中国DOS联盟论坛

China DOS Union

-- Unite DOS · Advance DOS · Grow DOS --
Union site: www.cn-dos.net Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum
Guest | Log in | Register | Members | Search | China DOS Union
中国DOS联盟论坛
The time now is 2026-08-26 10:57
47,812 topics / 349,910 posts / today 0 new / 48,264 members
DOS汉化世界 & 中文系统 (中文化室) » Please ask: What are the differences between TWAY and CCDOS97?
Printable Version  16,629 / 27
Floor1 ITU Posted 2006-10-02 12:34
中级用户 Posts 82 Credits 209
What are the differences between TWAY and CCDOS97, and which one is better with more advantages?
Floor2 雨露 Posted 2006-10-02 22:25
管理员 Posts 2,601 Credits 6,215
One is Tianhui, and the other is Chengran's CCDOS Chinese tool! Tianhui has good compatibility and is easy to use, just one file is enough. CCDOS has more functions, and the file is not very large either. Can't tell which is better! I usually use Tianhui.

[ Last edited by 雨露 on 2006-10-2 at 22:27 ]
Floor3 proof Posted 2006-10-03 02:06
高级用户 Posts 222 Credits 687
I use TWAY

Floor4 ITU Posted 2006-10-03 03:33
中级用户 Posts 82 Credits 209
TWAY+PY+WB compressed into a ZIP file is 285K.

CCDOS (97R1 streamlined version) + PY+WB compressed size is 282K.

The compressed sizes are similar, just not sure which one is more perfect.

[ Last edited by ITU on 2006-10-3 at 03:38 ]
Floor5 brglng Posted 2006-10-03 05:46
银牌会员 Posts 466 Credits 1,200 From 上海
I have tried it and think that UCDOS has the best compatibility, and after simplification, it is compressed to CAB only 184k
Floor6 雨露 Posted 2006-10-03 07:26
管理员 Posts 2,601 Credits 6,215
UCDOS-------I can only use UCDOS 7.0 version on the virtual machine, and other UCDOS versions cannot be used!
Floor7 brglng Posted 2006-10-03 07:37
银牌会员 Posts 466 Credits 1,200 From 上海
My UCDOS 98 runs well on VPC/VMWare/QEMU
Floor8 雨露 Posted 2006-10-03 09:53
管理员 Posts 2,601 Credits 6,215
Hehe, forgot there's also UCDOS98. Yeah, this one is okay. I mean the versions before UCDOS7.0, there are difficulties running them on virtual machines!
Floor9 ITU Posted 2006-10-03 11:24
中级用户 Posts 82 Credits 209
It seems that when running software like HD-COPY in UCDOS, it will crash, while TWAY and CCDOS won't.

[ Last edited by ITU on 2006-10-3 at 23:09 ]
Floor10 brglng Posted 2006-10-04 08:52
银牌会员 Posts 466 Credits 1,200 From 上海
Back in the DOS era, UCDOS was a well - known Chinese system to everyone, heh heh~~
If it's put in the boot disk, it's better to use UCDOS. It has a small size and good compatibility. If used on the hard disk, I prefer CCDOS.
TWAY occupies int13 and has conflicts with some software. After exiting TWAY, those software can't be used, but the memory can't be released.
Floor11 雨露 Posted 2006-10-04 10:00
管理员 Posts 2,601 Credits 6,215
There is a conflict between TWAY and diskgen on my computer, but it is compatible with UCDOS.
Floor12 ITU Posted 2006-10-25 11:06
中级用户 Posts 82 Credits 209
Originally posted by brglng at 2006-10-4 08:52:
... After exiting TWAY, those software can't work, but the memory can't be released.

Can you specify which software? Does CCDOS have such a situation?
Floor13 brglng Posted 2006-10-28 02:33
银牌会员 Posts 466 Credits 1,200 From 上海
For example, after loading DOSLFN and then running TWAY, after exiting TWAY, it is impossible to exit DOSLFN.
Floor14 ITU Posted 2006-10-29 03:59
中级用户 Posts 82 Credits 209
Originally posted by brglng at 2006-10-28 02:33:
For example, after loading DOSLFN and then running TWAY, after exiting TWAY, it is impossible to exit DOSLFN.


I can exit DOSLFN according to your method in VPC. Could it be just an individual situation that this problem occurs.

You said: "TWAY occupies int13 and has conflicts with some software", can you tell me which software it is. I want to test whether other Chinese systems have the same problem. Okay?
Floor15 ddctczy Posted 2007-03-18 13:58
中级用户 Posts 43 Credits 245
Back in the DOS era, UCDOS was for full functionality, but putting it on the boot disk wasn't its strong suit!!
I still quite like it!!!
1 2  Next
[ Contact the Union admin team - 中国DOS联盟 - Standard version ]
Sponsored by ifanr Inc | © 2001–2023