China DOS Union

-- Unite DOS · Advance DOS · Grow DOS --
Union site: www.cn-dos.net　Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum

中国DOS联盟论坛
The time now is 2026-10-27 01:04

47,815 topics / 349,928 posts / today 0 new / 48,289 members

DOS启动盘 & LOGO技术（启动盘室） » Question for Wengier: Replacing the command interpreter on the boot disk

Floor1　willsort	Posted 2003-12-30 00:00
元老会员　Posts 1,512　Credits 4,432
To Wengier: I'd like to ask: if the command interpreter in your "Super Universal MS-DOS 7.10 Boot Disk" is replaced with a third-party product such as 4dos or ndos, will it affect the following features of the boot disk: 3 - Full Chinese and English long filename support 4 - Full (V)FAT12/16/32 support 5 - NTFS drive support 6 - USB drive support 7 - Large hard disk support 8 - Large memory support 9 - Support for various CD-ROM drives 10 - RAM disk functionality 14 - High system stability 21 - Strong system compatibility 22 - Very strong versatility 23 - Support for various protected-mode DOS programs I would appreciate your advice!

Floor2　Wengier	Posted 2003-12-30 00:00
系统支持　Posts 10,521　Credits 27,736
Replacing it with NDOS or an old version of 4DOS will seriously affect long filename support, while replacing it with a new version of 4DOS will leave insufficient disk space, and compatibility will also decrease.

Floor3　willsort	Posted 2003-12-30 00:00
元老会员　Posts 1,512　Credits 4,432
Re Wengier: Thanks for your reply. I still have a few questions: 1. Aside from the things you mentioned, will the other features be largely unaffected? 2. If the system is installed on the hard disk rather than on the boot disk, can the disk space issue be ignored? 3. How new does the newer version of 4dos need to be? Thanks again!

Floor4　Wengier	Posted 2003-12-30 00:00
系统支持　Posts 10,521　Credits 27,736
4DOS version 7.x is actually pretty good. It supports long filenames, and its features are also fairly decent. Unfortunately it has some bugs, and up to now I still haven't seen jpsoft fix them.