China DOS Union

-- Unite DOS · Advance DOS · Grow DOS --
Union site: www.cn-dos.net　Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum

中国DOS联盟论坛
The time now is 2026-08-19 16:06

47,814 topics / 349,908 posts / today 0 new / 48,259 members

DOS疑难解答 & 问题讨论（解答室） » HP 6515b Automatic Shutdown Issue in Pure DOS

Floor1　tmt2006	Posted 2008-12-06 10:36
初级用户　Posts 49　Credits 135
A HP 6515b notebook can be normally restarted and shut down under Windows, but cannot use software to automatically shut down under DOS 7.1 (don't tell me to press the button). Tried many small programs and methods such as shutdown(DOS), off, power, win /z, grub's halt command, etc., but all to no avail. Originally thought it was a problem with the program loading configuration in Config.sys, but after tossing for many days, it still couldn't be solved. PE can also automatically shut down, but DOS just can't. I wonder if any expert has a solution? Is DOS really completely retired? [ Last edited by tmt2006 on 2008-12-6 at 10:38 ]

Floor2　DOSforever	Posted 2008-12-06 18:12
金牌会员　Posts 2,239　Credits 4,639
I don't know if this thread can solve your problem: http://www.cn-dos.net/forum/viewthread.php?tid=40569 Although I don't know how to solve your problem, does DOS have to retire just because it can't be shut down by software? DOS has never been about shutting down by software. You people have been pampered under Windows, wanting everything to be automatic. If it can't be automatic, you can't live anymore?

Floor3　netwinxp	Posted 2008-12-08 11:55
高级用户　Posts 366　Credits 741
It is very likely that this computer does not support APM, and you need to use a shutdown software that supports ACPI, such as FDAPM -ACPIOFF. [ Last edited by netwinxp on 2008-12-8 at 11:58 ]

Floor4　tmt2006	Posted 2008-12-18 00:19
初级用户　Posts 49　Credits 135
Originally posted by DOSforever at 2008-12-6 18:12: I don't know if this thread can solve your problem: http://www.cn-dos.net/forum/viewthread.php?tid=40569 Although I don't know how to solve your problem, if the software can't shut down DOS, it has to quit... DOS is originally a underdog, not designed for today's hardware at all. So it's a miracle that DOS has survived ten or fifteen years in the commercial field and is still tenaciously surviving today. Of course, it can't do without fans like you. After testing, Fdapm.com is still not up to the task, the old horse is past his prime. It's really a pity!

Floor5　Climbing	Posted 2008-12-18 00:36
铂金会员　Posts 2,753　Credits 6,962　From 河北保定
To me, it can only be blamed on hardware manufacturers. What they make is non-standard, deliberately squeezing the living space of DOS. If you have the ability, let them make a piece of hardware that is incompatible with Windows. They wouldn't dare even if they were scared to death. This is a shoddy businessman, and there's no business that isn't shoddy.

Floor6　DOSforever	Posted 2008-12-18 11:41
金牌会员　Posts 2,239　Credits 4,639
首先分析原文中“拥虿”应该是“拥趸”的笔误，“拥趸”的英文是“supporter”或“follower”。翻译后的内容为： Originally posted by tmt2006 at 2008-12-18 00:19: DOS was originally a underdog, not at all tailored for today's hardware. So it's a miracle that DOS has survived ten or fifteen years in the commercial field and still survived today. Of course, it is inseparable from supporters like you. After testing, Fdapm.com is still not up to the task, old and feeble. It's really a pity! What is a "supporter"?

Floor7　bc12060101	Posted 2008-12-18 15:35
银牌会员　Posts 712　Credits 1,455
Originally posted by DOSforever at 2008-12-18 11:41: What is a "yongchai"? Hey, a "yongchai" is a FANS.

Floor8　netwinxp	Posted 2008-12-20 13:54
高级用户　Posts 366　Credits 741
Originally posted by Climbing at 2008-12-18 00:36: In my opinion, it can only be blamed on hardware manufacturers. The things they make are non-standard, deliberately restricting the living space of DOS. If you have the ability, let them make a piece of hardware that is incompatible with Windows. They wouldn't dare even if they were scared to death. This is a shoddy merchant, and there's no honest merchant. This is not that the hardware is incompatible with it, but that DOS was originally designed based on the 8086 architecture, and its support for new hardware expansion has inherent deficiencies. The current X86 platform (except for pure 32-bit Pentium PRO and pure 64-bit IA64), has largely accommodated DOS in terms of hardware (especially the segmented: offset memory access architecture. Generally, CPUs support 64K memory for 16-bit, 4G for 32-bit, and directly use linear memory addresses).

Floor9　Climbing	Posted 2008-12-20 14:24
铂金会员　Posts 2,753　Credits 6,962　From 河北保定
No matter how problematic the design of DOS is, it is the basic industrial standard of PCs. The greatest advantage of PCs is compatibility. Without compatibility, the foundation for survival would not even exist.

Floor10　Sufone	Posted 2008-12-20 15:38
中级用户　Posts 124　Credits 256
And try this: Run the following program in Debug: mov ax,5301 xor bx,bx int 15 mov ax,5307 mov bx,1 mov cx,3 int 15

Floor11　tmt2006	Posted 2008-12-25 23:21
初级用户　Posts 49　Credits 135
Originally posted by Sufone at 2008-12-20 15:38: Try this: Run the following program in Debug: mov ax,5301 xor bx,bx int 15 mov ax,5307 mov bx,1 mov cx,3 int 15 Still unable to shut down, causing a system freeze. Pressing ctrl+alt+del can restart.