China DOS Union

-- Unite DOS · Advance DOS · Grow DOS --
Union site: www.cn-dos.net　Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum

中国DOS联盟论坛
The time now is 2026-08-26 15:49

47,812 topics / 349,910 posts / today 0 new / 48,264 members

其它操作系统综合讨论区 » A small delay tool wait.exe under the NT command line

Floor1　mac007cn	Posted 2010-03-11 16:13
初级用户　Posts 18　Credits 46
I haven't been to cn-dos for a long time. Recently, when writing batch scripts under the command line of NT (2k, xp, 2k3, etc.), I used delay. I didn't like using ping -n X 127.1 >nul. Later, I found a delay tool wait.exe that seemed to be 32-bit on Google. I don't dare to keep it to myself, and please don't laugh. The size of wait.exe is quite large, 32K. I don't know if it can be compressed. Attachments Wait100.zip (13.1 KiB)

Floor3　Roy	Posted 2010-04-14 18:46
管理员　Posts 1,633　Credits 4,869
The sleep.exe in the Resource Kit has the same function.

Floor4　doslike	Posted 2010-06-05 18:50
版主　Posts 285　Credits 326　From 黑龙江省
sleep.vbs wscript.sleep %1 Not sure if it's correct

Floor5　sygate	Posted 2010-06-19 13:54
新手上路　Posts 9　Credits 12
Where can I download the 2000 Resource Kit now? I've been looking for it for a long time.

Floor6　netwinxp	Posted 2010-06-29 21:30
高级用户　Posts 366　Credits 741
The delay obtained with sleep() has very low precision and consumes quite a bit of CPU usage. If you want to achieve millisecond or even microsecond level, you need to use the QueryPerformanceFrequency() and QueryPerformanceCounter() functions. Of course, the kind of application the LZ mentioned can be done with the sleep() function. After the World Cup, I'll compile one with masm32, and it's estimated to be at most a few KB. [ Last edited by netwinxp on 2010-6-29 at 21:32 ]

Floor8　martin325	Posted 2010-09-12 15:37
银牌会员　Posts 603　Credits 1,582
I use WAIT4, less than 2KB See attachment Attachments WAIT4.rar (1.42 KiB)

Floor9　wxs81514	Posted 2010-11-09 17:23
初级用户　Posts 52　Credits 118
Which one occupies fewer resources?? Try them one by one...........