![]() |
China DOS Union-- Unite DOS · Advance DOS · Grow DOS --Union site: www.cn-dos.net Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum |
| Guest | Log in | Register | Members | Search | China DOS Union |
|
中国DOS联盟论坛 The time now is 2026-10-26 15:15 |
47,815 topics / 349,928 posts / today 0 new / 48,288 members |
| DOS启动盘 & LOGO技术 (启动盘室) » A boot disk made by a Japanese person |
| Printable Version 1,094 / 6 |
| Floor1 SUNRISEYUEN | Posted 2003-09-27 00:00 |
| 初级用户 Posts 23 Credits 165 | |
|
http://mr.kdn.gr.jp/dl/DRDOS_R2.LZH
There are some things worth learning from it. |
|
| Floor2 Wengier | Posted 2003-09-27 00:00 |
| 系统支持 Posts 10,521 Credits 27,736 | |
|
It's a DR-DOS 7.05 boot disk, right? Of course it supports FAT32 and large hard disks. And if you use STRINGS VER to check the version number, it's 7.10, so unlike cases where some programs won't run because the version is different, it doesn't have that problem with MS-DOS 7.10, ROM-DOS 7.10, PC-DOS 7.10, and so on. Not bad.
|
|
| Floor3 SUNRISEYUEN | Posted 2003-09-27 00:00 |
| 初级用户 Posts 23 Credits 165 | |
|
You only looked at its version, but there are some very small applications inside. Very nice. He also used compression software with an extremely high compression ratio. In those two compressed software packages, there are some tools and network application programs, like ftp.....
|
|
| Floor4 Roy | Posted 2003-09-27 00:00 |
| 管理员 Posts 1,633 Credits 4,869 | |
The following is quoted from sunriseyuen's post at 2003-9-27 13:34:06:Sheesh......the compatibility is lacking....umbpci's compatibility is lacking... And uharc itself is too large.....might as well use cab/zip instead. |
|
| Floor5 Wengier | Posted 2003-09-27 00:00 |
| 系统支持 Posts 10,521 Credits 27,736 | |
|
Actually, all I could really look at was its DOS version. I already had the other software long ago, not to mention that the UMBPCI version in it is so low. And one more very important point: when I used it to boot directly, the result was a hang, so I cleaned out the CONFIG.SYS and AUTOEXEC.BAT files completely, and deleted the other files too, then it was OK.
|
|
| Floor6 如是大师 | Posted 2003-09-28 00:00 |
| 元老会员 Posts 3,351 Credits 9,654 From 湖北 | |
|
The compatibility isn't very good..
|
|
| Floor7 Wengier | Posted 2003-09-28 00:00 |
| 系统支持 Posts 10,521 Credits 27,736 | |
The following is quoted from 如是大师's post at 2003-9-28 0:41:17: Yeah, that's why at the top I only said DR-DOS 7.05 itself is still okay, but as for the others.. |
|
|
[ Contact the Union admin team -
中国DOS联盟 -
Standard version ] Sponsored by ifanr Inc | © 2001–2023 |