|
19951001
高级用户
流落街头
积分 570
发帖 272
注册 2005-10-17
来自 北京
状态 离线
|
『第 256 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
Originally posted by lianjiang2004 at 2007-6-21 07:25:
请教，diskrw和dsptw的差别是什么？以前版本是dspt包含diskrw和dpit的功能，现在测试版就两个文件，没有了dpit的win32版。所以问问新版是否有不同了。
diskrw 仍然是dsptw的一部分，只不过有人喜欢diskrw, 我就顺便把win32版本的放出来，dpit的win32版本有时间我会整理出来。
Last edited by 19951001 on 2007-6-21 at 08:56 PM ]
Originally posted by lianjiang2004 at 2007-6-21 07:25:
Ask, what is the difference between diskrw and dsptw? In previous versions, dspt included the functions of diskrw and dpit. Now in the beta version, there are only two files, and there is no win32 version of dpit. So I ask if there are any differences in the new version.
diskrw is still part of dsptw. It's just that some people like diskrw, so I simply released the win32 version. I will organize the win32 version of dpit when I have time.
Last edited by 19951001 on 2007-6-21 at 08:56 PM ]
|
|
 2007-6-21 20:26 |
|
|
19951001
高级用户
流落街头
积分 570
发帖 272
注册 2005-10-17
来自 北京
状态 离线
|
『第 257 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
Originally posted by lianjiang2004 at 2007-6-21 07:19:
贴上分区表部分数据，供参考。
8001010007FEFFFF3F00000081142A01
00000000000000000000000000000000
0000C1FF0FFEFFFFC0142A013E219D03
00000000000000000000000000000000
55AA
这个分区表比较特殊，是因为64字节的分区表项中第二个16字节全为0，如果在程序把全0作为分区表项结束的话，就只能备份出一个分区表项，我想Gotomsdos的程序中就犯了这个错误。
Originally posted by lianjiang2004 at 2007-6-21 07:19:
Paste part of the partition table data for reference.
8001010007FEFFFF3F00000081142A01
00000000000000000000000000000000
0000C1FF0FFEFFFFC0142A013E219D03
00000000000000000000000000000000
55AA
This partition table is special because the second 16 bytes in the 64-byte partition table entry are all zeros. If the program treats all zeros as the end of the partition table entry, it can only back up one partition table entry. I think the Gotomsdos program made this mistake.
|
|
|
2007-6-21 20:31 |
|
|
19951001
高级用户
流落街头
积分 570
发帖 272
注册 2005-10-17
来自 北京
状态 离线
|
『第 258 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
2007.6.21测试版本已经上传
to lianjiang2004:
请删除以前的版本。
Last edited by 19951001 on 2007-6-21 at 08:52 PM ]
The test version on 2007.6.21 has been uploaded
to lianjiang2004:
Please delete the previous version.
Last edited by 19951001 on 2007-6-21 at 08:52 PM ]
|
|
|
2007-6-21 20:46 |
|
|
lianjiang2004
金牌会员
积分 3946
发帖 1884
注册 2006-1-20
状态 离线
|
|
|
2007-6-21 22:06 |
|
|
terse
银牌会员
积分 2404
发帖 946
注册 2005-9-8
状态 离线
|
『第 260 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
Originally posted by 19951001 at 2007-6-20 23:25:
我一直想解决加载NTFS4DOS和IFS的dos盘符问题，我的思路是要在程序中自己判断是否加载了这两个程序，这个问题我一直没有解决，Gotomsdos使用了两 ...
之所以有这样的期盼,也因为如上所说的一些原因,还有就是DOS下不能得到NTFS分区的详细信息(譬如大小), 还有就是想用来判断多硬盘,虽说MINITO可以做到,但不在实模式的话必须加上参数,那样就得不到硬盘参数,变得无从选择,所以现在我是先用GDISK得到硬盘信息,以便直观的选择需操作硬盘(如有多硬盘),再运行MINITO,没别的意思,只是想让DOS下GHOST更为简便!
The reason for such expectations is also because of the reasons mentioned above, and also because under DOS, the detailed information (such as size) of the NTFS partition cannot be obtained. Also, it is wanted to be used to judge multiple hard disks. Although MINITO can do it, if it is not in real mode, parameters must be added, then the hard disk parameters cannot be obtained and there is no way to choose. So now I first use GDISK to get the hard disk information to intuitively select the hard disk to be operated (if there are multiple hard disks), and then run MINITO. There is no other meaning, just wanting to make GHOST under DOS more convenient!
|
|
|
2007-6-23 01:12 |
|
|
cba-xyz
中级用户
积分 295
发帖 70
注册 2003-7-24
状态 离线
|
『第 261 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
DOS版的DSPT不能正确显示TRUEIMAGE 安全区的卷标,分区标志是0XBC,改成0X1B可以正确识别安全区的卷标,请修正.
The DOS version of DSPT cannot correctly display the label of the TRUEIMAGE safe area. The partition flag is 0XBC. Changing it to 0X1B can correctly identify the label of the safe area. Please correct it.
|
|
|
2007-7-3 11:59 |
|
|
19951001
高级用户
流落街头
积分 570
发帖 272
注册 2005-10-17
来自 北京
状态 离线
|
『第 262 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
Originally posted by cba-xyz at 2007-7-3 11:59:
DOS版的DSPT不能正确显示TRUEIMAGE 安全区的卷标,分区标志是0XBC,改成0X1B可以正确识别安全区的卷标,请修正.
已经修正
Originally posted by cba-xyz at 2007-7-3 11:59:
The DOS version of DSPT cannot correctly display the volume label of the TRUEIMAGE safe area. The partition flag is 0XBC, changing it to 0X1B can correctly identify the volume label of the safe area. Please correct it.
Corrected
附件
1:  DSPT.rar (2007-7-3 19:04, 17.85 KiB,下载次数： 312)
|
|
|
2007-7-3 19:04 |
|
|
cba-xyz
中级用户
积分 295
发帖 70
注册 2003-7-24
状态 离线
|
『第 263 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
这下GHOST镜像放在ACRONIS的安全区一键恢复配合完美了。
Now the GHOST image is placed in the ACRONIS secure zone, and one - key recovery is perfectly coordinated.
|
|
|
2007-7-4 20:16 |
|
|
cba-xyz
中级用户
积分 295
发帖 70
注册 2003-7-24
状态 离线
|
『第 264 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
顺便问下有HPA的朋友在UNLOCK后运行DSPT能不能正确显示卷标？
By the way, friends who have HPA, after UNLOCK, can DSPT correctly display the volume label?
|
|
|
2007-7-4 20:19 |
|
|
wstest
新手上路
积分 9
发帖 5
注册 2005-10-26
状态 离线
|
『第 265 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
G:\usbhdd>DSPTW.EXE f: /pdr /Y
2:1
G:\>DSPTW.EXE f: /pdr /Y > drv.txt
The system cannot find the file specified.
DSPTW.exe 的部分命令行结果输出无法重定向到文件或者变量种...我现在遇到的问题就是无法进行后期处理...
G:\usbhdd>DSPTW.EXE f: /pdr /Y
2:1
G:\>DSPTW.EXE f: /pdr /Y > drv.txt
The system cannot find the file specified.
Part of the command line results output of DSPTW.exe cannot be redirected to a file or variable... The problem I am encountering now is that the post-processing cannot be carried out...
|
|
|
2007-7-9 15:16 |
|
|
19951001
高级用户
流落街头
积分 570
发帖 272
注册 2005-10-17
来自 北京
状态 离线
|
『第 266 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
Originally posted by wstest at 2007-7-9 15:16:
G:\usbhdd>DSPTW.EXE f: /pdr /Y
2:1
G:\>DSPTW.EXE f: /pdr /Y > drv.txt
The system cannot find the file specified.
DSPTW.exe 的部分命令行结果输出无法重定向到文 ...
在我这里测试没有问题，还有哪位朋友也遇到了类似的问题吗？
下面是我执行命令的结果：
Originally posted by wstest at 2007-7-9 15:16:
G:\usbhdd>DSPTW.EXE f: /pdr /Y
2:1
G:\>DSPTW.EXE f: /pdr /Y > drv.txt
The system cannot find the file specified.
Part of the command line results of DSPTW.exe cannot be redirected to the text...
There is no problem with my test here. Is there any friend who has encountered a similar problem?
The following is the result of my executing the command:
附件
1:  cmd.GIF (2007-7-9 18:56, 14.62 KiB,下载次数： 2)
|
|
|
2007-7-9 18:56 |
|
|
cba-xyz
中级用户
积分 295
发帖 70
注册 2003-7-24
状态 离线
|
|
|
2007-7-12 10:24 |
|
|
hlytg
初级用户
积分 21
发帖 10
注册 2006-5-26
状态 离线
|
『第 268 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
经测试: dspt 中检测的硬盘总扇区数与dsptw下检测的硬盘总扇区数不一致,dsptw检测有误,请修正.
Last edited by hlytg on 2007-7-12 at 04:24 PM ]
Tested: The total number of sectors of the hard disk detected in dspt is inconsistent with that detected in dsptw. There is an error in dsptw detection. Please correct it.
Last edited by hlytg on 2007-7-12 at 04:24 PM ]
|
|
|
2007-7-12 16:22 |
|
|
time868
初级用户
积分 56
发帖 29
注册 2007-4-1
状态 离线
|
『第 269 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
有时间下载下来看看.
Have time to download and take a look.
|
|
|
2007-7-12 16:26 |
|
|
19951001
高级用户
流落街头
积分 570
发帖 272
注册 2005-10-17
来自 北京
状态 离线
|
『第 270 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
Originally posted by hlytg at 2007-7-12 16:22:
经测试: dspt 中检测的硬盘总扇区数与dsptw下检测的硬盘总扇区数不一致,dsptw检测有误,请修正.
Last edited by hlytg on 2007-7-12 at 04:24 PM ]
dspt是使用扩展 Int13 得到的磁盘扇区数量，dsptw是在win32环境中使用deviceIocontrol得到的扇区总数，存在一定误差，最大误差为255×63个扇区，也就是7.8M。关于这个误差我在以前的帖子中做了说明
Last edited by 19951001 on 2007-7-12 at 11:18 PM ]
Originally posted by hlytg at 2007-7-12 16:22:
After testing: The total number of sectors of the hard disk detected in dspt is inconsistent with the total number of sectors of the hard disk detected in dsptw. There is an error in dsptw detection. Please correct it.
Last edited by hlytg on 2007-7-12 at 04:24 PM ]
dspt uses the extended Int13 to obtain the number of disk sectors. dsptw uses deviceIocontrol to obtain the total number of sectors in the win32 environment. There is a certain error. The maximum error is 255×63 sectors, which is 7.8M. I have explained this error in previous posts.
Last edited by 19951001 on 2007-7-12 at 11:18 PM ]
|
|
|
2007-7-12 22:53 |
|
