieved, then DOS can also be like Windows. Moreover, DOS is free + secure + (beautification, which I added. Think about it, the computer is your tool, and you can make it a personalized computer). Then DOS must be better than Windows. FIRST, does one have to learn DOS very thoroughly to use it? 2. Do we need to distinguish DOS and Windows so clearly? (It seems that Windows was not built on the basis of DOS before? Now we still use DOS to partition and format, and then install Windows?) ~~~ 3. When learning DOS, Windows, Unix/Linux and other operating systems, aren't they all compiled with languages? Since it's a language, there is universality. 4. I think learning DOS is difficult, then DOS can only develop in the laboratory. (A good thing can only be accepted if it is easy to use.) 5. DOS must be like culture. (Personal opinion) Culture has acceptance and rejection. Good things are accepted, bad things are rejected. 6. For beginners, simple and convenient use of DOS is the real truth. (Designing a software to learn DOS under Windows, it seems that virtualization can be used. I don't know if it's possible.) 7. Those who use DOS at an advanced level can apply under DOS. (Also hope that there are DOS software supports.) 8. Regarding the DOS system, there are a few points I want to know why? (A) Why isn't Windows using a SHELL, AGL shell? (It seems so, just heard it.) (B) Hope that DOS can be a hierarchical system. This is what I want for the DOS system. I don't know if there is any mistake. If there is a mistake, there is no way. Think about it, how many people made Windows?

In fact, a lot of computer technology can be found online. Although some are of mixed quality, our website is "China DOS Union". We should start with DOS. First, popularize knowledge about DOS, then explore the in-depth aspects of DOS, and then take into account various operating systems as well as software and hardware aspects.

There is a bad place, that is, no line breaks, I hope to change it

Wrong, can line break, I thought the title was the content

Last edited by wl00560 on 2007-1-12 at 08:49 AM ]

I think it should be easy to understand, making it easier for people to accept DOS. Thanks!