I saw this post in time and space, but no one replied. I also really want to know the reason, so I repost it here!
I have a few questions about the mutual invocation of various bootloaders, hoping that experts can give me some advice!
1. After the A bootloader --> B bootloader, does the A bootloader still exist in memory? Or does A have an impact on the subsequent B?
2. After DOS --> Grub4dos, when returning to DOS from Grub4dos, is DOS reloaded, or is DOS already in memory and directly called?
3. Why is the boot speed of the USB flash drive in the way of GNU GRUB --> NTLDR --> Grub4dos --> pe much faster than that in the way of GNU GRUB --> Grub4dos --> pe?
4. After syslinux starts, can it directly call NTLDR, that is, syslinux --> ntldr -->....? If yes, how to write syslinux.cfg?
Thanks!!!
I have a few questions about the mutual invocation of various bootloaders, hoping that experts can give me some advice!
1. After the A bootloader --> B bootloader, does the A bootloader still exist in memory? Or does A have an impact on the subsequent B?
2. After DOS --> Grub4dos, when returning to DOS from Grub4dos, is DOS reloaded, or is DOS already in memory and directly called?
3. Why is the boot speed of the USB flash drive in the way of GNU GRUB --> NTLDR --> Grub4dos --> pe much faster than that in the way of GNU GRUB --> Grub4dos --> pe?
4. After syslinux starts, can it directly call NTLDR, that is, syslinux --> ntldr -->....? If yes, how to write syslinux.cfg?
Thanks!!!
