我是女孩，我怕谁？
China DOS Union
Union site: www.cn-dos.net Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum
DOS stands for freedom, openness and progress. Let us work hard, learn from the openness and GNU spirit of FreeDOS and Linux, and together build and grow a free GNU GPL world!
中国DOS联盟论坛 » DOS启动盘 & LOGO技术 （启动盘室） » One Example of Memory Adjustment on a Boot Floppy
View 907 Replies 7
Original Poster
Posted 2003-07-09 00:00 · 中国 辽宁 沈阳 联通
初级用户
★★
Credits 672
Posts 216
Joined 2003-06-12 00:00
23-year member
UID 4976
Gender Female
Posts 216
Joined 2003-06-12 00:00
23-year member
UID 4976
Gender Female
Status Offline
Floor 2
Posted 2003-07-09 00:00 · 美国 肯塔基州 费耶特县 列克星敦 Charter_Communications
系统支持
★★★★★★
“新DOS时代”站长
Credits 27,736
Posts 10,521
Joined 2002-10-09 12:00
23-year member
UID 9
Posts 10,521
Joined 2002-10-09 12:00
23-year member
UID 9
Status Offline
"Another way is to replace bulky programs with compact programs that are faster and use less memory. Don't blindly trust authority; Microsoft is not necessarily very good."
Well said! Things like the oakcdrom.sys that comes with 98 really aren't very good~~ vide-cdd.sys and the like are much better.。
Well said! Things like the oakcdrom.sys that comes with 98 really aren't very good~~ vide-cdd.sys and the like are much better.。
Wengier - 新DOS时代
欢迎大家来到我的“新DOS时代”网站，里面有各类DOS软件和资料，地址：
http://wendos.mycool.net/
E-Mail & MSN: wengierwu AT hotmail.com （最近比较忙，有事请联系DOSroot和雨露，谢谢！）
欢迎大家来到我的“新DOS时代”网站，里面有各类DOS软件和资料，地址：
http://wendos.mycool.net/
E-Mail & MSN: wengierwu AT hotmail.com （最近比较忙，有事请联系DOSroot和雨露，谢谢！）
Floor 3
Posted 2003-07-09 00:00 · 中国 上海 电信
金牌会员
★★★★
小飞侠
Credits 4,590
Posts 1,812
Joined 2003-04-02 00:00
23-year member
UID 1400
Gender Male
From 上海市
Posts 1,812
Joined 2003-04-02 00:00
23-year member
UID 1400
Gender Male
From 上海市
Status Offline
What the moderator said makes sense!
Floor 4
Posted 2003-07-09 00:00 · 中国 湖北 随州 电信
元老会员
★★★
Credits 1,987
Posts 632
Joined 2002-10-27 00:00
23-year member
UID 73
Gender Male
Posts 632
Joined 2002-10-27 00:00
23-year member
UID 73
Gender Male
Status Offline
UMBPCI really is much better than EMM386 at providing UMB, but there are too many motherboards it doesn't support.
SHSUCDX is much better than MSCDEX.
DISKGEN really isn't good; switch to SPFDISK.
SHSUCDX is much better than MSCDEX.
DISKGEN really isn't good; switch to SPFDISK.
http://dos.e-stone.cn/dosbbs
uploadImages/200311161145850422.swf
uploadImages/200311161145850422.swf
Floor 5
Posted 2003-07-09 00:00 · 中国 香港
The following is quoted from yiyesong's post at 2003-7-9 22:45:37:It's UMB...
UMBPCI really is much better than EMM386 at providing UBM, but there are too many motherboards it doesn't support.
SHSUCDX is much better than MSCDEX.
DISKGEN really isn't good; switch to SPFDISK.
\_____Upper
\_____Memory
\_____Block
Floor 6
Posted 2003-07-10 00:00 · 中国 湖北 随州 电信
元老会员
★★★
Credits 1,987
Posts 632
Joined 2002-10-27 00:00
23-year member
UID 73
Gender Male
Posts 632
Joined 2002-10-27 00:00
23-year member
UID 73
Gender Male
Status Offline
ROY, sorry, that was a typo. You're really attentive, I corrected it.
http://dos.e-stone.cn/dosbbs
uploadImages/200311161145850422.swf
uploadImages/200311161145850422.swf
Floor 7
Posted 2003-07-11 00:00 · 中国 辽宁 沈阳 联通
初级用户
★★
Credits 672
Posts 216
Joined 2003-06-12 00:00
23-year member
UID 4976
Gender Female
Posts 216
Joined 2003-06-12 00:00
23-year member
UID 4976
Gender Female
Status Offline
Between shsucdx and mscdex version 2.23 + cloaking, which one is actually better? I think the latter uses less memory space (4k), while the former uses less disk space.
我是女孩，我怕谁？
Floor 8
Posted 2003-07-11 00:00 · 美国 肯塔基州 费耶特县 列克星敦 Charter_Communications
系统支持
★★★★★★
“新DOS时代”站长
Credits 27,736
Posts 10,521
Joined 2002-10-09 12:00
23-year member
UID 9
Posts 10,521
Joined 2002-10-09 12:00
23-year member
UID 9
Status Offline
The following is quoted from dos时代菜鸟's post at 2003-7-11 2:57:31:
Between shsucdx and mscdex 2.23 + cloaking, which one is actually better? I think the latter uses less memory space (4k), while the former uses less disk space.
Actually, each has its own advantages.。It depends on which aspect you care about more. If you care more about disk space, then Shsucd 1.4/2.0 is better; for example, that's what I used in my fully Chinese MiniWin3.2 boot disk. But if you care more about memory usage, then Cloaking+Mscdex is better; for example, that's what I use in the Super MS-DOS 7.10 boot disk I made, as well as on my current hard disk. As for Shsucdx, its memory usage is a bit larger. Version 2.0 uses 9KB of UMB memory on my machine (I currently have two CD-ROM drives).
As for compatibility, actually each of them has its own strengths and weaknesses by comparison, but due to space, I won't go into detail here~~
Wengier - 新DOS时代
欢迎大家来到我的“新DOS时代”网站，里面有各类DOS软件和资料，地址：
http://wendos.mycool.net/
E-Mail & MSN: wengierwu AT hotmail.com （最近比较忙，有事请联系DOSroot和雨露，谢谢！）
欢迎大家来到我的“新DOS时代”网站，里面有各类DOS软件和资料，地址：
http://wendos.mycool.net/
E-Mail & MSN: wengierwu AT hotmail.com （最近比较忙，有事请联系DOSroot和雨露，谢谢！）
Forum Jump: