China DOS Union
-- Unite DOS · Advance DOS · Grow DOS --Union site: www.cn-dos.net Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum
|
China DOS Union-- Unite DOS · Advance DOS · Grow DOS --Union site: www.cn-dos.net Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum |
| Guest | Log in | Register | Members | Search | China DOS Union |
|
中国DOS联盟论坛 The time now is 2026-08-26 13:06 |
47,812 topics / 349,910 posts / today 0 new / 48,264 members |
| DOS汉化世界 & 中文系统 （中文化室） » Localization of HD-COPY 2.9. |
| Printable Version 2,297 / 11 |
| Floor1 CWD | Posted 2003-06-26 00:00 |
| 初级用户 Posts 22 Credits 165 | |
|
Which boss can localize HD-COPY 2.9?
Little brother likes it very much. |
|
| Floor2 Dark-Destroy | Posted 2003-06-27 00:00 |
| 元老会员 Posts 3,551 Credits 8,312 | |
|
I remember HD-COPY has a Chinese version~
|
|
| Floor3 yiyesong | Posted 2003-06-27 00:00 |
| 元老会员 Posts 632 Credits 1,987 | |
|
My bootable disk uses the Chinese version of HD-COPY. See here:
http://www2.zzu.edu.cn/ie/newdos/dispbbs.asp?boardID=11&ID=4298 |
|
| Floor4 如是大师 | Posted 2003-06-27 00:00 |
| 元老会员 Posts 3,351 Credits 9,654 From 湖北 | |
|
This area I have posted. .. Look for it. .. But remember to use Tianhui on the Chinese platform
|
|
| Floor5 CWD | Posted 2003-06-27 00:00 |
| 初级用户 Posts 22 Credits 165 | |
|
I've used the 2.2 version. Now I'm looking for the Chinese - localized version of 2.9. Does anyone have it?
|
|
| Floor6 沈洁 | Posted 2003-06-27 00:00 |
| 金牌会员 Posts 1,812 Credits 4,590 From 上海市 | |
|
You ah!
How should I tell you! I have used HD-COPY from 2.0 to 3.0, But you need to know that only HD-COPY 2.0 is the best! Why! It's simple, Because HD-COPY 2.0 is the last version of HD-COPY made by the author! Versions above HD-COPY 2.0 are all modified by others, As a result, the reading and writing ability of HD-COPY has been greatly reduced! This is also the reason why Mr. Niu Yunfei only localized the HD-COPY 2.0 version. |
|
| Floor7 Wengier | Posted 2003-06-27 00:00 |
| 系统支持 Posts 10,521 Credits 27,736 | |
|
Why does the ability keep decreasing instead of improving as it is modified more?
|
|
| Floor8 沈洁 | Posted 2003-06-27 00:00 |
| 金牌会员 Posts 1,812 Credits 4,590 From 上海市 | |
|
It's very simple!
Because it wasn't modified by the author himself! So not getting to the point! Also, it's said by Mr. Niu Yunfei that HD-COPY2.0 is good! The actual situation is the same too. |
|
| Floor9 pfox | Posted 2003-06-28 00:00 |
| 银牌会员 Posts 446 Credits 1,451 | |
|
I've been using version 3.0 all the time, and I don't feel that it's worse than version 2.0 in any way.
|
|
| Floor10 沈洁 | Posted 2003-06-28 00:00 |
| 金牌会员 Posts 1,812 Credits 4,590 From 上海市 | |
|
It's very simple,
You go and find a few floppy disks that can't be written with HD-COPY3.0, Then use HD-COPY2.0 to write to them and you'll know where the advantage lies! |
|
| Floor11 CWD | Posted 2003-06-30 00:00 |
| 初级用户 Posts 22 Credits 165 | |
|
Okay, then I'll use version 2.0A. You guys should be right! ^_^!
|
|
| Floor12 jssyq | Posted 2003-07-01 00:00 |
| 银牌会员 Posts 498 Credits 1,231 | |
|
I feel that the 3.0 English version for repairing floppy disks is personally better than the 2.0 Chinese - localized version. As for the copying ability, I haven't tried it, so I can't say.
|
|
|
[ Contact the Union admin team -
中国DOS联盟 -
Standard version ] Sponsored by ifanr Inc | © 2001–2023 |