![]() |
China DOS Union-- Unite DOS · Advance DOS · Grow DOS --Union site: www.cn-dos.net Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum |
| Guest | Log in | Register | Members | Search | China DOS Union |
|
中国DOS联盟论坛 The time now is 2026-08-15 23:09 |
47,813 topics / 349,903 posts / today 1 new / 48,258 members |
| DOS疑难解答 & 问题讨论 (解答室) » mys, please come in! |
| Printable Version 878 / 8 |
| Floor1 minisheep | Posted 2002-12-18 00:00 |
| 高级用户 Posts 233 Credits 830 | |
|
I want to know the boot process of a ME boot disk! Can you write one about the ME boot disk!? Just like the one you wrote for the 98 boot disk!
|
|
| Floor2 MYS | Posted 2002-12-18 00:00 |
| 元老会员 Posts 1,637 Credits 5,170 From 广东佛山 | |
|
The stuff about the WIN98 boot disk wasn't written by me, it was reposted. I haven't tried the WINME boot disk yet.
|
|
| Floor3 Wengier | Posted 2002-12-18 00:00 |
| 系统支持 Posts 10,521 Credits 27,736 | |
|
Microsoft never released an MS-DOS 8.0 (WinME) boot disk, so there is no such thing as a built-in boot disk issue. Therefore, if there is an MS-DOS 8.0 boot disk, it was made by forum users themselves, so the contents will certainly be different and can't possibly be generalized.
|
|
| Floor4 minisheep | Posted 2002-12-18 00:00 |
| 高级用户 Posts 233 Credits 830 | |
|
I'm talking about the ME boot disk! Haven't you installed ME before?! Just like 98! During installation it lets you make a boot disk! Isn't that it?! It seems you can make one in ME's Control Panel too! Just like 98!
|
|
| Floor5 Wengier | Posted 2002-12-18 00:00 |
| 系统支持 Posts 10,521 Credits 27,736 | |
|
Isn't a WinME boot disk just an MS-DOS 8.0 boot disk? I can say I basically never used the WinME interface, but I have used an MS-DOS 8.0 boot disk, and it was a self-made WinME boot disk by which I booted into pure MS-DOS 8.0 myself without using any patches.
|
|
| Floor6 imp | Posted 2002-12-18 00:00 |
| 银牌会员 Posts 309 Credits 1,001 | |
|
The only good thing about msdos8.0 (don't know whether it counts as an advantage) is that it can load Umbpci.sys without loading Hiram.exe and himem.sys
As for the others, they don't seem as good as 7.1 |
|
| Floor7 MYS | Posted 2002-12-18 00:00 |
| 元老会员 Posts 1,637 Credits 5,170 From 广东佛山 | |
|
There should be one more advantage: you can see that DOS8's IO.SYS is only a little over 100K, about 100K less than DOS71.
|
|
| Floor8 Wengier | Posted 2002-12-18 00:00 |
| 系统支持 Posts 10,521 Credits 27,736 | |
|
What imp mentioned about MS-DOS 8.0 being able to load UMBPCI without loading HIMEM is actually because IO.SYS in MS-DOS 8.0 loads HIMEM.SYS automatically, so there is no need to load it manually. Its main enhancement is that it can support large hard disks over 60G. But overall it is still not as easy to use as MS-DOS 7.10.
|
|
| Floor9 ko20010214 | Posted 2003-07-04 00:00 |
| 版主 Posts 1,628 Credits 7,296 | |
|
Learn how to ask questions first.
Change your post title to something better. In the future, a post with a title like this may end up in only these three ways: 1。No one responds. (This is the best outcome.) 2。It gets moved to the chatter section. 3。It gets deleted. |
|
|
[ Contact the Union admin team -
中国DOS联盟 -
Standard version ] Sponsored by ifanr Inc | © 2001–2023 |