Regarding the post-reply issue - China DOS Union Forum - China DOS Union

Recently, I came across some articles about 139 port intrusion and found something interesting. All the information I searched for was trite and outdated, yet people are still forwarding it. Is there any point? I think it's of no value at all.

Everyone, think about what era it is now, the computer era~~~~~~ It's not the era a decade ago when there were numerous weak passwords and vulnerabilities everywhere (of course, there are still plenty of vulnerabilities in front of experts). Now, are there still people who don't set passwords for their computers, don't change the administrator account, don't install antivirus software, don't install firewalls, and don't install system optimization software? I haven't come across many. I'm currently responsible for repairing computers for classmates and teachers. I think no one knows the situation of computer usage in our school better than me~~~ 90% of the computers have restricted guest mode, leaving only the administrator account. Among these 90%, less than 5% haven't changed the ADMINISTRATOR. Not only has the administrator account name been changed, but the boot screen, desktop... are all very dazzling... In our school, only the office computers have sharing, but they are not in the same network segment as student internet users. It's really difficult for ordinary people to invade~~~~ Besides, there aren't such technically skilled people in our school.

Just now, I pinged that suspicious IP address and scanned it with X-SCAN. Only 139, 110, and 25 ports were open. The account and password are unknown, and the default sharing doesn't exist. I looked up some information about 139 intrusion on the internet, but after trying, none of them worked. Either there were errors or it was NO... It's really frustrating. The online versions are probably just three types, and they have commonalities~~~~

Alas... I hope such posting situations won't appear in our union. After all, we are here for DOS. I hope everyone tries to post high-quality, well-verified good posts and excellent posts. That's really the purpose of our coming here~~~~

The above is purely my humble opinion. I hope you all don't blame me~~~~

Floor1　hly	Posted 2008-01-12 22:59
初级用户　Posts 7　Credits 28　From 江苏
Recently, I came across some articles about 139 port intrusion and found something interesting. All the information I searched for was trite and outdated, yet people are still forwarding it. Is there any point? I think it's of no value at all. Everyone, think about what era it is now, the computer era~~~~~~ It's not the era a decade ago when there were numerous weak passwords and vulnerabilities everywhere (of course, there are still plenty of vulnerabilities in front of experts). Now, are there still people who don't set passwords for their computers, don't change the administrator account, don't install antivirus software, don't install firewalls, and don't install system optimization software? I haven't come across many. I'm currently responsible for repairing computers for classmates and teachers. I think no one knows the situation of computer usage in our school better than me~~~ 90% of the computers have restricted guest mode, leaving only the administrator account. Among these 90%, less than 5% haven't changed the ADMINISTRATOR. Not only has the administrator account name been changed, but the boot screen, desktop... are all very dazzling... In our school, only the office computers have sharing, but they are not in the same network segment as student internet users. It's really difficult for ordinary people to invade~~~~ Besides, there aren't such technically skilled people in our school. Just now, I pinged that suspicious IP address and scanned it with X-SCAN. Only 139, 110, and 25 ports were open. The account and password are unknown, and the default sharing doesn't exist. I looked up some information about 139 intrusion on the internet, but after trying, none of them worked. Either there were errors or it was NO... It's really frustrating. The online versions are probably just three types, and they have commonalities~~~~ Alas... I hope such posting situations won't appear in our union. After all, we are here for DOS. I hope everyone tries to post high-quality, well-verified good posts and excellent posts. That's really the purpose of our coming here~~~~ The above is purely my humble opinion. I hope you all don't blame me~~~~

Floor2　yijian2002	Posted 2008-01-13 13:24
新手上路　Posts 2　Credits 4
o(∩_∩)o...That's very much to the point. But your standards are still a bit high. I also help classmates set up computers, and their settings can drive you even crazier!

Floor3　hly	Posted 2008-01-13 21:58
初级用户　Posts 7　Credits 28　From 江苏
Hehe... It's not that I have high requirements~~~ It's really that their post is unethical! !~~ They directly found one from the Internet and answered someone's question, without testing it themselves. I believe you all have encountered such situations too! ! ! ! Anyway, I've been driven crazy by these useless posts. Several times when I encountered difficulties, what they posted didn't work, and I still had to ask people for help in the group! ! ! ! Wuwu...

Floor4　yf612	Posted 2008-01-23 11:49
初级用户　Posts 43　Credits 94
Practice is the sole criterion for testing truth!!! How to use traditional Chinese DOS software under XP? Does anyone know???