China DOS Union

Wengier and all great experts, I want to ask if there is any software that can package batch files (*.BAT) and the software (*.exe, *.bat, etc.) that the batch processing needs to call into an EXE file together, and this EXE can run under DOS

???
http://www2.zzu.edu.cn/ie/newdos/dispbbs.asp?boardID=11&ID=6064

The following is a quote from LK on 2003-8-18 11:54:51:
???
http://www2.zzu.edu.cn/ie/newdos/dispbbs.asp?boardID=11&ID=6064

Stingy, holding a grudge so much, I just wanted to make the directory neater...

I agree!!!!!

Everyone, come on and talk!!! (LK, don't gloat)

The following is a quote from ylpoplove on 2003-8-18 11:31:32:
Dear Wengier and all experts, I would like to ask if there is any software that can package batch files (*.BAT) and the software (*.exe, *.bat, ...) that the batch processing needs to call into an EXE file together. This EXE should be able to run under DOS.

Why not package it into ARJ SFX?

ARJ SFX???

Can you briefly talk about it, ROY? You are now a prominent figure in the DOS forum. Please explain, I'm all ears

1. Can it be self-extracted with command-line parameters under DOS?
2. Can it automatically run a specified software after self-extraction?
3. Can it automatically return to the original position after running?
Thanks

Rtd.exe, xlink and so on are all okay.

The following is a quote from pfox on 2003-8-19 1:14:34:
Rtd.exe, xlink and so on are all okay.

Oh, really? I'll check some information on the Internet first, thanks

BAT2EXE -- but some commands (e.g. for, if) are unstable
BAT TO EXE -- a bit stronger

It is best to use SFX (like the one mentioned upstairs) -- but a virtual disk or temporary directory is needed

so.. QBASIC is the best.. it is my fav.!

I checked some information online and thought that the XLINK and RTD DAT mentioned by PFOX can probably link the EXE or files that a batch script converted to EXE using BAT2EXE needs to call. But maybe because these two software are too old, I searched for a long time and couldn't find them...

Let's discuss it everyone: ) It's definitely a step forward compared to some boot disks that set up temporary directories...

QBASIC is temporarily not considered, because it's not as good as trying to learn C language, haha...

QbasiC?? Just because I'm too lazy to learn programming... : )

But if I'm motivated to learn programming, I think it's better to learn the C language, but I have C# installed on my computer. However, programs written in C# can't run under DOS. But I really like making boot disks that do something before officially entering the graphical window...

Alas, really conflicting and exploring...
Everyone, do you have any good suggestions: )

QBASIC is too simple... No need to learn (just look at the primary school QBASIC textbook)

The following is a quote from iceboy at 18:22:50 on 2003-8-19:
QBASIC is too simple... No need to learn (just look at the primary school QBASIC textbook)

Oh………, I don't know if ICEBOY is helping me or stepping on me hard, ha……