Union site: www.cn-dos.net Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum
DOS stands for freedom, openness and progress. Let us work hard, learn from the openness and GNU spirit of FreeDOS and Linux, and together build and grow a free GNU GPL world!
Credits 4,590 Posts 1,812 Joined 2003-04-02 00:00 23-year member UID 1400 Gender Male From 上海市
Status Offline
You ah!
How should I tell you!
I have used HD-COPY from 2.0 to 3.0,
But you need to know that only HD-COPY 2.0 is the best!
Why!
It's simple,
Because HD-COPY 2.0 is the last version of HD-COPY made by the author!
Versions above HD-COPY 2.0 are all modified by others,
As a result, the reading and writing ability of HD-COPY has been greatly reduced!
This is also the reason why Mr. Niu Yunfei only localized the HD-COPY 2.0 version.
Credits 4,590 Posts 1,812 Joined 2003-04-02 00:00 23-year member UID 1400 Gender Male From 上海市
Status Offline
It's very simple!
Because it wasn't modified by the author himself!
So not getting to the point!
Also, it's said by Mr. Niu Yunfei that HD-COPY2.0 is good!
The actual situation is the same too.
Credits 4,590 Posts 1,812 Joined 2003-04-02 00:00 23-year member UID 1400 Gender Male From 上海市
Status Offline
It's very simple,
You go and find a few floppy disks that can't be written with HD-COPY3.0,
Then use HD-COPY2.0 to write to them and you'll know where the advantage lies!
Credits 1,231 Posts 498 Joined 2002-12-03 00:00 23-year member UID 398 Gender Male
Status Offline
I feel that the 3.0 English version for repairing floppy disks is personally better than the 2.0 Chinese - localized version. As for the copying ability, I haven't tried it, so I can't say.