中国DOS联盟论坛

China DOS Union

-- Unite DOS · Advance DOS · Grow DOS --
Union site: www.cn-dos.net Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum
Guest | Log in | Register | Members | Search | China DOS Union
中国DOS联盟论坛
The time now is 2026-08-07 13:41
48,040 topics / 350,125 posts / today 0 new / 48,252 members
DOS批处理 & 脚本技术(批处理室) » Essential for bare metal, virus immunity package (updated on October 1, 2007)
Printable Version  3,865 / 37
Floor1 angel144 Posted 2007-09-17 20:10
初级用户 Posts 26 Credits 66
This virus immunity package is made based on the Sanlian virus 5.30 immunity package.
The principle is still to prevent the generation of virus files by using 0kb-sized folders to block them to prevent known viruses.
Finally, thanks to Sanlian and all enthusiastic netizens. Let's join hands together to resist viruses and trojans.
The version number of this virus immunity package is 20070904
The latest updated version number is 20071001. The update date is October 1, 2007. Basically, it immunizes against various common malignant viruses and trojan groups. The next version will prevent unknown viruses.
Usage method: Just double-click to run. Those who have installed the old version patch can also directly run this immunity patch
The program can directly skip the old version patch and install the new immunity file.
If there is a BUG, or if you provide a virus sample, please contact QQ: 38463179 E-MAIL: angel144@yeah.net Shenlan
Thank you.
Supplementary note: The description in the virus immunity package is not entirely accurate. It is to add some registry contents. Mainly to prevent particularly malignant viruses.

[ Last edited by angel144 on 2007-10-1 at 11:24 AM ]

Attachments
深蓝病毒免疫包.rar (15.23 KiB)
Floor2 HAT Posted 2007-09-18 07:29
版主 Posts 5,017 Credits 9,023
Obviously modified the registry
The statement also says it wasn't modified
Floor3 knoppix7 Posted 2007-09-18 18:16
银牌会员 Posts 634 Credits 1,287 From cmd.exe
Since it has been modified. Then delete it

[ Last edited by knoppix7 on 2007-9-19 at 05:53 PM ]
Floor4 huayu278814214 Posted 2007-09-18 22:02
贫困用户 Posts 1 Credits -2
Floor5 angel144 Posted 2007-09-18 23:07
初级用户 Posts 26 Credits 66
Reply to Floor 2 and Floor 3

The instructions inside were copied from Sanlian originally. I didn't read them carefully.

Now I'm redoing the instructions. Indeed, a part of the registry has been added.

It's mainly for the prevention of registry image hijacking of particularly malicious viruses. I think most people here are more capable than me, and should also be able to understand it.

This immunity package is purely a batch file. Everyone can check the content of the batch file to see exactly what changes have been made to the system. Do I understand the registry? Actually, to be honest, not very much. I haven't deeply understood many things yet.

Of course, in any case, the immunity instructions were indeed incorrect. Here, I want to apologize to everyone. The instructions will be modified in future versions. Those who find it not useful can not use it, and there's no need to say more about this.

Finally, thank you to friends Floor 2 and Floor 3 for the reminders.

[ Last edited by angel144 on 2007-9-18 at 11:11 PM ]
Floor6 HAT Posted 2007-09-19 03:48
版主 Posts 5,017 Credits 9,023
//Mainly for the prevention of registry image hijacking of particularly malignant viruses

Really can't see what this can prevent
The original intention of doing this is to make the virus unable to run, right
But the virus can consider deleting these key values first, heh heh
Floor7 yovie Posted 2007-09-19 13:15
初级用户 Posts 42 Credits 92 From 重庆市巫山县
So long, no credit but also hard work. Thanks for your hard work. Keep up the good work.
Floor8 angel144 Posted 2007-09-19 18:16
初级用户 Posts 26 Credits 66
Originally posted by HAT at 2007-9-19 03:48 AM:
//Mainly for the prevention of registry image hijacking of particularly malignant viruses

I really can't see what this can prevent
The original intention of doing this is to prevent the virus from running
But the virus can consider deleting these key values first, heh heh

At present, the virus has not considered it.
And the common trojans are already immune now and cannot be generated. Of course, trojans and viruses can also
consider setting the immune folder permissions to full control and then generating. But at present, no trojans and viruses have done this. To be precise, most trojans and viruses have not done this. And
according to the actual effect, this thing is still okay. After installing it, the probability of getting infected is basically very low.
The principle is very simple, but it is difficult to collect all. It will be updated once a month in the future. Hehe, experts please forgive me
Floor9 knoppix7 Posted 2007-09-19 18:30
银牌会员 Posts 634 Credits 1,287 From cmd.exe
//Mainly to prevent registry image hijacking of particularly malicious viruses
If you can use command-line tools to modify the permissions of registry entries.
It should be able to prevent image hijacking
Floor10 kaidashi01 Posted 2007-09-19 18:58
初级用户 Posts 38 Credits 108
Is there a program that can't be uninstalled? I installed it, but I can't delete it.
Floor11 angel144 Posted 2007-09-19 21:06
初级用户 Posts 26 Credits 66
Originally posted by kaidashi01 at 2007-9-19 06:58 PM:
Is there any uninstall program? I installed it but can't delete it.

Uninstalling is simple. Reset the permissions and then delete the empty folders.
I'm sorry, but I'm currently very busy with work. I really don't have extra time to make an uninstall program. When I have time later, I will release it along with the uninstall program. Thank you
Floor12 angel144 Posted 2007-09-19 21:11
初级用户 Posts 26 Credits 66
Originally posted by knoppix7 at 2007-9-19 06:30 PM:
//Mainly for the prevention of registry image hijacking by particularly malignant viruses
If you can use command-line tools to modify the permissions of registry keys.
It should be possible to prevent image hijacking


Using the setacl tool can be done in combination. Currently, I am considering using the setacl tool
to lock certain important key values in the registry to prevent unknown viruses. Mainly considering
whether it is convenient for everyone to use. Or you can write two batch files. When needed,
unlock them. Usually, lock them. Subsequent versions will attempt to improve in this regard.
Floor13 luowei14 Posted 2007-09-19 22:22
初级用户 Posts 98 Credits 193
The building owner has worked hard... Adding points...
Floor14 HAT Posted 2007-09-20 05:36
版主 Posts 5,017 Credits 9,023
// It can be done with the setacl tool. Currently, I'm considering using the setacl tool to lock some important key values in the registry to prevent unknown viruses.

After modifying the registry in your program, set the permissions of this key value with the setacl command, which should be able to prevent some unknown viruses. Because some viruses add key values here to disable antivirus software.
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Image File Execution Options
Floor15 angel144 Posted 2007-09-20 12:18
初级用户 Posts 26 Credits 66
The suggestion from the brother on floor 14 is not bad. I didn't consider preventing the anti-virus software from being disabled. Because I'm in the internet café industry and rarely use anti-virus software. I think I should consider the universality of the application and set this to read-only.

In addition, what I most want to set permissions for are run runonce and HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon

These key values, as well as the system.ini and win.ini files, to prevent the self-start of unknown viruses.
Just will this cause errors when everyone installs normal software?
All compatibility and feasibility are still in the testing stage.
1 2 3  Next
[ Contact the Union admin team - 中国DOS联盟 - Standard version ]
Sponsored by ifanr Inc | © 2001–2023