I originally thought it was 2.3
The one here is 2.9
I've also seen a 3.0, really don't know which one it is
The one here is 2.9
I've also seen a 3.0, really don't know which one it is
China DOS Union
Union site: www.cn-dos.net Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum
DOS stands for freedom, openness and progress. Let us work hard, learn from the openness and GNU spirit of FreeDOS and Linux, and together build and grow a free GNU GPL world!
中国DOS联盟论坛 » DOS软件下载 & 游戏分享 （下载室） » Which is the highest version of hd-copy written by the original author?
View 4,025 Replies 6
Original Poster
Posted 2002-10-25 00:00 · 中国 北京 联通
初级用户
★
Credits 180
Posts 20
Joined 2002-10-25 00:00
23-year member
UID 61
Gender Male
Posts 20
Joined 2002-10-25 00:00
23-year member
UID 61
Gender Male
Status Offline
Floor 2
Posted 2002-10-25 00:00 · 美国 肯塔基州 费耶特县 列克星敦 Charter_Communications
系统支持
★★★★★★
“新DOS时代”站长
Credits 27,736
Posts 10,521
Joined 2002-10-09 12:00
23-year member
UID 9
Posts 10,521
Joined 2002-10-09 12:00
23-year member
UID 9
Status Offline
Version 3.0 definitely wasn't written by the original author, but by a Chinese person. As for the current 2.9 version, a net friend sent it to me, but I don't know who actually wrote it either. The one originally posted was version 2.5, which should have been written by the original author, I guess!
Wengier - 新DOS时代
欢迎大家来到我的“新DOS时代”网站，里面有各类DOS软件和资料，地址：
http://wendos.mycool.net/
E-Mail & MSN: wengierwu AT hotmail.com （最近比较忙，有事请联系DOSroot和雨露，谢谢！）
欢迎大家来到我的“新DOS时代”网站，里面有各类DOS软件和资料，地址：
http://wendos.mycool.net/
E-Mail & MSN: wengierwu AT hotmail.com （最近比较忙，有事请联系DOSroot和雨露，谢谢！）
Floor 3
Posted 2002-10-25 00:00 · 中国 四川 成都 成都西维数码科技有限公司四川电信成都光华互联网数据中心节点
初级用户
★
Credits 180
Posts 20
Joined 2002-10-25 00:00
23-year member
UID 61
Gender Male
Posts 20
Joined 2002-10-25 00:00
23-year member
UID 61
Gender Male
Status Offline
What exactly are the differences between these versions
Floor 4
Posted 2002-10-25 00:00 · 中国 广东 佛山 禅城区 电信
元老会员
★★★★
Credits 5,170
Posts 1,637
Joined 2002-10-16 00:00
23-year member
UID 8
Gender Male
From 广东佛山
Posts 1,637
Joined 2002-10-16 00:00
23-year member
UID 8
Gender Male
From 广东佛山
Status Offline
As long as it's version 2.0a or above, there's not much difference in use.
我的网志
http://hzmys.blog.163.com/
我的网盘
firststep.qjwm.com
fsmys.ys168.com
ssmys.ys168.com
www.brsbox.com/fsmys
www.brsbox.com/ssmys
www.brsbox.com/ccdos
http://hzmys.blog.163.com/
我的网盘
firststep.qjwm.com
fsmys.ys168.com
ssmys.ys168.com
www.brsbox.com/fsmys
www.brsbox.com/ssmys
www.brsbox.com/ccdos
Floor 5
Posted 2002-10-26 00:00 · 中国 山东 烟台 联通
初级用户
★
DOS高手
Credits 102
Posts 1
Joined 2002-10-26 00:00
23-year member
UID 66
Gender Male
Posts 1
Joined 2002-10-26 00:00
23-year member
UID 66
Gender Male
Status Offline
At most 2.3X.
你丢数据-我恢复！
山东-烟台
0535-6663396
烟台的朋友多联系！！！
山东-烟台
0535-6663396
烟台的朋友多联系！！！
Floor 6
Posted 2002-10-26 00:00 · 中国 江西 吉安 电信
高级用户
★★
Credits 667
Posts 135
Joined 2002-10-25 00:00
23-year member
UID 62
Gender Male
Posts 135
Joined 2002-10-25 00:00
23-year member
UID 62
Gender Male
Status Offline
Probably version 2.3R. Actually, as long as you settle on one version, that's OK. Just don't use 1.7. Hehe...
================================= kickout
大功告成，打个Kiss!
大功告成，打个Kiss!
Floor 7
Posted 2002-10-27 00:00 · 中国 广东 广州 电信
初级用户
★
Credits 110
Posts 3
Joined 2002-10-27 00:00
23-year member
UID 76
Gender Male
Posts 3
Joined 2002-10-27 00:00
23-year member
UID 76
Gender Male
Status Offline
2.9 is definitely fake, because there aren't any additions at all in the special features.
I have a 2.4 version modified by myself on hand, with some added features, including removing the related INI and CFG files, and it's also quite compatible with WIN2K/XP, but instead it has problems under DOS (the solution is to change the file attributes to read-only).
The last version the original German author released on the website was 2.3a. As for whether he privately distributed other versions, there's no way to know. Anyway, all the other so-called higher versions I've seen so far were rewritten by others, and some of them are actually not bad, better than this 2.9 version.
QQ：41577027
I have a 2.4 version modified by myself on hand, with some added features, including removing the related INI and CFG files, and it's also quite compatible with WIN2K/XP, but instead it has problems under DOS (the solution is to change the file attributes to read-only).
The last version the original German author released on the website was 2.3a. As for whether he privately distributed other versions, there's no way to know. Anyway, all the other so-called higher versions I've seen so far were rewritten by others, and some of them are actually not bad, better than this 2.9 version.
QQ：41577027
Forum Jump: