China DOS Union

Don't be so lazy and head down the wrong road, I have to criticize you strictly!
First of all, the 9x and NT series are not DOS; only 3x and DOS are the real thing. I also want to regard the NT series as 32-bit DOS. XP really is beautiful and very stable; calling it DOS is nothing more than finding an excuse because you want to use XP. The NT series has 5 subsystems: win32, win16（emulated）,dos( emulated）,posix,os/2. 9x is programmed in 16/32-bit code, and DOS there is also emulated. Desktop UNIX systems also have DOS emulators, for example SCO openserver has one. Please hurry up and develop a new DOS system. Can you bear to watch windows.linux,unix get better day by day?

Win9x is DOS. Have you made MiniWin3.x and MiniWin9x?

I want to ask the webmaster, have you finished miniwin9X? How big is miniwin9X?

miniwin98 is in sections like "DOS boot disk" on the forum.

And today I found another piece of evidence from this Win98 that “Win98 is a DOS program.” That is, the example of starting Win98 under MS-DOS 7.0. Since MS-DOS 7.0 does not support FAT32 partitions, when Win98 is run under MS-DOS 7.0, Win98 likewise cannot see FAT32 partitions; but if Win98 is run under MS-DOS 7.10 or MS-DOS 8.0, since they support FAT32, FAT32 partitions can then also be seen in Win98. This shows that Win98 relies on DOS, and like Win3.x, is only a 32-bit GUI for DOS program, right?

What it is isn't important. Who brings out more value in actual use? That's what matters most.