Suggest that the moderators and experts in the forum carry out secondary development of the DOS system, making it have the original flexibility and convenience, as well as the colorful features of Windows. I don't believe that foreigners can do it, while Chinese people can't.
China DOS Union
Union site: www.cn-dos.net Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum
DOS stands for freedom, openness and progress. Let us work hard, learn from the openness and GNU spirit of FreeDOS and Linux, and together build and grow a free GNU GPL world!
中国DOS联盟论坛 » 意见反馈 & 网友交流 » Suggest experts to develop DOS again
View 3,114 Replies 5
Original Poster
Posted 2011-01-20 21:18 · 中国 广东 东莞 中移铁通
Floor 2
Posted 2011-01-21 21:57 · 中国 广西 联通
What kind of appearance do you hope DOS to have?
Floor 3
Posted 2011-01-22 14:45 · 中国 辽宁 鞍山 电信
版主
★★
Credits 709
Posts 287
Joined 2010-01-13 12:05
16-year member
UID 158583
Gender Female
From 尖竹汶府
Posts 287
Joined 2010-01-13 12:05
16-year member
UID 158583
Gender Female
From 尖竹汶府
Status Offline
The meaning of LZ is probably to make DOS have a GUI interface and be able to operate with a mouse!
弟控才是王道阿
Floor 4
Posted 2011-01-24 21:18 · 中国 广东 东莞 中移铁通
Heheh, I don't have a very specific and clear concept of what DOS should become. Just as Vista2008 said, it's best to support mouse operation. But this seems to reduce the flavor of DOS. If it doesn't support the mouse, it's a fatal blow for us who do design and draw 3D graphics. I just don't want DOS to exit history.
Floor 5
Posted 2011-01-24 21:59 · 中国 上海 杨浦区 电信
DOS倒下了，但永远不死
DOS NEVER DIES !
投票调查：
http://www.cn-dos.net/forum/viewthread.php?tid=46187
本人尚未解决的疑难问题：
http://www.cn-dos.net/forum/viewthread.php?tid=15135
http://www.cn-dos.net/forum/viewthread.php?tid=47663
http://www.cn-dos.net/forum/viewthread.php?tid=48747
DOS NEVER DIES !
投票调查：
http://www.cn-dos.net/forum/viewthread.php?tid=46187
本人尚未解决的疑难问题：
http://www.cn-dos.net/forum/viewthread.php?tid=15135
http://www.cn-dos.net/forum/viewthread.php?tid=47663
http://www.cn-dos.net/forum/viewthread.php?tid=48747
Floor 6
Posted 2011-01-25 13:20 · 巴西 里约热内卢州 里约热内卢 Microsoft
Personally, I think it's completely unnecessary.
If you need a system with separated kernel and graphical interface, you can just use UNIX/Linux, which is much more powerful than DOS in all aspects, and also more powerful than Windows except for gaming and entertainment.
Many old DOS applications can mostly find alternatives on the Windows platform, so it's not worth spending energy on DOS.
Just for nostalgia, I think virtual machine + DOS 6.22 + Windows 3.1 is enough, original flavor.
If you need a system with separated kernel and graphical interface, you can just use UNIX/Linux, which is much more powerful than DOS in all aspects, and also more powerful than Windows except for gaming and entertainment.
Many old DOS applications can mostly find alternatives on the Windows platform, so it's not worth spending energy on DOS.
Just for nostalgia, I think virtual machine + DOS 6.22 + Windows 3.1 is enough, original flavor.
Forum Jump: