|
Climbing
铂金会员
       网络独行侠
积分 6962
发帖 2753
注册 2003-4-16 来自 河北保定
状态 离线
|
『楼 主』:
[讨论]MS-DOS 7.1在大硬盘后面的分区上不能启动?
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
昨天给人装机时遇到一个十分奇怪的问题,特拿出来与大家共享。
这台机器的硬件详细配置我就不用细讲了,也就是普通的兼容机,硬盘是60G的Seagate硬盘,我用PM分了三个主分区一个扩展分区,三个主分区每个均为4G,我原来打算在第一个分区上安装xp,第二个分区保留用来安装另一个操作系统,第三个分区安装dos 7.1 + Ghost用来保存系统的克隆文件。就在第三个分区问题来了,第一主分区上的xp运行很正常,但第三个分区上的dos 7.1无论如何都不能启动,后来我将dos 7.1安装到第二主分区,故障依旧,直到我将它安装到第一主分区,它才开始工作正常。后来我将98的dos安装到第三主分区,98的dos却能够正常启动。难道有问题?我原来以为98的dos和dos 7.1应该是一样的,没想到却真的不一样。
大家有什么意见?
Yesterday, when I was installing a computer for someone, I encountered a very strange problem, so I specially took it out to share with you all.
I don't need to go into detail about the detailed hardware configuration of this machine. It's just an ordinary compatible machine. The hard disk is a 60G Seagate hard disk. I used PM to divide three primary partitions and one extended partition. Each of the three primary partitions is 4G. I originally planned to install XP on the first partition, keep the second partition to install another operating system, and install DOS 7.1 + Ghost on the third partition to save system clone files. Then the problem came with the third partition. The XP on the first primary partition ran very normally, but the DOS 7.1 on the third partition couldn't start no matter what. Later, I installed DOS 7.1 on the second primary partition, and the fault was still the same. Until I installed it on the first primary partition, it started to work normally. Then I installed the DOS of 98 on the third primary partition, and the DOS of 98 could start normally. Is there a problem? I originally thought that the DOS of 98 and DOS 7.1 should be the same, but I didn't expect that they were really different.
What are everyone's opinions?
|

偶只喜欢回答那些标题和描述都很清晰的帖子!
如想解决问题,请认真学习“这个帖子”和“这个帖子”并努力遵守,如果可能,请告诉更多的人!
|
|
2004-7-19 00:00 |
|
|
Climbing
铂金会员
       网络独行侠
积分 6962
发帖 2753
注册 2003-4-16 来自 河北保定
状态 离线
|
『第 2 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
补充一句,三个主分区是从硬盘最前面开始分的,顺序分下去,每个4G。
Add a note: The three primary partitions are divided starting from the front of the hard drive, in sequence, each 4G.
|

偶只喜欢回答那些标题和描述都很清晰的帖子!
如想解决问题,请认真学习“这个帖子”和“这个帖子”并努力遵守,如果可能,请告诉更多的人!
|
|
2004-7-19 00:00 |
|
|
Wengier
系统支持
             “新DOS时代”站长
积分 27736
发帖 10521
注册 2002-10-9
状态 离线
|
『第 3 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
DOS各是怎样安装的?比如是SYS还是SETUP?
How are various versions of DOS installed? For example, is it SYS or SETUP?
|

Wengier - 新DOS时代
欢迎大家来到我的“新DOS时代”网站,里面有各类DOS软件和资料,地址:
http://wendos.mycool.net/
E-Mail & MSN: wengierwu AT hotmail.com (最近比较忙,有事请联系DOSroot和雨露,谢谢!)
 |
|
2004-7-19 00:00 |
|
|
Climbing
铂金会员
       网络独行侠
积分 6962
发帖 2753
注册 2003-4-16 来自 河北保定
状态 离线
|
『第 4 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
我没有用dos 7.10的setup安装,最开始我用恢复gho的方式安装(因为我专门制做了一个dos 7.1 + Ghost的小克隆文件),后来也尝试过用sys及format /s的方式,都不成。而98的dos我就是直接sys的。
I didn't install using the setup of DOS 7.10. Initially, I used the method of restoring GHO to install (because I specifically made a small clone file of DOS 7.1 + Ghost). Later, I also tried the methods of sys and format /s, but none worked. And for the DOS of 98, I just used sys directly.
|

偶只喜欢回答那些标题和描述都很清晰的帖子!
如想解决问题,请认真学习“这个帖子”和“这个帖子”并努力遵守,如果可能,请告诉更多的人!
|
|
2004-7-19 00:00 |
|
|
Wengier
系统支持
             “新DOS时代”站长
积分 27736
发帖 10521
注册 2002-10-9
状态 离线
|
『第 5 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
不像setup,sys的方法是在某些情况下会失败。
当时是怎样制作这个DOS的Ghost的Clone文件的呢?是用setup装在硬盘上然后去Clone的?
Unlike setup, the sys method may fail in some cases. How was this DOS Ghost clone file made back then? Was it installed on the hard disk using setup and then cloned?
|

Wengier - 新DOS时代
欢迎大家来到我的“新DOS时代”网站,里面有各类DOS软件和资料,地址:
http://wendos.mycool.net/
E-Mail & MSN: wengierwu AT hotmail.com (最近比较忙,有事请联系DOSroot和雨露,谢谢!)
 |
|
2004-7-19 00:00 |
|
|
Climbing
铂金会员
       网络独行侠
积分 6962
发帖 2753
注册 2003-4-16 来自 河北保定
状态 离线
|
『第 6 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
是的,是用setup安装然后克隆的。
sys 和 setup有何区别?
我觉得这个问题跟具体的机器的硬件可能也有关系,因为,在我的另一台机器上,DOS 7.1也运行在同样的分区结构上,却没有这个问题。
Yes, it's installed with setup and then cloned.
What's the difference between sys and setup?
I think this problem may also be related to the hardware of the specific machine, because on my other machine, DOS 7.1 also runs on the same partition structure, but there is no this problem.
|

偶只喜欢回答那些标题和描述都很清晰的帖子!
如想解决问题,请认真学习“这个帖子”和“这个帖子”并努力遵守,如果可能,请告诉更多的人!
|
|
2004-7-19 00:00 |
|