![]() |
China DOS Union-- Unite DOS · Advance DOS · Grow DOS --Union site: www.cn-dos.net Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum |
| Guest | Log in | Register | Members | Search | China DOS Union |
|
中国DOS联盟论坛 The time now is 2026-09-13 23:45 |
47,812 topics / 349,916 posts / today 0 new / 48,268 members |
| DOS启动盘 & LOGO技术 (启动盘室) » [Original] I used NDD to repair a “logical lock” and failed completely |
| Printable Version 1,631 / 9 |
| Floor1 Wengier | Posted 2003-06-25 00:00 |
| 系统支持 Posts 10,521 Credits 27,736 | |
|
Last time I accidentally got a very old small hard disk (only 80MB), and it only had MS-DOS 6.20 on it. Now I also have an MS-DOS 7.10 boot disk that is not afraid of “logical locks”, so I was going to try booting into DOS with it and see whether I could use software like NDD2002 to directly repair the “logical lock” on the hard disk.
After putting the “logical lock” on the hard disk, I used this latest MS-DOS 7.10 boot disk (at this point that May 16 version “Super MS-DOS 7.10 Boot Disk” could not boot) and very smoothly booted to A:\, but of course drive C was already gone at that point. I first ran FDISK.EXE and SPFDISK.EXE on drive A, but they reported an error in the hard disk partition. So I then ran NDD.EXE on drive A to start NDD2002, preparing to repair drive C. After selecting “Diagnose disk” from the NDD main menu, NDD reported errors on the hard disk and asked whether to repair them. I selected “Yes” a total of three times (and I had selected the “Undo” function), then NDD said the hard disk partition table had been updated and asked whether to restart the system, so I restarted the system to see whether the hard disk “logical lock” had been removed. However, this time the boot process was obviously abnormal. After the system finished BIOS self-test and recognized this hard disk, there was a very long delay (there had been no such thing just now!), and only then did it start reading drive A (I had it set to boot from A). Drive A was still the latest MS-DOS 7.10 boot disk, yet after reading for a few seconds the floppy drive light actually went out, almost like it had hung. However, after waiting about 2 minutes, the floppy drive light came back on and the message “Starting MS-DOS 7.1..” appeared, and then it still booted to A:\ as usual. The same thing happened with the ROM-DOS 7.10 boot disk. At this point the hard disk still could not be recognized. So I ran NDD again, and it still said there were hard disk errors. Clearly NDD2002 simply cannot repair a “logical lock”. So I decided to “Undo”, but during the Undo process NDD said the Undo failed and could not continue! It could not even restore things—really dizzying!! At this point the situation was even worse than when there had only been the “logical lock”, and even harder to repair... It can be seen that NDD’s disk repair function is rather poor, and often the more it repairs, the worse things get (I had also run into another similar incident before~~). So NDD really must be used with caution—remember that! |
|
| Floor2 jssyq | Posted 2003-06-25 00:00 |
| 银牌会员 Posts 498 Credits 1,231 | |
|
Got it, thanks. 【NDD isn't omnipotent either】
|
|
| Floor3 Dark-Destroy | Posted 2003-06-25 00:00 |
| 元老会员 Posts 3,551 Credits 8,312 | |
|
Thanks, moderator Wengier...
|
|
| Floor4 gjfmlj | Posted 2003-06-25 00:00 |
| 中级用户 Posts 118 Credits 421 | |
|
Moderator, thanks for all the self-torture
|
|
| Floor5 Wengier | Posted 2003-06-25 00:00 |
| 系统支持 Posts 10,521 Credits 27,736 | |
|
Now I finally understand why there was such a long delay during boot at that time... When I used SPFDISK to repartition and format that old hard disk, I actually found a huge number of bad sectors from beginning to end! There had been no bad sectors before using NDD, which means NDD “repaired” it into having a huge number of bad sectors, including even the first sector going bad! Sigh, looks like this old hard disk can only be scrapped now~~
Supplement: It seems that if you want to repair a logical lock, it’s still better to boot into DOS and then use SRCMBR or NetResq.. |
|
| Floor6 jssyq | Posted 2003-06-25 00:00 |
| 银牌会员 Posts 498 Credits 1,231 | |
|
Question for the moderator: where can NetResq be downloaded? Thanks,
Also, another question: why is it that in posts where I reply, I can’t insert images or upload files? 【There is no upload option, only the 3 options OK! Post My Reply, Preview, Clear Content!】I have to make a new post myself before I can upload or insert images. System XP, browser MYIE2. I can’t figure it out, please advise, thanks |
|
| Floor7 pizigao | Posted 2003-06-25 00:00 |
| 银牌会员 Posts 292 Credits 1,063 | |
|
Got it!!!
|
|
| Floor8 Wengier | Posted 2003-06-25 00:00 |
| 系统支持 Posts 10,521 Credits 27,736 | |
The following is quoted from jssyq's post at 2003-6-25 10:55:44: Try choosing “Reply” or “Quote”, then you can upload files. Don’t choose “Quick Reply”. As for NetResq, there is a download in the “DOS Software Download” section, but I feel it is too complicated to use. |
|
| Floor9 jssyq | Posted 2003-06-26 00:00 |
| 银牌会员 Posts 498 Credits 1,231 | |
|
Got it, thanks, I'll try it next time
|
|
| Floor10 tom-aA1 | Posted 2004-10-16 00:00 |
| 初级用户 Posts 2 Credits 104 | |
|
Thanks, I still wanted to try it, good thing the OP was here!!
|
|
|
[ Contact the Union admin team -
中国DOS联盟 -
Standard version ] Sponsored by ifanr Inc | © 2001–2023 |