Many fellow members have already discussed a lot of the technical issues, so I won't go into them at length here.
A few points that need to be pointed out are: (purely personal opinion, does not represent the Union's intentions)
1, the functions of 98;
Some mini98 versions removed DX, losing multimedia functions.
Some do not support connecting to the Internet。。
Some do not support running many win programs.
And so on。。。。。
I think that, as an operating system, functionality is of crucial importance. Stressing streamlining on the premise of losing functionality is almost equivalent to being meaningless.
2, the portability of mini98;
Most mini98 versions only support drive C. This greatly limits its running on a CD.
3, the issue of Chinese fonts;
Chinese fonts take up a large portion of the space in mini98. Can some other Chinese-language platform be used instead? On this point, the ucwin proposed by fellow member 菜鸟 back in the DOS era was a very good idea, unfortunately it is still not very complete.
4, the issue of memory usage;
98 Second Edition uses about 10m more memory than 98 First Edition
5, the issue of multi-system compatibility;
As everyone knows, operating systems have developed to this day and gone through many changes, and the situation is already one of a hundred flowers blooming. So we need to consider the coexistence of multiple systems on CD, as well as mini98's compatibility with some other excellent programs from the MS series operating systems. For example, running programs such as win32 in mini98...
(For anything not covered above, I invite all fellow members to speak freely and add to and improve it.)
I hope all fellow members will put forward your own ideas about mini98's functions and usage requirements, and actively reply below.
I hope all fellow members will sort out and summarize your own research心得 on mini98, and reply below。。
So here I thank all fellow members.！
A few points that need to be pointed out are: (purely personal opinion, does not represent the Union's intentions)
1, the functions of 98;
Some mini98 versions removed DX, losing multimedia functions.
Some do not support connecting to the Internet。。
Some do not support running many win programs.
And so on。。。。。
I think that, as an operating system, functionality is of crucial importance. Stressing streamlining on the premise of losing functionality is almost equivalent to being meaningless.
2, the portability of mini98;
Most mini98 versions only support drive C. This greatly limits its running on a CD.
3, the issue of Chinese fonts;
Chinese fonts take up a large portion of the space in mini98. Can some other Chinese-language platform be used instead? On this point, the ucwin proposed by fellow member 菜鸟 back in the DOS era was a very good idea, unfortunately it is still not very complete.
4, the issue of memory usage;
98 Second Edition uses about 10m more memory than 98 First Edition
5, the issue of multi-system compatibility;
As everyone knows, operating systems have developed to this day and gone through many changes, and the situation is already one of a hundred flowers blooming. So we need to consider the coexistence of multiple systems on CD, as well as mini98's compatibility with some other excellent programs from the MS series operating systems. For example, running programs such as win32 in mini98...
(For anything not covered above, I invite all fellow members to speak freely and add to and improve it.)
I hope all fellow members will put forward your own ideas about mini98's functions and usage requirements, and actively reply below.
I hope all fellow members will sort out and summarize your own research心得 on mini98, and reply below。。
So here I thank all fellow members.！
弄花香满衣，掬水月在手。
明月鹭鸟飞， 芦花白马走。
我自一过后，野渡现横舟。
青云碧空在，净瓶水不流。
http://dos.e-stone.cn/guestbook/index.asp
＝＝＝＝＝＝中國DOS聯盟＝＝＝＝＝
我的新网页http://rsds.7i24.com欢迎光顾
明月鹭鸟飞， 芦花白马走。
我自一过后，野渡现横舟。
青云碧空在，净瓶水不流。
http://dos.e-stone.cn/guestbook/index.asp
＝＝＝＝＝＝中國DOS聯盟＝＝＝＝＝
我的新网页http://rsds.7i24.com欢迎光顾
