Need a batch file to change folder audit permissions - China DOS Union Forum

Recently some machines got infected, and the folder permissions on drive E were changed. The CACLS command is totally useless,
it says "Access is denied". Then I checked the folder, and there wasn't a single user left. Looking again, there wasn't even a single owner left. After clicking Replace owner on subcontainers and objects, then I could use the CACLS command to change it back.
Now the problem is, I want to ask, can any expert teach me how to change the owner back under DOS? How should this command be written?
I want to write a batch file, changing them one machine at a time is too troublesome. .
Thanks

Wrong section. Bumping it again is no use.

Moved from DOS Troubleshooting & Problem Discussion (Help Room)

This thread is very good, keep it for educational purposes. I'll move it over anyway, others can continue replying to the topic.

DOSroot, grave-digging? You dug up a thread that's almost two years old, heh...

I've been sorting out the forum threads bit by bit, all of them.

As I've said before, unresolved problems can continue to be replied to, or if there's a better solution it can also be posted. As for truly meaningless replies, whether old or new, they're all subject to deletion.

http://www.cn-dos.net/forum/viewthread.php?tid=44597

Even if someone gives a solution, who knows where the OP has gone? How can we get him/her to confirm whether the problem was solved?
This thread is locked.

Although a given problem is raised by one particular person, it actually represents a large group of people with similar problems. If earlier people ran into this problem, later people will run into the same problem too, unless they learn the solution beforehand. Therefore, answering and discussing problems is actually about the "matter," not the "person". The poster may ignore their own thread for various reasons, but the problem they raised and the solutions proposed by everyone are still worth learning from and using as reference for those who come later. The original poster's problem may still not have been solved, and others may have the same problem too. If replies are uniformly forbidden, it will inevitably cause repeated posting. It is precisely because we don't want to waste the forum's resources that people are encouraged to search first and then ask questions; for still-unsolved problems, we hope that someone who knows will see them and come help solve them.
A forum, especially a technical forum, is not an entertainment news forum with such strong timeliness. A forum is not a running logbook, but a resource library, a resource library for solving all kinds of problems. Many problems do not have any timeliness at all. So when it comes to replies, it depends on what kind of reply it is; whether it is meaningful should not be divided by time. Some newly posted topics also get replies consisting of just the word "bump"—what is there to "bump" about?

Of course, that isn't my purpose in replying to this thread; the reason was already stated in #4.

Floor1　angel144	Posted 2007-02-07 00:46
初级用户　Posts 26　Credits 66
Recently some machines got infected, and the folder permissions on drive E were changed. The CACLS command is totally useless, it says "Access is denied". Then I checked the folder, and there wasn't a single user left. Looking again, there wasn't even a single owner left. After clicking Replace owner on subcontainers and objects, then I could use the CACLS command to change it back. Now the problem is, I want to ask, can any expert teach me how to change the owner back under DOS? How should this command be written? I want to write a batch file, changing them one machine at a time is too troublesome. . Thanks

Floor2　angel144	Posted 2007-02-07 22:14
初级用户　Posts 26　Credits 66
Bump again

Floor3　Wengier	Posted 2007-02-07 23:14
系统支持　Posts 10,521　Credits 27,736
Wrong section. Bumping it again is no use.

Floor4　DOSroot	Posted 2008-12-15 07:40
管理员　Posts 198　Credits 389
Moved from DOS Troubleshooting & Problem Discussion (Help Room) This thread is very good, keep it for educational purposes. I'll move it over anyway, others can continue replying to the topic.

Floor5　lxmxn	Posted 2008-12-15 08:08
版主　Posts 4,938　Credits 11,386
DOSroot, grave-digging? You dug up a thread that's almost two years old, heh...

Floor6　DOSroot	Posted 2008-12-15 08:48
管理员　Posts 198　Credits 389
I've been sorting out the forum threads bit by bit, all of them. As I've said before, unresolved problems can continue to be replied to, or if there's a better solution it can also be posted. As for truly meaningless replies, whether old or new, they're all subject to deletion. http://www.cn-dos.net/forum/viewthread.php?tid=44597

Floor7　HAT	Posted 2008-12-15 10:04
版主　Posts 5,017　Credits 9,023
Even if someone gives a solution, who knows where the OP has gone? How can we get him/her to confirm whether the problem was solved? This thread is locked.

Floor8　DOSroot	Posted 2008-12-15 10:54
管理员　Posts 198　Credits 389
Although a given problem is raised by one particular person, it actually represents a large group of people with similar problems. If earlier people ran into this problem, later people will run into the same problem too, unless they learn the solution beforehand. Therefore, answering and discussing problems is actually about the "matter," not the "person". The poster may ignore their own thread for various reasons, but the problem they raised and the solutions proposed by everyone are still worth learning from and using as reference for those who come later. The original poster's problem may still not have been solved, and others may have the same problem too. If replies are uniformly forbidden, it will inevitably cause repeated posting. It is precisely because we don't want to waste the forum's resources that people are encouraged to search first and then ask questions; for still-unsolved problems, we hope that someone who knows will see them and come help solve them. A forum, especially a technical forum, is not an entertainment news forum with such strong timeliness. A forum is not a running logbook, but a resource library, a resource library for solving all kinds of problems. Many problems do not have any timeliness at all. So when it comes to replies, it depends on what kind of reply it is; whether it is meaningful should not be divided by time. Some newly posted topics also get replies consisting of just the word "bump"—what is there to "bump" about? Of course, that isn't my purpose in replying to this thread; the reason was already stated in #4.