China DOS Union

I like msdos7.10 (that is, the DOS that comes with Win98SE)
And Win98 (there's no way, sometimes to play DOS software in the Win system, I still need it)
I like the Win2000 Server version the most. (stable)
I don't know what to choose in the above vote.
Msdos6.22 is a bit old, it's better to use dos7.10. To be honest, when it comes to DOS, there are many better than these two...

I'm also using MS-DOS 7.10, but I rarely use MS-DOS 6.22 and Win98. I don't know which one to choose above.

I choose WIN98SE, but there's no special feeling.

What are the differences between Windows 98 SE and Windows 98?

Win98SE is an improvement over the first version of WIN98, more stable. The biggest change is replacing IE 4.0 with IE 5.0. The rest is mostly similar.

My favorite is still WIN2000. It is more stable than WIN98 and relatively safer (relatively). Although WINXP is gorgeous, it is not practical. I also like MS-DOS7.10, but I don't like MSDOS8.0. I also like LINUX. The one I hate the most is WINME, with too many bugs. A transitional product.

No Linux, freebsd, sco openserver, xenix, etc.

All of the above are from MS, not including PC-DOS, Unix, etc.

Hehe, I'm using Windows ME to go online. I want to use Linux to go online, but unfortunately the ADSL device I'm using is a USB interface (Alcatel Speed Touch ADSL Modem)

I first use 98SE, the reason is instability and frequent crashes. (The person in the audience put down the tomatoes first and listened to my explanation~~~~~~)
DOS is good, but it's not very easy to use. Win2000 is stable, but because it's too stable, so you can't learn much. But Win98 is different. Although it often breaks down, you can learn a lot (because when it breaks down, you have to fix it, to fix it you have to find the reason, to find the reason you have to read books, reading books will increase knowledge, increasing knowledge will become an expert, do you think it makes sense~~~~~~~~) (Damn, whose brick~~~~)

Win2000 isn't "too stable" either. Just now I ran several DOS programs in its DOS window and it crashed, so I had to press the power button to restart.

Oh, that's the case. Windows 2000 has a command prompt similar to DOS, but according to the book introduction, that's not DOS. So I think this should be the incompatibility between DOS programs and Windows 2000! Do you think so?

Of course, that's not real DOS, but a "DOS virtual machine", which also shows that there are still problems with the virtualization.

That makes sense. I'll ask you for more advice in the future!