|
QinXin
新手上路
积分 4
发帖 2
注册 2007-8-16
状态 离线
|
『第 301 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
测试发现对硬盘分区号识别能力比minito强，minito只能对付标准的分区表。
The test found that it has a stronger ability to identify hard disk partition numbers than minito. Minito can only handle standard partition tables.
|
|
 2007-8-19 12:33 |
|
|
lianjiang2004
金牌会员
积分 3946
发帖 1884
注册 2006-1-20
状态 离线
|
|
|
2007-8-19 12:42 |
|
|
zhangxue
初级用户
积分 183
发帖 82
注册 2006-3-28
状态 离线
|
『第 303 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
BUG报告！
非标准的分区表，硬盘号出现错误。
附件里面有Acronis Disk Director和Gdisk以及dspt的信息截图，其中Acronis和Gdisk是正确的。还附带dspt 0 0 1 /s导出的mbr。
BUG report!
Non-standard partition table, hard drive number error.
There are screenshots of Acronis Disk Director, Gdisk, and dspt information in the attachment. Among them, Acronis and Gdisk are correct. Also attached is the mbr exported by dspt 0 0 1 /s.
附件
1:  error.rar (2007-8-19 14:33, 88.36 KiB,下载次数： 27)
|
|
|
2007-8-19 14:33 |
|
|
lianjiang2004
金牌会员
积分 3946
发帖 1884
注册 2006-1-20
状态 离线
|
|
|
2007-8-19 15:36 |
|
|
wang6610
银牌会员
积分 1246
发帖 488
注册 2003-11-11
状态 离线
|
『第 305 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
Originally posted by zhangxue at 2007-8-19 02:33 PM:
BUG报告！
非标准的分区表，硬盘号出现错误。
附件里面有Acronis Disk Director和Gdisk以及dspt的信息截图，其中Acronis和Gdisk是正确的。还附带dspt 0 0 1 /s导出的mbr。
我看这次是gdisk和adds错了，
再运行ghost11.0.1察看一下就知道谁错了。
Last edited by wang6610 on 2007-8-19 at 03:52 PM ]
Originally posted by zhangxue at 2007-8-19 02:33 PM:
BUG report!
Non-standard partition table, hard drive number error.
There are screenshots of Acronis Disk Director, Gdisk, and dspt information in the attachment. Among them, Acronis and Gdisk are correct. Also attached is the mbr exported by dspt 0 0 1 /s.
I think this time it's Gdisk and adds that are wrong,
Run ghost11.0.1 to check and you'll know who's wrong.
Last edited by wang6610 on 2007-8-19 at 03:52 PM ]
|
|
|
2007-8-19 15:49 |
|
|
wang6610
银牌会员
积分 1246
发帖 488
注册 2003-11-11
状态 离线
|
『第 306 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
Originally posted by lianjiang2004 at 2007-8-19 03:36 PM:
楼上的分区不知是如何建起来的？不可思议。
aefdisk或gdisk都可以。
Originally posted by lianjiang2004 at 2007-8-19 03:36 PM:
How was the partition above built? Inconceivable.
Both aefdisk or gdisk can be used.
|
|
|
2007-8-19 15:53 |
|
|
lianjiang2004
金牌会员
积分 3946
发帖 1884
注册 2006-1-20
状态 离线
|
『第 307 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
逻辑分区怎么跑到主分区的两侧的？逻辑分区不是只能在扩展分区之下吗？
最后一个逻辑分区似乎不在扩展分区之下。或者说后一个主分区在扩展分区之下，确实不理解。
真是孤陋寡闻呀。
How does the logical partition end up on both sides of the primary partition? Isn't the logical partition supposed to be only under the extended partition?
The last logical partition doesn't seem to be under the extended partition. Or the next primary partition is under the extended partition. I really don't understand.
I'm really ignorant.
|
Windows 一键还原
http://www.yjhy.com |
|
|
2007-8-19 16:16 |
|
|
zhangxue
初级用户
积分 183
发帖 82
注册 2006-3-28
状态 离线
|
『第 308 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
1，ntfs4dos也可以识别出各分区以及顺序正确
2，当分区全部格式化为fat32时，dos访问无任何障碍，那应该表示没错。
3，就dspt而言，仅仅是顺序上有一点点偏差而已。
4，最重要的，不管是对的还是错的，检测程序也应该真实的显示情况，哪怕它是错的。
1. ntfs4dos can also identify each partition and the order is correct.
2. When all partitions are formatted as fat32, there are no obstacles for DOS to access, which should mean there is no problem.
3. As for dspt, it is just a little bit deviated in order.
4. The most important thing is that no matter it is right or wrong, the detection program should also truly display the situation, even if it is wrong.
|
|
|
2007-8-19 17:01 |
|
|
19951001
高级用户
流落街头
积分 570
发帖 272
注册 2005-10-17
来自 北京
状态 离线
|
『第 309 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
Originally posted by zhangxue at 2007-8-19 14:33:
BUG报告！
非标准的分区表，硬盘号出现错误。
附件里面有Acronis Disk Director和Gdisk以及dspt的信息截图，其中Acronis和Gdisk是正确的。还附带dspt 0 0 1 /s导出的mbr。
感谢你对软件的测试，我会尽快找出问题所在
Originally posted by zhangxue at 2007-8-19 14:33:
BUG report!
Non-standard partition table, hard drive number error.
There are screenshots of Acronis Disk Director, Gdisk, and dspt information in the attachment. Among them, Acronis and Gdisk are correct. Also attached is the mbr exported by dspt 0 0 1 /s.
Thanks for testing the software, I will find out the problem as soon as possible
|
|
|
2007-8-20 22:13 |
|
|
19951001
高级用户
流落街头
积分 570
发帖 272
注册 2005-10-17
来自 北京
状态 离线
|
『第 310 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
TO zhangxue：
请测试一下这个版本，看是否存在问题。
Last edited by 19951001 on 2007-8-21 at 06:46 AM ]
TO zhangxue:
Please test this version to see if there are any issues.
Last edited by 19951001 on 2007-8-21 at 06:46 AM ]
|
|
|
2007-8-20 23:05 |
|
|
zhangxue
初级用户
积分 183
发帖 82
注册 2006-3-28
状态 离线
|
|
|
2007-8-20 23:50 |
|
|
19951001
高级用户
流落街头
积分 570
发帖 272
注册 2005-10-17
来自 北京
状态 离线
|
『第 312 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
你提供的图片上看，整个扩展分区的容量是将近 12 G，而扩展分区之后所有的分区容量之和也刚好是这个值，也就是你的最后一个主分区是在扩展分区内产生的，这个分区表的确很特殊。
From the picture you provided, the capacity of the entire extended partition is nearly 12 GB, and the sum of the capacities of all partitions after the extended partition is exactly this value, which means your last primary partition is generated within the extended partition. This partition table is indeed very special.
附件
1:  Gdisk_DSPT.GIF (2007-8-21 06:53, 18.75 KiB,下载次数： 1)
|
|
|
2007-8-21 06:53 |
|
|
lianjiang2004
金牌会员
积分 3946
发帖 1884
注册 2006-1-20
状态 离线
|
『第 313 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
请教最后一个主分区是如何创建的？厉害。
与一般资料介绍的分区规则似乎不符。
Ask about how the last primary partition was created? Amazing. It seems to be inconsistent with the partition rules introduced in general materials.
|
Windows 一键还原
http://www.yjhy.com |
|
|
2007-8-21 09:06 |
|
|
19951001
高级用户
流落街头
积分 570
发帖 272
注册 2005-10-17
来自 北京
状态 离线
|
『第 314 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
我估计这个分区表是首先创建一个主分区，然后创建一个扩展分区，在扩展分区中创建 3 个逻辑分区，使用工具找出扩展分区中三个逻辑分区在磁盘上的绝对位置，把扩展分区中第二个逻辑分区的位置写入 MBR 中的第三项中，将扩展分区中的第一个逻辑分区指向下一个逻辑分区的指针修改为指向扩展分区中第三个逻辑分区，就可以创建出上述的分区表。
Last edited by 19951001 on 2007-8-21 at 06:17 PM ]
I estimate that this partition table is first to create a primary partition, then create an extended partition, create 3 logical partitions in the extended partition, use tools to find the absolute positions of the three logical partitions in the extended partition on the disk, write the position of the second logical partition in the extended partition into the third item in the MBR, and modify the pointer of the first logical partition in the extended partition to point to the third logical partition in the extended partition, then the above - mentioned partition table can be created.
Last edited by 19951001 on 2007 - 8 - 21 at 06:17 PM ]
|
|
|
2007-8-21 18:13 |
|
|
zhangxue
初级用户
积分 183
发帖 82
注册 2006-3-28
状态 离线
|
『第 315 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
Acronis Disk Director可以在任何位置建立主分区，只要不超出主分区的数量限制。
dspt还有一个问题，最前面和最后面各一个分区为主分区的情况不算是特殊分区表吧，以往ibm的一键恢复就是这样子的，但是如果将后面那个主分区设置为活动分区，会出现第一个主分区(fat32格式)没有在dspt里面显示出盘符来,实际上dos是有给它分配盘符的。
Acronis Disk Director can create primary partitions anywhere, as long as it does not exceed the number limit of primary partitions.
dspt has another question. The situation where there is one primary partition at the front and one at the back is not considered a special partition table. In the past, IBM's one-click recovery was like this. But if the latter primary partition is set as the active partition, the first primary partition (in FAT32 format) will not show a drive letter in dspt. Actually, DOS has assigned a drive letter to it.
|
|
|
2007-8-21 21:21 |
|
