China DOS Union

Just arrived at this forum, learned a lot from the experiences of seniors, and would like to express gratitude. Also, I need a way to redirect the files in the current directory to a new text file, but only have the file names in the text file, without showing the extensions.

[ Last edited by solover on 2006-11-14 at 04:51 PM ]

```@echo off
cd.>List.txt
for /f %%i in ('dir/b') do echo %%~ni>>List.txt

The person upstairs didn't read carefully. LZ doesn't want the file extension ^_^

First, thank you,大虾 zxcv, you've worked hard! I'll give it a try.

Test passed, thank you again

The 2F one shows the folder names as well, and it didn't consider file names with spaces. Modify it based on the 2F one:

@echo off cd.>List.txt for /f "delims=" %%i in ('dir /a-d /b') do >>List.txt echo %%~ni>>List.txt start List.txt

Thanks to the enthusiastic moderators, this is really a great place, feeling like home.

Always support the DOS Union

There is another question. Please help, everyone. I want to operate on several files with different suffixes and write them back after operation. Is there a way to ignore the suffix name (save according to the original suffix name)? Can batch processing achieve this? It can be flexible, as long as the above purpose is achieved.
------------------------------------
Original command line:
FOR /F %%I IN (list.txt) DO quick -j/%%I.tba//%%I.tba/ %%I.exe

The important thing is that I don't need to specify the exe file name later, because the files to be generated have other suffixes.

Note: llist.txt is the batch processing generated by the two previous poster.

[ Last edited by solover on 2006-11-14 at 05:40 PM ]

Your description is not very clear, making it difficult to understand your real intention: Are these several files saved in a certain directory, or is the names of these several files saved into list.txt? It's better that you don't give examples. Once you give examples, it's a bit confusing.

In addition, please don't open a new post to ask questions for posts with the same content. On the one hand, it is convenient for others to answer concentratedly in one post. On the other hand, it can also save forum resources and facilitate forum management. Your other post is actually the content you posted in 9F, and I have deleted it. Please understand.