China DOS Union

-- Unite DOS · Advance DOS · Grow DOS --
Union site: www.cn-dos.net　Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum

中国DOS联盟论坛
The time now is 2026-09-28 21:35

47,813 topics / 349,918 posts / today 0 new / 48,278 members

DOS批处理 & 脚本技术（批处理室） » [Original] -------- bat and reg mixed programming (tested successfully under XP) --------

Floor1　s11ss	Posted 2008-08-18 20:31
银牌会员　Posts 566　Credits 2,098
REGEDIT4 ;@cls&regedit/s "%~f0"&goto bat /* bat-reg {s11ss@www.cn-dos.net 2008-8-18} :bat :bat code section -------- start @echo off echo Successfully added key CN-DOS under HKEY_CURRENT_USER! pause exit/b bat code section -------- end */ #reg code section -------- start #reg code section -------- end

Floor3　tempuser	Posted 2008-08-20 10:31
高级用户　Posts 261　Credits 547
Originally posted by s11ss at 2008-8-18 20:31: REGEDIT4 ;@cls&regedit/s "%~f0"&goto bat /* bat-reg {s11ss@www.cn-dos.net 2008-8-18} :bat :bat code section -------- start @echo off echo Successfully added key CN-DOS under HKEY_CURREN ... Could you give an example to learn from? It'd be even better if there were a detailed explanation.

Floor6　szww	Posted 2008-08-20 12:57
初级用户　Posts 28　Credits 59
I don't quite understand whether the content of the article is about reg or about bat. The REG part isn't very clear either. And the REGEDIT4 and REGEDIT5 headers are supposed to be for different operating system versions, right? Hope someone who knows can explain.

Floor7　flyinspace	Posted 2008-08-20 14:43
银牌会员　Posts 517　Credits 1,206
It just makes use of the characteristics of the header. (used quite cleverly) Put the OP's thing into 1.bat and try it. Then you'll understand.

Floor8　luckboy45	Posted 2008-08-20 19:44
中级用户　Posts 212　Credits 487
Hehe, mixed programming? I'll show my support. I quite like using INF, VBS, BAT, and REG mixed programming...

Floor9　quya	Posted 2008-08-20 20:51
高级用户　Posts 172　Credits 558　From 江苏
I didn't understand it. Although I know what it did, I still didn't understand it. To sum up what I didn't understand: 1. REGEDIT4 isn't a command at all. In a batch file it would give an error message, but here it's gone in a flash, maybe covered up by the immediately following "CLS" command. But some people said the header was used cleverly, so I'm still a bit puzzled. Is that what they meant? 2. The ";" on the 2nd line, doesn't that normally mean it gets ignored? But here...? 3. Then the "/*" on the 3rd line, I understand even less. 4. Then after that the "#", now I'm completely dizzy. 5. To get the final result, doing it in BAT wasn't really difficult in the first place, so what is writing it like this supposed to show? Does it have any practical prospects? Because I completely can't understand it, I can't make sense of it. Could post #4, #5, and everyone who gave it points clear up my confusion? Thanks.

Floor10　lxmxn	Posted 2008-08-21 07:13
版主　Posts 4,938　Credits 11,386
Originally posted by quya at 2008-8-20 20:51: I didn't understand it. Although I know what it did, I still didn't understand it. To sum up what I didn't understand: 1. REGEDIT4 isn't a command at all. In a batch file it would give an error message, but here it's gone in a flash, ma ... If you analyze the OP's code separately using the way of thinking for batch files and for registry scripts, you can understand it. The two scripts (actually integrated into one script) accomplish the same function of adding a registry key.