中国DOS联盟论坛

China DOS Union

-- Unite DOS · Advance DOS · Grow DOS --
Union site: www.cn-dos.net Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum
Guest | Log in | Register | Members | Search | China DOS Union
中国DOS联盟论坛
The time now is 2026-08-18 09:46
47,814 topics / 349,907 posts / today 0 new / 48,259 members
DOS软件下载 & 游戏分享 (下载室) » Which is the highest version of hd-copy written by the original author?
Printable Version  4,601 / 6
Floor1 solen Posted 2002-10-25 00:00
初级用户 Posts 20 Credits 180
I originally thought it was 2.3
The one here is 2.9
I've also seen a 3.0, really don't know which one it is
Floor2 Wengier Posted 2002-10-25 00:00
系统支持 Posts 10,521 Credits 27,736
Version 3.0 definitely wasn't written by the original author, but by a Chinese person. As for the current 2.9 version, a net friend sent it to me, but I don't know who actually wrote it either. The one originally posted was version 2.5, which should have been written by the original author, I guess!
Floor3 solen Posted 2002-10-25 00:00
初级用户 Posts 20 Credits 180
What exactly are the differences between these versions
Floor4 MYS Posted 2002-10-25 00:00
元老会员 Posts 1,637 Credits 5,170 From 广东佛山
As long as it's version 2.0a or above, there's not much difference in use.
Floor5 数据恢复 Posted 2002-10-26 00:00
初级用户 Posts 1 Credits 102
At most 2.3X.
Floor6 kickout Posted 2002-10-26 00:00
高级用户 Posts 135 Credits 667
Probably version 2.3R. Actually, as long as you settle on one version, that's OK. Just don't use 1.7. Hehe...
Floor7 zeroize Posted 2002-10-27 00:00
初级用户 Posts 3 Credits 110
2.9 is definitely fake, because there aren't any additions at all in the special features.
I have a 2.4 version modified by myself on hand, with some added features, including removing the related INI and CFG files, and it's also quite compatible with WIN2K/XP, but instead it has problems under DOS (the solution is to change the file attributes to read-only).
The last version the original German author released on the website was 2.3a. As for whether he privately distributed other versions, there's no way to know. Anyway, all the other so-called higher versions I've seen so far were rewritten by others, and some of them are actually not bad, better than this 2.9 version.
QQ:41577027


[ Contact the Union admin team - 中国DOS联盟 - Standard version ]
Sponsored by ifanr Inc | © 2001–2023