Can this be achieved: How to prevent the telecom from scanning my MAC address?? - China DOS Union Forum

Our company has pulled a telecom network cable, but because the boss's wife restricts internet access, we can only use the allowed machine as a proxy server to access the internet through the proxy.
But today, someone from telecom called the boss's wife saying that you only pulled one cable, but it was found that there were seven or eight machines surfing the internet in the past two months, and they require either disconnecting or adding money. Telecom is getting more and more excessive. It only allows one machine to be online, as if having two more machines can give them more bandwidth.
I think he can check how many machines we have online, it must be by scanning MAC addresses, but can MAC addresses be hidden? I'm afraid camouflaging is possible.
Which expert can give some pointers, otherwise tomorrow the cat will be out of the bag and we won't be able to access the internet!
Anxious to the point of wanting to go crazy - there are still people who don't allow internet access in this era~~
By the way, we use the ccproxy software for proxy internet access.

[ Last edited by ednykissyou on 2008-7-9 at 07:15 PM ]

I think you should resort to legal means to solve this problem. As you said, the telecommunication company didn't increase the bandwidth just because you have a few more machines (except when you share a network cable with others), so they have no right to restrict you from using multiple machines to access the Internet, and they can't win the case no matter which level of court you sue in.

The problem you encountered is probably the so-called extremely powerful Net Sentry. I've never encountered it because I've always used a Netcom line. The solution seems to have been seen on the Internet before (you can search for "Net Sentry" on Google), but there doesn't seem to be a very effective solution.

Go ask here. I don't understand the specific principle either, but it seems that you can prevent telecommunication scanning by replacing the device.
http://www.chinadsl.net/

Just happened to see a related article, hope it is useful to LZ.
http://www.17xf.net/ask/question.php?id=298

I don't know where the original poster is. Here, our telecom never cares. I use a wired/wireless router to access the Internet, and a total of six machines can be connected. The telecom doesn't come to manage me either. The original poster is really pitiful ^

Telecom rarely cares about this matter///

Floor1　ednykissyou	Posted 2008-07-09 19:07
初级用户　Posts 88　Credits 182
Our company has pulled a telecom network cable, but because the boss's wife restricts internet access, we can only use the allowed machine as a proxy server to access the internet through the proxy. But today, someone from telecom called the boss's wife saying that you only pulled one cable, but it was found that there were seven or eight machines surfing the internet in the past two months, and they require either disconnecting or adding money. Telecom is getting more and more excessive. It only allows one machine to be online, as if having two more machines can give them more bandwidth. I think he can check how many machines we have online, it must be by scanning MAC addresses, but can MAC addresses be hidden? I'm afraid camouflaging is possible. Which expert can give some pointers, otherwise tomorrow the cat will be out of the bag and we won't be able to access the internet! Anxious to the point of wanting to go crazy - there are still people who don't allow internet access in this era~~ By the way, we use the ccproxy software for proxy internet access. [ Last edited by ednykissyou on 2008-7-9 at 07:15 PM ]

Floor2　Climbing	Posted 2008-07-09 21:16
铂金会员　Posts 2,753　Credits 6,962　From 河北保定
I think you should resort to legal means to solve this problem. As you said, the telecommunication company didn't increase the bandwidth just because you have a few more machines (except when you share a network cable with others), so they have no right to restrict you from using multiple machines to access the Internet, and they can't win the case no matter which level of court you sue in. The problem you encountered is probably the so-called extremely powerful Net Sentry. I've never encountered it because I've always used a Netcom line. The solution seems to have been seen on the Internet before (you can search for "Net Sentry" on Google), but there doesn't seem to be a very effective solution.

Floor3　dato	Posted 2008-07-09 23:52
高级用户　Posts 377　Credits 916
Go ask here. I don't understand the specific principle either, but it seems that you can prevent telecommunication scanning by replacing the device. http://www.chinadsl.net/

Floor4　lxmxn	Posted 2008-07-10 04:21
版主　Posts 4,938　Credits 11,386
Just happened to see a related article, hope it is useful to LZ. http://www.17xf.net/ask/question.php?id=298

Floor5　jh1688	Posted 2008-07-14 19:47
中级用户　Posts 126　Credits 248
I don't know where the original poster is. Here, our telecom never cares. I use a wired/wireless router to access the Internet, and a total of six machines can be connected. The telecom doesn't come to manage me either. The original poster is really pitiful ^

Floor6　hisplay	Posted 2008-08-17 15:35
初级用户　Posts 56　Credits 108
Telecom rarely cares about this matter///