![]() |
China DOS Union-- Unite DOS · Advance DOS · Grow DOS --Union site: www.cn-dos.net Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum |
| Guest | Log in | Register | Members | Search | China DOS Union |
|
中国DOS联盟论坛 The time now is 2026-08-25 18:12 |
47,812 topics / 349,910 posts / today 0 new / 48,263 members |
| 其它操作系统综合讨论区 » Screenshots: Redhat 9,,,,Mandrake9 |
| Printable Version 1,243 / 7 |
| Floor1 autoit | Posted 2003-05-15 00:00 |
| 系统支持 Posts 339 Credits 904 From 厦门 | |
|
From Redhat 6.2 up to the current 9.0, the speed has really been getting slower and slower... but Mandrake9 is very different!!!
Red Flag is simply copying Windows!!!!!! ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
| Floor2 红色狂想 | Posted 2003-05-15 00:00 |
| 金牌会员 Posts 1,501 Credits 4,289 From 河南省 | |
|
Question: compared with the lLnux operating system and the Windows operating system, which one takes up more space after installation? Also, can Windows applications be installed on the lLnux operating system platform?
|
|
| Floor3 autoit | Posted 2003-05-15 00:00 |
| 系统支持 Posts 339 Credits 904 From 厦门 | |
The following is quoted from 红色狂想 on 2003-5-15 14:57:05: As for the current new versions like Redhat, Xlinux, Mandrake... even a custom minimal installation is bigger than 98... the software is basically not compatible, but fortunately Linux comes with a large amount of software integrated.... |
|
| Floor4 Roy | Posted 2003-05-15 00:00 |
| 管理员 Posts 1,633 Credits 4,869 | |
|
Of course not!!
Windows applications can run under linux through WINE |
|
| Floor5 hubing2002 | Posted 2003-05-20 00:00 |
| 初级用户 Posts 27 Credits 176 | |
|
Just use Symantec's XteamlLnux
|
|
| Floor6 禅宗 | Posted 2003-05-21 00:00 |
| 元老会员 Posts 300 Credits 1,019 From 广东 | |
|
RedHat 9 is slow??? I don't think so. After all, RedHat now has more and more services, and in terms of functionality and stability it's far better than Windows 2000. Personally, I think if you use it as a Web server, performance-wise it's even stronger than Win2003. So the key is really how you use it. An operating system is actually nothing more than an environment for applications!
|
|
| Floor7 autoit | Posted 2003-05-21 00:00 |
| 系统支持 Posts 339 Credits 904 From 厦门 | |
The following is quoted from 禅宗 on 2003-5-21 11:10:15: On my computer, RedHat 9 doesn't run as fast as 8, while Mandrake 9.1 is overall much faster than the earlier version.... |
|
| Floor8 LanE | Posted 2003-05-23 00:00 |
| 银牌会员 Posts 648 Credits 1,835 | |
|
Actually Mandrake entered the desktop market quite early, so it understands desktop users' habits a bit better. Redhat can't compare in that respect, and the interface looks better too. The only thing that makes me unhappy is that by default it automatically mounts Windows partitions, so you have to change it yourself.
Actually I personally think Slackware seems pretty good, BSD-based, with a very simple feel |
|
|
[ Contact the Union admin team -
中国DOS联盟 -
Standard version ] Sponsored by ifanr Inc | © 2001–2023 |