Most intellectual property-related websites are closed
A few days ago, I sorted out nearly 20 mainstream domestic operating system modification websites. Most of these websites do not have open registrations and require introduction by formal members. Some simply have closed registrations.
These closed-operated websites are, on one hand, due to intellectual property issues, and more importantly, to win high-quality members. Although some information on these websites can be searched by search engines, when opening the pages, one must register to browse. Some important information, such as attachments and important materials, requires replying or the member having a certain level. There are many such websites, such as Luohuzhe Forum, Longjuanfeng, Yingzheng, etc.
Google criticizes website closure
Recently, social networking sites (SNS) are very popular, such as Hai Nei, Xiaonei, 5G, Kaixin.com, etc. Because these websites are based on users' real information, privacy protection is stricter. Many websites, through program settings, can hardly be captured by search engines. Previously, Google also criticized the practices of closed websites like Facebook, believing that these closed-operated websites violate the openness of the Internet and are not conducive to information sharing. We can also see this through checking the PR value of the website. The PR value of SNS websites is generally low, and some simply have none.
Where will closed-operated websites go?
The closed operation of websites does indeed have a destructive effect on the development of the Internet and largely challenges the traditional development model of the Internet. Because we find that the information value of these closed websites is often high. Especially some enthusiastic users are willing to share their valuable information with their friends, which is indeed unfriendly to the outside world.
Take an example: There is a column called 5G in the IT writing community donews. To access this column, it needs to be invited by internal senior users. Once these columns sorted out a large number of contact information of IT professionals through the form of posts. Due to the users' perception of the closure of the column, most were willing to open it to it. Of course, later this information was still distributed by some internal users. I discovered this when searching for my own contact information, and it was everywhere. Another example: At the beginning, the information of the SNS website 5G could be completely included by search engines, but recently it cannot. Even the personal homepages set to public can only be browsed after logging in. However, most users on SNS websites are acquaintances or aggregates of similar enthusiasts, and such things generally do not happen.
In any case, with the popularity of SNS, there will be more and more closed-operated websites, which is indeed a huge challenge to Google and others. For new things in these industries, we can only wait and see.
Where will those closed-operated websites go?
http://www.nsbase.cn/
[ Last edited by baodeyong on 2009-4-27 at 08:41 ]
A few days ago, I sorted out nearly 20 mainstream domestic operating system modification websites. Most of these websites do not have open registrations and require introduction by formal members. Some simply have closed registrations.
These closed-operated websites are, on one hand, due to intellectual property issues, and more importantly, to win high-quality members. Although some information on these websites can be searched by search engines, when opening the pages, one must register to browse. Some important information, such as attachments and important materials, requires replying or the member having a certain level. There are many such websites, such as Luohuzhe Forum, Longjuanfeng, Yingzheng, etc.
Google criticizes website closure
Recently, social networking sites (SNS) are very popular, such as Hai Nei, Xiaonei, 5G, Kaixin.com, etc. Because these websites are based on users' real information, privacy protection is stricter. Many websites, through program settings, can hardly be captured by search engines. Previously, Google also criticized the practices of closed websites like Facebook, believing that these closed-operated websites violate the openness of the Internet and are not conducive to information sharing. We can also see this through checking the PR value of the website. The PR value of SNS websites is generally low, and some simply have none.
Where will closed-operated websites go?
The closed operation of websites does indeed have a destructive effect on the development of the Internet and largely challenges the traditional development model of the Internet. Because we find that the information value of these closed websites is often high. Especially some enthusiastic users are willing to share their valuable information with their friends, which is indeed unfriendly to the outside world.
Take an example: There is a column called 5G in the IT writing community donews. To access this column, it needs to be invited by internal senior users. Once these columns sorted out a large number of contact information of IT professionals through the form of posts. Due to the users' perception of the closure of the column, most were willing to open it to it. Of course, later this information was still distributed by some internal users. I discovered this when searching for my own contact information, and it was everywhere. Another example: At the beginning, the information of the SNS website 5G could be completely included by search engines, but recently it cannot. Even the personal homepages set to public can only be browsed after logging in. However, most users on SNS websites are acquaintances or aggregates of similar enthusiasts, and such things generally do not happen.
In any case, with the popularity of SNS, there will be more and more closed-operated websites, which is indeed a huge challenge to Google and others. For new things in these industries, we can only wait and see.
Where will those closed-operated websites go?
http://www.nsbase.cn/
[ Last edited by baodeyong on 2009-4-27 at 08:41 ]
