Would it be better to set up categorized platform boot options for different uses? - China DOS Union Forum

Actually, this idea of mine was influenced by Optimization Master. In its optimization options, it is divided into standard users, CD-burning users, etc., configuring and optimizing the system according to use. That's how it is in Windows. It should also be like this in DOS. In addition, most software has overlapping functions, and there are many functions you may never use in a lifetime. So can we choose the best ones and follow those?
Boot -- platform selection -- configuration optimization -- software selection -- software function selection. Form golden combination modules of functions. For example, as far as platforms are concerned, TW is very good for system maintenance, UCDOS for office work, DOS7.1 for programming, and so on. Each time the system starts, use F1_F12 to start separately according to the purpose. Don't aim for big and all-inclusive; instead emphasize being small and refined. That saves resources and also reduces conflicts, making system efficiency the highest.
Also, which kind expert has a DOS Chinese system maintenance disk? One like Norton 8.0. When a machine has a problem now, the whole screen is full of English, too hard to make sense of.

Floor1　tdj	Posted 2003-11-28 00:00
银牌会员　Posts 332　Credits 1,131
For example: each time the system starts, use F1_F12 as shortcut keys to start the corresponding module resources for system maintenance, network applications, office system, etc. separately. And optimize the system configuration according to the purpose. Wouldn't that be better, saving resources and reducing conflicts?

Floor2　Wengier	Posted 2003-11-29 00:00
系统支持　Posts 10,521　Credits 27,736
I don't quite understand what you mean?

Floor3　tdj	Posted 2003-11-29 00:00
银牌会员　Posts 332　Credits 1,131
Actually, this idea of mine was influenced by Optimization Master. In its optimization options, it is divided into standard users, CD-burning users, etc., configuring and optimizing the system according to use. That's how it is in Windows. It should also be like this in DOS. In addition, most software has overlapping functions, and there are many functions you may never use in a lifetime. So can we choose the best ones and follow those? Boot -- platform selection -- configuration optimization -- software selection -- software function selection. Form golden combination modules of functions. For example, as far as platforms are concerned, TW is very good for system maintenance, UCDOS for office work, DOS7.1 for programming, and so on. Each time the system starts, use F1_F12 to start separately according to the purpose. Don't aim for big and all-inclusive; instead emphasize being small and refined. That saves resources and also reduces conflicts, making system efficiency the highest. Also, which kind expert has a DOS Chinese system maintenance disk? One like Norton 8.0. When a machine has a problem now, the whole screen is full of English, too hard to make sense of.