China DOS Union

-- Unite DOS · Advance DOS · Grow DOS --
Union site: www.cn-dos.net　Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum

中国DOS联盟论坛
The time now is 2026-10-31 13:40

47,815 topics / 349,930 posts / today 0 new / 48,290 members

DOS开发编程 & 发展交流（开发室） » Project 1: Drivers for softmodems (i.e. software modems) under pure DOS

Floor1　ko20010214	Posted 2002-10-21 00:00
版主　Posts 1,628　Credits 7,296
Project 1: Drivers for softmodems (i.e. software modems or WinModem) under pure DOS Description: Softmodems are a fairly common type of modem at present, but their biggest drawback is that both compatibility and performance are worse than hardware modems. Usually, if there is no driver under pure DOS, they cannot be used under pure DOS. So, everyone, let's develop this driver and help our softmodems so they can be used under pure DOS! I hope related articles on progress in this area will be posted after this thread

Floor2　beastie	Posted 2004-07-24 00:00
初级用户　Posts 80　Credits 66
LINUX enthusiasts have already disassembled many softmodem drivers now; you can use LINUX, since going online with LINUX brings you more stability and security than DOS.

Floor3　Wengier	Posted 2004-07-25 00:00
系统支持　Posts 10,521　Credits 27,736
There are too many Unix-like operating systems; why use that Linus's Minix (the so-called Linux)? Even FreeBSD, GNU Hurd, etc. have many advantages, not to mention Hurd is the standard one. Likewise, DOS is also a very excellent operating system.

Floor4　beastie	Posted 2004-07-25 00:00
初级用户　Posts 80　Credits 66
Right, FreeBSD development has to be approved by members of the core development team, while LINUX is very free; it only needs the approval of LINUS alone. Didn't the person upstairs say GNU is not the UNIX standard? Hurd is also GNU's ideal operating system kernel, so how could it be standard?

Floor5　《电脑爱好	Posted 2004-07-25 00:00
高级用户　Posts 270　Credits 693
Linux is trash too; FreeBSD is the genuine article......