China DOS Union

-- Unite DOS · Advance DOS · Grow DOS --

Union site: www.cn-dos.net Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum
DOS stands for freedom, openness and progress. Let us work hard, learn from the openness and GNU spirit of FreeDOS and Linux, and together build and grow a free GNU GPL world!

中国DOS联盟论坛
The time now is 2026-08-25 17:28
中国DOS联盟论坛 » 其它操作系统综合讨论区 » Screenshots: Redhat 9,,,,Mandrake9 View 1,241 Replies 7
Original Poster Posted 2003-05-15 00:00 ·  中国 福建 厦门 电信(湖里
系统支持
★★★
Credits 904
Posts 339
Joined 2002-10-10 00:00
23-year member
UID 1904
From 厦门
Status Offline
From Redhat 6.2 up to the current 9.0, the speed has really been getting slower and slower... but Mandrake9 is very different!!!

Red Flag is simply copying Windows!!!!!!

Floor 2 Posted 2003-05-15 00:00 ·  中国 河南 驻马店 联通
金牌会员
★★★★
龙哥DOS
Credits 4,289
Posts 1,501
Joined 2003-02-23 00:00
23-year member
UID 983
Gender Male
From 河南省
Status Offline
Question: compared with the lLnux operating system and the Windows operating system, which one takes up more space after installation? Also, can Windows applications be installed on the lLnux operating system platform?
C++C++C++C++C++C++C++C++C++C++C++C++C++C++C++
C++ ☆☆☆ 中国DOS联盟成员 ☆☆☆ C++
C++ ★★★ 爱提问的红色狂想 ★★★ C++
C++C++C++C++C++C++C++C++C++C++C++C++C++C++C++
Floor 3 Posted 2003-05-15 00:00 ·  中国 福建 厦门 电信(湖里
系统支持
★★★
Credits 904
Posts 339
Joined 2002-10-10 00:00
23-year member
UID 1904
From 厦门
Status Offline
The following is quoted from 红色狂想 on 2003-5-15 14:57:05:
Question: compared with the lLnux operating system and the Windows operating system, which one takes up more space after installation? Also, can Windows applications be installed on the lLnux operating system platform?


As for the current new versions like Redhat, Xlinux, Mandrake... even a custom minimal installation is bigger than 98... the software is basically not compatible, but fortunately Linux comes with a large amount of software integrated....
Floor 4 Posted 2003-05-15 00:00 ·  中国 香港
管理员
★★★★
專業島民
Credits 4,869
Posts 1,633
Joined 2002-12-10 00:00
23-year member
UID 465
Gender Male
Status Offline
Of course not!!
Windows applications can run under linux through WINE
我的網站:http://mw16.2ya.com/ 我的網誌: http://scrappedblog.blogspot.com/
~
我的Winamp正在播放的歌曲:
Floor 5 Posted 2003-05-20 00:00 ·  中国 浙江 宁波 电信
初级用户
Credits 176
Posts 27
Joined 2003-05-17 00:00
23-year member
UID 2168
Gender Male
Status Offline
Just use Symantec's XteamlLnux
Floor 6 Posted 2003-05-21 00:00 ·  中国 海南 海口 电信
元老会员
★★★
CEO
Credits 1,019
Posts 300
Joined 2002-10-20 00:00
23-year member
UID 33
Gender Male
From 广东
Status Offline
RedHat 9 is slow??? I don't think so. After all, RedHat now has more and more services, and in terms of functionality and stability it's far better than Windows 2000. Personally, I think if you use it as a Web server, performance-wise it's even stronger than Win2003. So the key is really how you use it. An operating system is actually nothing more than an environment for applications!
禅宗——大道至简,知易行难!
网站: http://www.dgzens.com

QQ: 11951692 微信: dgzens
E-MAIL: warmrose@21cn.com
Floor 7 Posted 2003-05-21 00:00 ·  中国 福建 厦门 电信
系统支持
★★★
Credits 904
Posts 339
Joined 2002-10-10 00:00
23-year member
UID 1904
From 厦门
Status Offline
The following is quoted from 禅宗 on 2003-5-21 11:10:15:
RedHat 9 is slow??? I don't think so. After all, RedHat now has more and more services, and in terms of functionality and stability it's far better than Windows 2000. Personally, I think if you use it as a Web server, performance-wise it's even stronger than Win2003. So the key is really how you use it. An operating system is actually nothing more than an environment for applications!


On my computer, RedHat 9 doesn't run as fast as 8, while Mandrake 9.1 is overall much faster than the earlier version....
Floor 8 Posted 2003-05-23 00:00 ·  中国 河北 石家庄 联通
银牌会员
★★★
Credits 1,835
Posts 648
Joined 2002-11-08 00:00
23-year member
UID 197
Gender Male
Status Offline
Actually Mandrake entered the desktop market quite early, so it understands desktop users' habits a bit better. Redhat can't compare in that respect, and the interface looks better too. The only thing that makes me unhappy is that by default it automatically mounts Windows partitions, so you have to change it yourself.

Actually I personally think Slackware seems pretty good, BSD-based, with a very simple feel
Forum Jump: