![]() |
China DOS Union-- Unite DOS · Advance DOS · Grow DOS --Union site: www.cn-dos.net Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum |
| Guest | Log in | Register | Members | Search | China DOS Union |
|
中国DOS联盟论坛 The time now is 2026-09-06 09:04 |
47,812 topics / 349,914 posts / today 0 new / 48,268 members |
| DOS启动盘 & LOGO技术 (启动盘室) » A suggestion for Wengier about the Super MS-DOS 7.10 boot disk |
| Printable Version 1,152 / 8 |
| Floor1 maple | Posted 2003-06-07 00:00 |
| 中级用户 Posts 137 Credits 417 | |
|
I have a question to discuss with Wengier. In your Super Boot Disk MSDOS7.1, you used the CAB compressed format to save space, and also used virtual memory to extract the software in the CAB into virtual memory. I wonder whether you noticed that the boot time is too long! I think you could use HD-COPY to format the floppy disk as 1.72M, put commonly used software directly into it, and give up using this virtual disk thing at boot time. That would save quite a bit of time during boot. Formatting the floppy disk as 1.72M is not an excessive requirement for the diskette; I have been using it all along. At the same time, you can fit in more useful software!
|
|
| Floor2 yhg | Posted 2003-06-07 00:00 |
| 初级用户 Posts 5 Credits 112 | |
|
That's a good idea!
|
|
| Floor3 Error | Posted 2003-06-07 00:00 |
| 初级用户 Posts 86 Credits 344 From 广东 | |
|
But doing it that way is too risky!!!
|
|
| Floor4 tanglu_sd | Posted 2003-06-07 00:00 |
| 高级用户 Posts 271 Credits 948 From sd | |
|
1.68M can't be used as a bootable CD
|
|
| Floor5 beginner | Posted 2003-06-07 00:00 |
| 初级用户 Posts 2 Credits 106 | |
|
I agree with the poster above. I use NERO to burn boot disks, and a disk formatted as 1.68M cannot boot.
|
|
| Floor6 Wengier | Posted 2003-06-07 00:00 |
| 系统支持 Posts 10,521 Credits 27,736 | |
|
Thank you for your suggestion! Completely dropping CAB may not be very practical. But I could try reducing the number of compressed files in the CAB to speed up booting.
If a 1.72M disk really can't be made into a CD image, then that is quite troublesome too.. |
|
| Floor7 沈洁 | Posted 2003-06-07 00:00 |
| 金牌会员 Posts 1,812 Credits 4,590 From 上海市 | |
|
Personally, I think
1.44mb is still a bit more reliable! I don't even know how many disks I've already worn out! |
|
| Floor8 maple | Posted 2003-06-11 00:00 |
| 中级用户 Posts 137 Credits 417 | |
|
Or maybe everyone uses it differently. I myself can generally handle problems just by booting the software, and have never used the tools on CDs.
With 1.72M (that is, 1.68M) software, I myself have not encountered disks going bad; maybe it's a software issue! |
|
| Floor9 Wengier | Posted 2003-06-16 00:00 |
| 系统支持 Posts 10,521 Credits 27,736 | |
|
1.68MB floppies are generally still fairly stable. Unfortunately, they indeed cannot be used as a standard 1.44MB bootable CD image..
|
|
|
[ Contact the Union admin team -
中国DOS联盟 -
Standard version ] Sponsored by ifanr Inc | © 2001–2023 |