![]() |
China DOS Union-- Unite DOS · Advance DOS · Grow DOS --Union site: www.cn-dos.net Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum |
| Guest | Log in | Register | Members | Search | China DOS Union |
|
中国DOS联盟论坛 The time now is 2026-08-16 02:51 |
47,813 topics / 349,903 posts / today 1 new / 48,258 members |
| DOS疑难解答 & 问题讨论 (解答室) » Which is better for DEVICEHIGH=EMM386 RAM, or NOEMS? |
| Printable Version 1,875 / 2 |
| Floor1 animator | Posted 2003-09-15 00:00 |
| 初级用户 Posts 11 Credits 134 | |
|
Question: how should the uses of
DEVICEHIGH=EMM386.EXE RAM and DEVICEHIGH=EMM386.EXE EMS as well as DEVICEHIGH=EMM386.EXE NOEMS be understood? I checked some websites, and some places say the parameter after it is best set to RAM, while others say to use NOEMS. On foreign websites, there are also different ways of loading EMM36.EXE |
|
| Floor2 Wengier | Posted 2003-09-16 00:00 |
| 系统支持 Posts 10,521 Credits 27,736 | |
|
That depends on whether you prefer UMB memory more or EMS memory more. If you prefer UMB, use NOEMS; if you prefer EMS, use RAM.
|
|
| Floor3 iceboy | Posted 2003-09-19 00:00 |
| 银牌会员 Posts 512 Credits 1,681 | |
XMS is controlled by HIMEM.SYS, EMS is controlled by EMM386.EXE, while UMB is controlled by UMBPCI.SYS and is also shared with EMM386.EXE. If you remove FRAME=NONE and change DC00-EFFF to D800-EFFF, and it doesn't hang, then the memory will be a bit larger... |
|
|
[ Contact the Union admin team -
中国DOS联盟 -
Standard version ] Sponsored by ifanr Inc | © 2001–2023 |