The forum is lacking an important topic. It is suggested that the moderator add a brand - new section! - China DOS Union Forum

The appeal of DOS lies in its command line, basic nature and simplicity, but it is increasingly unable to keep up with the development of the current fully 32-bit Windows. And Windows PE is basically a 32-bit DOS system. Therefore, it is suggested that the forum moderator add a section for discussing and developing Windows PE system. Studying this system may effectively promote the development of China's operating system. Let everyone not stay only on a system that is gradually being eliminated. Only then can there be great development prospects. At the same time, it will not deviate from the purpose of the DOS Union and can greatly enhance the reputation of this website.
At present, there are many software that can perform system operations on a 32-bit operating system level with a single disk in a non-graphical interface or quasi-graphical interface. For example, Active@ series software, Partition Image recovery disks and some other system recovery software. It seems that similar functional-level technologies have not yet appeared in our country. Most of the technologies of domestic non-graphical interface single-disk system maintenance software (mostly for antivirus) are still based on 16-bit operating systems and operate on FAT disks. Don't you all feel that we are behind others in this regard! Moderator, hurry up and pay attention to my suggestion!

It's not a bad idea to set up a WinPE section. Everyone, please put forward more suggestions. Thank you!

First, a download link for WINPE should be provided so that everyone can have a try. I also want to see WINPE. It seems quite good...

It's just too big. The practicality of WinPE is still there... But I always feel it's big. Not concise. It's not impossible for DOS to develop a graphical interface.

It is completely feasible to use DOS as the underlying platform of the graphical interface system, and Windows 9x is a typical representative!

Sorry, I don't agree with you

If it is really necessary to open this section, then it might as well open a "32-bit DOS" section. I believe everyone is interested in this.

The following is a quote from lydong on 2003-7-8 19:50:55:
If it is really necessary to open this section, then it might as well open a "32-bit DOS" section. I believe everyone is interested in this.

Agreed. After establishment, GNU/FreeDOS 32 should be the first, while WinPE can only be second. After all, GNU DOS is the real goal of the alliance~~ Sandy is right~~

There is new content, good, support!

I actually care about compatibility, functionality, and miniaturization. Compatibility means fully being compatible with FAT and NTFS, and it would be even better if it can also be compatible with file formats of operating systems like Linux; functionality means being able to carry out complete system maintenance, and it would be best to have powerful system maintenance software like Active@ Unerase; miniaturization means it would be best to be able to handle it on a floppy disk, and if not, it can also be handled on a flash drive. As for whether it is WinPE, I agree with the views of floor 7 and Wengier. If such a system can be made, I think the China DOS Union won't worry about funds.

Floor1　biolover	Posted 2003-07-04 00:00
中级用户　Posts 80　Credits 300
The appeal of DOS lies in its command line, basic nature and simplicity, but it is increasingly unable to keep up with the development of the current fully 32-bit Windows. And Windows PE is basically a 32-bit DOS system. Therefore, it is suggested that the forum moderator add a section for discussing and developing Windows PE system. Studying this system may effectively promote the development of China's operating system. Let everyone not stay only on a system that is gradually being eliminated. Only then can there be great development prospects. At the same time, it will not deviate from the purpose of the DOS Union and can greatly enhance the reputation of this website. At present, there are many software that can perform system operations on a 32-bit operating system level with a single disk in a non-graphical interface or quasi-graphical interface. For example, Active@ series software, Partition Image recovery disks and some other system recovery software. It seems that similar functional-level technologies have not yet appeared in our country. Most of the technologies of domestic non-graphical interface single-disk system maintenance software (mostly for antivirus) are still based on 16-bit operating systems and operate on FAT disks. Don't you all feel that we are behind others in this regard! Moderator, hurry up and pay attention to my suggestion!

Floor2　Wengier	Posted 2003-07-05 00:00
系统支持　Posts 10,521　Credits 27,736
It's not a bad idea to set up a WinPE section. Everyone, please put forward more suggestions. Thank you!

Floor3　LanE	Posted 2003-07-06 00:00
银牌会员　Posts 648　Credits 1,835
First, a download link for WINPE should be provided so that everyone can have a try. I also want to see WINPE. It seems quite good...

Floor4　如是大师	Posted 2003-07-06 00:00
元老会员　Posts 3,351　Credits 9,654　From 湖北
It's just too big. The practicality of WinPE is still there... But I always feel it's big. Not concise. It's not impossible for DOS to develop a graphical interface.

Floor5　红色狂想	Posted 2003-07-06 00:00
金牌会员　Posts 1,501　Credits 4,289　From 河南省
It is completely feasible to use DOS as the underlying platform of the graphical interface system, and Windows 9x is a typical representative!

Floor6　Sandy	Posted 2003-07-08 00:00
元老会员　Posts 157　Credits 608
Sorry, I don't agree with you

Floor7　Lydong	Posted 2003-07-08 00:00
元老会员　Posts 407　Credits 1,468　From 广州
If it is really necessary to open this section, then it might as well open a "32-bit DOS" section. I believe everyone is interested in this.

Floor8　Wengier	Posted 2003-07-09 00:00
系统支持　Posts 10,521　Credits 27,736
*The following is a quote from lydong* on 2003-7-8 19:50:55:** If it is really necessary to open this section, then it might as well open a "32-bit DOS" section. I believe everyone is interested in this. Agreed. After establishment, GNU/FreeDOS 32 should be the first, while WinPE can only be second. After all, GNU DOS is the real goal of the alliance~~ Sandy is right~~

Floor9　hunome	Posted 2003-07-12 00:00
银牌会员　Posts 721　Credits 2,265
There is new content, good, support!

Floor10　biolover	Posted 2003-07-16 00:00
中级用户　Posts 80　Credits 300
I actually care about compatibility, functionality, and miniaturization. Compatibility means fully being compatible with FAT and NTFS, and it would be even better if it can also be compatible with file formats of operating systems like Linux; functionality means being able to carry out complete system maintenance, and it would be best to have powerful system maintenance software like Active@ Unerase; miniaturization means it would be best to be able to handle it on a floppy disk, and if not, it can also be handled on a flash drive. As for whether it is WinPE, I agree with the views of floor 7 and Wengier. If such a system can be made, I think the China DOS Union won't worry about funds.